nickm
Full Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2001
- Messages
- 9,817
I don't agree with some of the comments in this thread, but I do think that it is a matter of reasonable discussion since the family has made it a public issue.
It was the /paper/ that first made the McCann's reputation a public issue when they published the original allegation!
The only matter of reasonable discussion is, "what is the evidence for the paper's allegations, and who is the source for these allegations." Everybody has been /very/ quick to ascribe malign motives to the McCanns for /responding/ to having their good names publicly dragged through the mud, but nobody here has spent a femtosecond actually discussing the allegations in the report.
Which, since we are talking about what's reasonable, seems a bit of a massive omission to me.