I have noticed Neville's at pains to appear unbiased, I don't think that's even up for debate. I think it's understandable how he's got himself into a bit of a tangle, and I don't think it points to anything particularly egregious about his character. The worst thing about Sky/Talk/News Corp pundits generally is when they buy into the 'shock jock' tendency of saying controversial things and contriving arguments for clicks and views. Neville has become an absolute company man and that's on the whole more irritating to me than anything he says about United. But again it's understandable, he's there to do the job they've hired him to do.
There's an interesting broader discussion to be had about the different jobs in football, and the levels of partisanship therein. Neville and Carragher have managed to rein their love for their clubs in, to the extent that parts of those fanbases now actively hate them, whereas the likes of Paddy Crerand and Mike Summerbee would be or have been sickening to listen to on a matchday broadcaster like Sky or TNT and are only really at home on in-house channels like MUTV where they can pretty much be propagandists for their club.
He didn’t say he’s likely to go down, he said you couldn’t blame Cash for diving which is a ridiculous statement.
plus there’s an in between from sounding delighted to crying about their equaliser. Just compare him to Carragher commentating on Liverpool when they concede, nobody had a problem with Jamie so there’s no need to go so far the other way.
Alan Smith was basically pulling himself off commentating on West Ham v Arsenal earlier
But who wants to hear that? And plenty of scousers have precisely the same issue with Carragher.