Mason Greenwood | Please be respectful and stay on topic

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,304
Location
Centreback
Wait, why is roleplay now a point for discussion?
Probably because nobody other than Caf posters has suggested anything of the sort. Making random excuses up doesn't seem like anything other than invention to justify what happened with borderline victim blaming.
 

Pickle85

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
6,661
Sorry folks. I was going to post another opinion about this situation but when I was 15 I got drunk down the park with my mates and pissed in a lake beside some swans, so I'm not allowed to say anything now.
Always wanted to see the Scottish remake of that famous ballet tbf.
 

Eriku

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
16,275
Location
Oslo, Norway
They don’t need to explain. They might have been advised against it in case there were repercussions for her, as has been mentioned in this thread.

Another point is that, whenever the role play possibility has been mentioned, everyone calls bullshit anyway, because they’ve already decided he’s guilty and want to ruin him.
You should make better use of your mind-reading abilities.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,554
Of course not. But this perspective that false accusations are a huge issue is so tiring.
Don’t believe I said huge issue, but it is the case that footballers are targets. Which is why you need to follow the law and have appropriate checks and balances.
 

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,385
Location
bin
Always wanted to see the Scottish remake of that famous ballet tbf.
:lol: the Scottish version of anything definitely involves pissing at some point. Maybe something deep fried sitting nearby. Deep fried swan... Mmm.
 

Doracle

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,039
Do you know how hard it is to obtain a conviction in DV or sexual assault cases? Do you think the complainant withdrawing their cooperation leaves any reasonable possibility of a conviction as the standard is beyond a reasonable doubt?

Even harder than making a rational argument about left footed penalty takers I'd say.
But in this case the club is satisfied that he didn’t commit the offences he was charged with. That’s not wording supportive of just a witness not being prepared to cooperative nor is it a reasonable doubt test. The club is saying, categorically, that he is not guilty of those offences.

We can all speculate on what the reason may be for the club coming to that conclusion but we cannot argue that is what the club is telling us. It certainly puts the new evidence element of the CPS decision to drop the case well above the lack of witness cooperation to me.
 

Ainu

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2008
Messages
10,155
Location
Antwerp, Belgium
That is certainly true that victims sometimes stay with abuser. Can we say it is the case here for sure? We cannot.
On this at least you're right, we don't know what happened. Only thing we can do is hope there was a genuine reconciliation and they are in a healthy relationship right now. We can't just assume that is the case though, or safely conclude that she has made up her mind to move on with him, some caution is needed. Better that we don't speculate about it at all.
 

Real Name

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2020
Messages
14,355
Location
Croatia
Sorry folks. I was going to post another opinion about this situation but when I was 15 I got drunk down the park with my mates and pissed in a lake beside some swans, so I'm not allowed to say anything now.
Maybe it was a role play so you're good.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,654
Supports
Mejbri
If we start thinking what the club should have done then there are lots of options like d) do what they did today when the criminal case was dropped.

I'm not sure that will be useful or calm the current situation down.
Fair enough. I haven't read through this thread at all so you could say I'm not aware of the dumpster fire this probably is.
 

Kinsella

Copy & Paste Merchant
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
2,775
He made an observation and made it sound like a fact when he said "everybody noticed" then to end his sentence with "I am not going to generelise". Read his statement again.
His observation is so noticeable that it’s become a kind of meme.
 

peridigm

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
13,906
I'm a firm believer in second chances and that people can learn to be better. Shunning criminals is not helpful on a societal level, but (succesful) rehabilitation is. I also believe the club has a moral responsibility to aid people affiliated with the club, something which I think we generally do fairly well.

HOWEVER, Greenwood is a repeat offender, or at the very least a repeat douchebag (hippy crack episodes, and sneaking away on Iceland). There has to be some level of consequences, and 2 years away from football + a torrent of online abuse and hatred is probably quite a punishment already. I think the right step forwards would be a proper counseling/treatment program and treatment, to take real ownership and accountability for his actions, and grow and move on. That has to be dealt with before we can talk about any return to football. The club were in a unique position to take a strong stance on the issue of domestic violence and how to deal with it. Could just be a result of poor communication from the club, but it doesn't feel like the real issue has been dealt with at all.
Agree, but is the club really in a position to demand he go through treatment if there is no way back into the squad? I mean, he could just say that's alright, I'll go somewhere else.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,353
Do you know how hard it is to obtain a conviction in DV or sexual assault cases? Do you think the complainant withdrawing their cooperation leaves any reasonable possibility of a conviction as the standard is beyond a reasonable doubt?

Even harder than making a rational argument about left footed penalty takers I'd say.
Why do you keep ignoring that the CPS said there was new evidence? It was not just that the complainant withdrew her cooperation. Nobody outside the CPS knows what that new evidence is, possibly not even the club.

The difficulties of prosecuting DV and SA cases don't really apply here as there is a direct recording of the event. If that was as conclusive as we all first thought they would not need her cooperation, which suggests there is a lot more to it than the 1 minute clip we all heard.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,304
Location
Centreback
But in this case the club is satisfied that he didn’t commit the offences he was charged with. That’s not wording supportive of just a witness not being prepared to cooperative nor is it a reasonable doubt test. The club is saying, categorically, that he is not guilty of those offences.

We can all speculate on what the reason may be for the club coming to that conclusion but we cannot argue that is what the club is telling us. It certainly puts the new evidence element of the CPS decision to drop the case well above the lack of witness cooperation to me.
Don't be naive. The statement was obviously a multiple lawyer created statement that would be foolish to read literally.
 

UnofficialDevil

Anti Scottish and Preoccupied with Donkeys.
Joined
Aug 5, 2006
Messages
19,096
Location
I'm not anti Scottish, I just wanted Moyes out.
"Dear fans,"

"the evidence we did collate led us to conclude that Mason did not commit the acts he was charged with."

"• We were provided with alternative explanations for the audio recording, which was a short excerpt from a much longer recording, and for the images posted online."


This is key to me. It should be made public, so we can all know what happened that night.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,304
Location
Centreback
Why do you keep ignoring that the CPS said there was new evidence? It was not just that the complainant withdrew her cooperation. Nobody outside the CPS knows what that new evidence is, possibly not even the club.

The difficulties of prosecuting DV and SA cases don't really apply here as there is a direct recording of the event. If that was as conclusive as we all first thought they would not need her cooperation, which suggests there is a lot more to it than the 1 minute clip we all heard.
Do you really believe that the withdrawing of cooperation and this new evidence are unconnected?
 

antk

Full Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2021
Messages
810
But in this case the club is satisfied that he didn’t commit the offences he was charged with. That’s not wording supportive of just a witness not being prepared to cooperative nor is it a reasonable doubt test. The club is saying, categorically, that he is not guilty of those offences.

We can all speculate on what the reason may be for the club coming to that conclusion but we cannot argue that is what the club is telling us. It certainly puts the new evidence element of the CPS decision to drop the case well above the lack of witness cooperation to me.
The club has a vested interest in the outside world believing in Greenwood not being guilty, as there's still an opportunity to extract value from his contract. They can say whatever they want.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,654
Supports
Mejbri
"Dear fans,"

"the evidence we did collate led us to conclude that Mason did not commit the acts he was charged with."

"• We were provided with alternative explanations for the audio recording, which was a short excerpt from a much longer recording, and for the images posted online."


This is key to me. It should be made public, so we can all know what happened that night.
That does not protect the alleged victim's right to anonymity and it may do their young family greater overall harm for all we know.
 

Rainy nights in Stoke

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 15, 2022
Messages
72
Agree, but is the club really in a position to demand he go through treatment if there is no way back into the squad? I mean, he could just say that's alright, I'll go somewhere else.
At this point it's probably too late, but couldn't something like that have been discussed and agreed a long time ago? Kind of like "for there to be any way back into the team for you, we expect you to undergo counseling and treatment XYZ. We will help you get the support and follow-up you need and want to see a detailed plan". I don't know what legal restrictions exist to talk about such things in the public domain, but this could have become a best practice case example for offenders, victims and employers on how to deal with domestic abuse (if you, like me, believe counseling a rehabilitation works).
 

Hal9000

Full Member
Joined
May 24, 2010
Messages
6,319
That does not protect the alleged victim's right to anonymity and it may do their young family greater overall harm for all we know.
Yeah, imagine the what would happen if it turned out, as rumored, to be some sex game/roleplay/kink. She would get villified online.
 

Giggsy13

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2016
Messages
4,367
Location
Toronto
"Dear fans,"

"the evidence we did collate led us to conclude that Mason did not commit the acts he was charged with."

"• We were provided with alternative explanations for the audio recording, which was a short excerpt from a much longer recording, and for the images posted online."


This is key to me. It should be made public, so we can all know what happened that night.
Perhaps Greenwood, his partner and their families are tired of having the public scrutinize and pass judgement on their situation. We do not have the right to view any additional information and I’m certain they’re happy keeping it to themselves. Greenwood will move on and have a great career elsewhere and we would have lost our greatest talent to come out of the academy in two decades.
 

Laurencio

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2017
Messages
3,219
"Dear fans,"

"the evidence we did collate led us to conclude that Mason did not commit the acts he was charged with."

"• We were provided with alternative explanations for the audio recording, which was a short excerpt from a much longer recording, and for the images posted online."


This is key to me. It should be made public, so we can all know what happened that night.
To what end? He's being removed from the club after their own internal investigation. It's not like publicly releasing a longer audio with similar language will be particularly helpful. A lot of people seem to be sure it will prove something completely innocent, while it is just as likely that it will just be a recording of nasty words followed by a storming out - and therefore the rape accusation in this very specific instance would be inaccurate.

Nothing good comes from dwelling on this case. The club made a decision that doesn't require public justification and will try to move Mason somewhere else. Hell he might make 10x what he could make here in the Saudi League.
 

duffer

Sensible and not a complete jerk like most oppo's
Scout
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
50,575
Location
Chelsea (the saviours of football) fan.
Yeah, imagine the what would happen if it turned out, as rumored, to be some sex game/roleplay/kink. She would get villified online.
If they'd released a joint statement a few days after the audio and pics were released saying "this is embarrassing but we are consenting adults who were messing about." There would be a lot of joking and memeing online but he'd have been back in the squad the next match day and nobody would give a shit.

She wouldn't get villified at all.
 

Oldyella

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
5,914
"Dear fans,"

"the evidence we did collate led us to conclude that Mason did not commit the acts he was charged with."

"• We were provided with alternative explanations for the audio recording, which was a short excerpt from a much longer recording, and for the images posted online."


This is key to me. It should be made public, so we can all know what happened that night.
People keep saying this, but the alleged victim has a right to anonymity.
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,651
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
"Dear fans,"

"the evidence we did collate led us to conclude that Mason did not commit the acts he was charged with."

"• We were provided with alternative explanations for the audio recording, which was a short excerpt from a much longer recording, and for the images posted online."


This is key to me. It should be made public, so we can all know what happened that night.
You don't need to know. We don't need to know. Furthermore, the people at the center of this would rather we not. And they don't owe us that.
 

Ainu

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2008
Messages
10,155
Location
Antwerp, Belgium
Yeah, imagine the what would happen if it turned out, as rumored, to be some sex game/roleplay/kink. She would get villified online.
That call that "as rumoured" feels like a serious misrepresentation. Some people suggested it or want to believe it, let's keep it at that.
 

Real Name

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2020
Messages
14,355
Location
Croatia
Perhaps Greenwood, his partner and their families are tired of having the public scrutinize and pass judgement on their situation. We do not have the right to view any additional information and I’m certain they’re happy keeping it to themselves. Greenwood will move on and have a great career elsewhere and we would have lost our greatest talent to come out of the academy in two decades.
Yup. You're right, keep it in the family, in their 4 walls. What happens there stays there, right.
 

FromTheBench

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2014
Messages
10,479
People keep saying this, but the alleged victim has a right to anonymity.
Exactly and they keep forgetting they are still in a relationship and have a baby together.

U want mudslinging or what? And spoil their lives?
 

Member 125288

Guest
There is no anonymity though as they are married with a child and everybody knows who the alleged victim is.
Everyone knowing who the victim is is not the same as her being publicly named by an entity that then opens itself up to legal consequences.
 

UnofficialDevil

Anti Scottish and Preoccupied with Donkeys.
Joined
Aug 5, 2006
Messages
19,096
Location
I'm not anti Scottish, I just wanted Moyes out.
Perhaps Greenwood, his partner and their families are tired of having the public scrutinize and pass judgement on their situation. We do not have the right to view any additional information and I’m certain they’re happy keeping it to themselves. Greenwood will move on and have a great career elsewhere and we would have lost our greatest talent to come out of the academy in two decades.
Greenwood will get scrutinized and judged for the rest of his life if there is a different truth that never gets out, we don't know if there is, but that is what the club is saying. And what about their child when it grows up? Your father is this, your father is that. If he didn't do it, show us the evidence. Otherwise, every one can rightfully assume he did.
 

Raven

Full Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Messages
6,770
Location
Ireland
He was not the finished product - imo, he had room and potential to get a lot better - he’d also featured as striker/leading the line a couple times rather than playing on the right and did really well with back to goal and link-up play. He was becoming a more rounded player rather than cutting in and firing off.
I disagree, I think he was trash up top. He had some good form on the right in fairness and clearly possessed a high level of natural talent but I don't this he was ever truly going to make it to the top because of his shitty attitude.
 

P-Ro

"Full Member"
Joined
Nov 21, 2014
Messages
11,416
Location
Salford
Supports
Chelsea and AFC Wimbledon
If you were a perfect 19 year old then congrats.
I think you're being a bit too kind to Greenwood. Most of us grew out of the whole beating women and threatening them with rape** by the time we turned 18.

**Allegedly
 
Last edited: