Was surprised too:Something has certainly happened, of course we never really know what's really going on in the world of intelligence.
Le Pen on board too though... What?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Was surprised too:Something has certainly happened, of course we never really know what's really going on in the world of intelligence.
Le Pen on board too though... What?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
https://apnews.com/article/france-macron-ukraine-troops-caa788d2455dafb06dd87f79c4afe06fPARIS (AP) — French President Emmanuel Macron reiterated Thursday his position that sending Western troops into Ukraine should not be ruled out, but said that today’s situation doesn’t require that.
“We’re not in that situation today,” he said, but added that “all these options are possible.”
https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-weapons-fund-ukraine-war/BRUSSELS — Europe's new €5 billion fund for Ukraine was lauded as a big win for Kyiv, but the program is more of an accounting procedure than an actual pile of cash.
I agree, nobody should expect to see European troops in Ukraine anytime soon, it ain't happening. It is still an important change in rhetoric though and shows at least one EU leader is taking the situation as seriously as it should be, hopefully that influence spreads.Meh, I'd be wary of exaggerating Macron's rhetoric. Here's the usual "but now is not the moment" disclaimer.
https://apnews.com/article/france-macron-ukraine-troops-caa788d2455dafb06dd87f79c4afe06f
If that carries on, it would be the largest pan-European coalition to make a stand against one single enemy since the Seventh Coalition fought against Napoleon in 1815.Finally we have a proper coalition in Europe (France/UK/Poland/Czech/ Romania/Nordics/Baltics).
feck, I thought shit was going to get down and France grew a pair. Disappointing ....or not. Who I am to be disappointed for not sending french people to die in a war that I am following through the screen?Meh, I'd be wary of exaggerating Macron's rhetoric. Here's the usual "but now is not the moment" disclaimer.
https://apnews.com/article/france-macron-ukraine-troops-caa788d2455dafb06dd87f79c4afe06f
France could spread the rhetoric sending more arms to Ukraine at the same level as Germany or UK. They are far behind compared to the other 2 strongest economies in EuropeI agree, nobody should expect to see European troops in Ukraine anytime soon, it ain't happening. It is still an important change in rhetoric though and shows at least one EU leader is taking the situation as seriously as it should be, hopefully that influence spreads.
Yeah, one would hope that's what it leads to.France could spread the rhetoric sending more arms to Ukraine at the same level as Germany or UK. They are far behind compared to the other 2 strongest economies in Europe
Not sure what's going on. There appears to be a Twitter campaign about French troops going to Romania for eventual use in Odesa.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Doubt Germany will follow route. Scholz is a spineless coward.France and Macron going nuclear (literally) right now, finally the penny dropped. Hopefully, we can steer Germany to the good side of the history as well.
After yesterday’s Macron’s performance I would say that risk has greatly diminished. The only way anyone uses nuclear is when you know that you can get away with it.Should I check the state of my building's atomic shelter?
Quite liking that response, its a bit dumb, but dumb questions should always be met in kind.Not sure what's going on. There appears to be a Twitter campaign about French troops going to Romania for eventual use in Odesa.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/15/europe/missile-strike-odesa-russia-ukraine-double-tap-intl/index.htmlA Russian missile strike hit civilian infrastructure in the Ukrainian city of Odesa, killing at least 20 people and injuring scores of others in the deadliest attack on the Black Sea port city since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion, Ukrainian officials said Friday.
That's the expectation, yes. Many articles suggest that 2024 will be a rebuilding year for Ukraine so that they can launch a new offensive in 2025.I fear this spring summer we might see a russian offensive more than the other way around
This is basically the same thing Putin did in Syria for years, killing many among the "White Helmets" and other people coming in to help civilians in need.At least 20 killed and scores injured in Russian ‘double tap’ missile strike on Odesa
https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/15/europe/missile-strike-odesa-russia-ukraine-double-tap-intl/index.html
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This could've gone terribly wrong for the Ukrainians in the trench if the whoever was firing towards the Russians mistook the already entrenched Ukrainians for the enemy.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Sure, try to run over a trench with a tank. I have a lot of success myself doing that while I'm playing Enlisted or War Thunder... not.
You'd assume they were on the blower to the artillery/ drone guys and it's not just chance as to where they were firing.This could've gone terribly wrong for the Ukrainians in the trench if the whoever was firing towards the Russians mistook the already entrenched Ukrainians for the enemy.
Great stuff, hit them where it hurts. Price of fuel will be crazy in Russia if they kept taking these out you'd imagine.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Moscow airport also been hit with multiple drones this morning.
I'm baffled as to why the Ukrainians haven't just walked into Transnistria and routed the Russians, who mostly have a police presence there. They could give it back to the Moldovans and eliminate the possibility of a potential western staging point for the Russians to attack Odesa at a later date.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I don't think that would fly. Even if Moldova formally asks for it, I'm not sure it's a priority for Ukraine and possibly the West wouldn't accept it either.I'm baffled as to why the Ukrainians haven't just walked into Transnistria and routed the Russians, who mostly have a police presence there. They could give it back to the Moldovans and eliminate the possibility of a potential western staging point for the Russians to attack Odesa at a later date.
The west wouldn't have a say in the matter. The Ukrainians would simply be taking out a potential staging point for an attack on them from an area that doesn't belong to Russia in the first place.I don't think that would fly. Even if Moldova formally asks for it, I'm not sure it's a priority for Ukraine and possibly the West wouldn't accept it either.
Ukraine would have to explain itself to the international community for why they conduct an offensive military operation into Transnistria. I doubt they want that diplomatic heat.The west wouldn't have a say in the matter. The Ukrainians would simply be taking out a potential staging point for an attack on them from an area that doesn't belong to Russia in the first place.
This kind of rhetoric makes much more sense in the world where Ukraine is undertaking an independent war effort.The west wouldn't have a say in the matter. The Ukrainians would simply be taking out a potential staging point for an attack on them from an area that doesn't belong to Russia in the first place.
Transnistria belongs to Moldova, so unless they object to booting the Russians out and returning their land to Moldovan control, there wouldn't be any explaining to do, especially since Moldova isn't in NATO. Transnistria isn't some benign territory that can't be used against the Ukrainians in the future and removing it from under Putin's thumb would inflict a cost on the Russians.Ukraine would have to explain itself to the international community for why they conduct an offensive military operation into Transnistria. I doubt they want that diplomatic heat.
Regardless of Transnistria's legal status, I don't think the Ukrainians are interested in it as long as Russia doesn't stage an attack out of Transnistria.
And when that happens, Ukraine would be well placed to remove the threat from Transnistria. They'd probably see it coming anyway, with support of Western intel agencies.Transnistria belongs to Moldova, so unless they object to booting the Russians out and returning their land to Moldovan control, there wouldn't be any explaining to do, especially since Moldova isn't in NATO. Transnistria isn't some benign territory that can't be used against the Ukrainians in the future and removing it from under Putin's thumb would inflict a cost on the Russians.
Now that answers what I previously asked about whether or not Ukraine would receive new choppers other than the Mi-8s and Mi-17s from Croatia and the US.
Moldova doesn't want war on it's territory, which Transnistria is. And so far Ukraine respected that.Transnistria belongs to Moldova, so unless they object to booting the Russians out and returning their land to Moldovan control, there wouldn't be any explaining to do, especially since Moldova isn't in NATO. Transnistria isn't some benign territory that can't be used against the Ukrainians in the future and removing it from under Putin's thumb would inflict a cost on the Russians.