I may as well get on train for now, need someone to muppet over. Even though I know it would take an unbelievable sell from Ruben to convince him without CLGyokeres is probably off to Chelsea.
So can Hojlund to be fair although he regressed horribly in his second season. Initially when Amorim was appointed there was quite a lot of optimism about how Hojlund would fare in his system precisely because he is a very similar player to Gyokeres and had actually shown more at a younger age. Of course it did not work out as hoped but it does suggest that Gyokeres in the PL may not be the sure thing some people believe. Ugarte played for Amorim in Portugal and it is becoming increasingly obvious that he does not fancy him at all in this league.Not quite. Gyokeres can actually score goals and finish with both his feet.
Well him staying is better than going to Arsenal or dare I even contemplate him following Delap to ChelseaHe’s not coming to us, he’s not going to turn down Arsenal to sign for us. It just doesn’t make sense as sad as it is to write that.
For whatever reason I reckon he’s just happy at Sporting for another year.
It's a stinker
Would take Osimhen or him, however in our situation I think best hope is to get Mbeumo then look at strikers when we have sold a couple of attackersBELIEVE! Remember how we pulled off Yoro. This will happen
It's a stinker
I actually don’t think aerial goals are a big part of Amorim’s system… he wins about 50% of duels, but he’s in the 16th percentile of aerials won. Which tells me the system doesn’t create a lot of aerial balls into the box.Based on what I've seen:
He wins a decent amount of his aerial duels, but he doesn't go up for much. And he is not much of an aerial threat in the box. He doesn't seem like a striker that puts himself about when the ball is in the air.
Yes. He's strong, and holds off defenders well. Turns well on the ball to drive forwards too.
Not the most secure, but not many out and out strikers are.
That is his biggest strength. Most of his goals come after holding off defenders for a considerable time and distance. But he plays in the Portuguese league, so should be taken with a pinch of salt.
I haven't seen enough evidence that suggests it is a strength of his. Infact, it is my biggest concern about him. I rarely see him connecting with crosses in compilations. I'm yet to figure out if it has anything to do with Sporting not putting in many crosses or something else.
Marco Polo's grand grand grandchildI dont have any clue who Marco Alcazar is, but I fully trust him.
BELIEVE! Remember how we pulled off Yoro. This will happen
I'd take him in a heartbeat, but leave that fecking shite celebration in Portugal.
Doesn't bother me about little heading abilityWow! I was really all about Chelsea getting him. I was reading he is not great against low blocks and teams seem to go to that to counter Maresca. It is really shaping up that Sesko is going to be the top striker this window. Unless Osimhen comes to the Premier League
More chance of getting relegated with a striker who scores 4 goals in 32 games. 4 goals?!?!?I’m not sure, but he’s better than what we have. I can tell you this, another season with Hojlund as our first choice striker and we won’t crack top 10.
Heresy!
Do you still believe that now?As I said we probably had this in the bag a long time ago. Gentlemean agreement. We get Gyokeres as long as Ruben promises not to sign any more of their players. They don't want us to Ten Hag them.
Of course. I still believe he either stays or goes to United.Do you still believe that now?
So if you had to put a % on both sidesOf course. I still believe he either stays or goes to United.
Chelsea fan on here was put off by his heading videoNot keeping up with the transfer news as much but I'm surprised teams seem to be prioritising other forwards over him?
He looks the best of the bunch to me
It's a stinker
That video was shocking. This is what is more concerning. If he has no ability to be dominant in the box, sounds like a recipe for underwhelming in the Premier League. He is going to face a lot of low block defenses. I hope you get him.Chelsea fan on here was put off by his heading video
Viktor Gyökeres, particularly when discussed in the context of Arsenal, is often debated regarding his ability to effectively break down low blocks in football. Some argue that his strengths, like his movement in tight areas and ability to create shots from close range, make him a good fit for unlocking compact defenses. Others point to his less impressive aerial ability and the potential for him to struggle against teams that predominantly play a low block, especially if they are more physically imposing.
60 staying : 40 United.So if you had to put a % on both sides
Exactly. Delap, Osihmen, Sesko, whoever we CAN get, gotta be better than HojlundMore chance of getting relegated with a striker who scores 4 goals in 32 games. 4 goals?!?!?
The thing with Gyokeres though is he’s built like a tank. Similar to Haaland. He’s a lot more physical than Hojlund, he has a lot better hold up play, has better dribbling and he can create goals on his own. We don’t see that with HojlundSo can Hojlund to be fair although he regressed horribly in his second season. Initially when Amorim was appointed there was quite a lot of optimism about how Hojlund would fare in his system precisely because he is a very similar player to Gyokeres and had actually shown more at a younger age. Of course it did not work out as hoped but it does suggest that Gyokeres in the PL may not be the sure thing some people believe. Ugarte played for Amorim in Portugal and it is becoming increasingly obvious that he does not fancy him at all in this league.
The thing with Gyokeres though is he’s built like a tank. Similar to Haaland. He’s a lot more physical than Hojlund, he has a lot better hold up play, has better dribbling and he can create goals on his own. We don’t see that with Hojlund
And we know how physique doesn't mean strength. Hojlund falls too easily and rarely wins the ball against a competent PL defender. He becomes more like a foul beggar than to use his strength and build to win duels. Gyokeres has that grit to win duels than moaning for fouls. I believe someone like Amad would put more fight up front than Hojlund. Anything is an improvement over him at this point.The thing with Gyokeres though is he’s built like a tank. Similar to Haaland. He’s a lot more physical than Hojlund, he has a lot better hold up play, has better dribbling and he can create goals on his own. We don’t see that with Hojlund
Twice as many games than shots. Pound for pound the worst forward in Europe. I don't think he would have had a sniff of our 1st team if he was an academy player but cost us more than a Carrington upgrade. We look look like fecking idiots because we are broke for being fecking idiots.More chance of getting relegated with a striker who scores 4 goals in 32 games. 4 goals?!?!?
Would people here prefer Højlund gone and Osimhen in, or Gyokeres in and stuck with Højlund
At this point sure, he is what Hojlund could and should become. Gyokeres in his early twenties was a failed Championship player playing at a lower level than Rasmus with even less success. I don’t say this to claim Hojlund will suddenly blossom as not every player is the same but to point out that the evolution of Gyokeres may not be all that we think it is. So far Amorim has given not even the slightest indication that he has any desire to reunite with Gyokeres which is a bit of a red flag. He obviously knows him extremely well and yet was perfectly happy for the club to chase Delap and not stand on the table for someone presumed to be his guy and available for just 20M more.The thing with Gyokeres though is he’s built like a tank. Similar to Haaland. He’s a lot more physical than Hojlund, he has a lot better hold up play, has better dribbling and he can create goals on his own. We don’t see that with Hojlund
But do we know for sure Amorim wanted Delap or was that a Wilcox decision? Obviously the manager would have had a say but Delap may not have been his first choice. I mean let’s be honest if we got into the CL we’d be chasing Osihmen/Gyokeres anyway. So if we still end up going after Gyokeres then it shows he was one of the plans whether it’s plan A or plan B. Plus we have tried to move away from signing managers former players so they might have told Amorim that since it didn’t work out with ETHAt this point sure, he is what Hojlund could and should become. Gyokeres in his early twenties was a failed Championship player playing at a lower level than Rasmus with even less success. I don’t say this to claim Hojlund will suddenly blossom as not every player is the same but to point out that the evolution of Gyokeres may not be all that we think it is. So far Amorim has given not even the slightest indication that he has any desire to reunite with Gyokeres which is a bit of a red flag. He obviously knows him extremely well and yet was perfectly happy for the club to chase Delap and not stand on the table for someone presumed to be his guy and available for just 20M more.
£60m is not going to land you the second coming of Marco Van Basten or even Harry Kane. There's a leap of faith in that bracket, like Newcastle took with Isak, who had just 6 goals in 32 games in his last La Liga season yet went for £63m(?) based on skill and potential.An almost 27 years old who is plying is trade in Portugal the last two seasons and before that was in the championship. Plus, he played under the current manager in the Portugal.
Has this guy really grown into a player that can command such a high fee and lead the line for Manchester United with all the pressure it brings?
£60m is not going to land you the second coming of Marco Van Basten or even Harry Kane. There's a leap of faith in that bracket, like Newcastle took with Isak, who had just 6 goals in 32 games in his last La Liga season yet went for £63m(?) based on skill and potential.
The same leap of faith is being taken with Sesko by any suitor who matches the valuation put on him right now, and he'll cost a lot more than Gyökeres on top of that.
If Gyökeres were as complete and as prolific as posters in here seem to want him to be, he would not be available for c. £60m.
You look at him as is and try and ascertain how he fits in with your team and the needs of the coach's style of play.
£60m is the bracket of player good for 15 PL goals a season. That's Gyökeres minimum expectation here for that price; the question to answer is whether he's good for it or not.