ehsanul
Bestower of favours
The days from Dj2 bellion and kleberson really times changes,credit to fergie and utd for turning things around,i really cant see a more belter of a squad in europe now than us...
I'll be smashed for saying this, but also kudos to the Glazers for not being hesitant on the transfer front. They let the football people do their jobs, and by allowing discretionary signings, the nature take its course.The days from Dj2 bellion and kleberson really times changes,credit to fergie and utd for turning things around,i really cant see a more belter of a squad in europe now than us...
so yesterday our squad was shit?The days from Dj2 bellion and kleberson really times changes,credit to fergie and utd for turning things around,i really cant see a more belter of a squad in europe now than us...
feck fergie, I think it's all you enhusal. When you joined this forum in 2004 our squad was the joke of all europe. But you persistantly posted articles from tribal football and clubcall until the bosses upstairs took notice. Sure you pissed everyone off with your constant posting of spam, duplicate threads and putting stuff in the wrong forum, and your run ins with Goldem Blunder were legendary, like the time you told him that a article you posted about us signing Stewart Downing was United Forum related because we were playing them next week, but it paid off in the end.The days from Dj2 bellion and kleberson really times changes,credit to fergie and utd for turning things around,i really cant see a more belter of a squad in europe now than us...
feck fergie, I think it's all you enhusal. When you joined this forum in 2004 our squad was the joke of all europe. But you persistantly posted articles from tribal football and clubcall until the bosses upstairs took notice. Sure you pissed everyone off with your constant posting of spam, duplicate threads and putting stuff in the wrong forum, and your run ins with Goldem Blunder were legendary, like the time you told him that a article you posted about us signing Stewart Downing was United Forum related because we were playing them next week, but it paid off in the end.
Because of you we now have the greatest squad in the history of the multiverse, ever. But at the same time I feel for you en. What are you going to do now? Heaven forbid you might actually stop playing FM and reading sites like transferumours.com and actually watch a full game of football. Wouldn't that be nice?
It wasn't shit,not by a long way,but now the squad is fully complete...We have options in every position now...so yesterday our squad was shit?
feck fergie, I think it's all you enhusal. When you joined this forum in 2004 our squad was the joke of all europe. But you persistantly posted articles from tribal football and clubcall until the bosses upstairs took notice. Sure you pissed everyone off with your constant posting of spam, duplicate threads and putting stuff in the wrong forum, and your run ins with Goldem Blunder were legendary, like the time you told him that a article you posted about us signing Stewart Downing was United Forum related because we were playing them next week, but it paid off in the end.
Because of you we now have the greatest squad in the history of the multiverse, ever. But at the same time I feel for you en. What are you going to do now? Heaven forbid you might actually stop playing FM and reading sites like transferumours.com and actually watch a full game of football. Wouldn't that be nice?
no , but its better nowso yesterday our squad was shit?
feck fergie, I think it's all you enhusal. When you joined this forum in 2004 our squad was the joke of all europe. But you persistantly posted articles from tribal football and clubcall until the bosses upstairs took notice. Sure you pissed everyone off with your constant posting of spam, duplicate threads and putting stuff in the wrong forum, and your run ins with Goldem Blunder were legendary, like the time you told him that a article you posted about us signing Stewart Downing was United Forum related because we were playing them next week, but it paid off in the end.
Because of you we now have the greatest squad in the history of the multiverse, ever. But at the same time I feel for you en. What are you going to do now? Heaven forbid you might actually stop playing FM and reading sites like transferumours.com and actually watch a full game of football. Wouldn't that be nice?
I'd say their squad is slightly better, but we've got FergieCentre midfield a draw? That's ridiculous. Their centre-mid's miles better. We've got excellent players, but they've got by far the best range of centre midfielders in the world.
Essien, Ballack, Deco, Lampard...that's unbelievable.
Defenses are even: they've got the best goalie in the world. We've both got great centre-halves, ours slightly better. Evra's better than any of their full-backs, but Cole and Bosingwa are both better than Wesley and probably Gaz.
We've got miles better wingers - but then, they don't play with wingers - and miles better strikers. So I'd say we shade it, but not by much.
Yea, was thinking similarly. I'd say their central midfield is better. The squads are very closely matched though, i'd say we just shade it.Lot_49, not giving Chelsea the midfield is a bit biased. Nothing against ours, but Essien is probably the best midfielder of his kind in the world right now, Deco is looking like a great buy, Ballack on his day is very hard to control and Lampard knows his stuff in the PL.
Until Anderson grows into the player we know he can become, and Hargreaves plays on a consistant basis, I think we have to give them that one. Carrick is IMO our best midfielder and Scholes, although still fantastic, is on the wrong side of 30 even more so than Drogba.
Scholes isn't better than Deco, at least not now. I know i'll get the usual bollocking for that statement, but truthfully, why is he better?My thinking on the centre midfielders was that:
Essien is amazing and better than anyone we have right now and in the conceivable future. Even though Chelsea tend to waste him slightly as a defensive midfielder he is still far better than Hargreaves.
Scholes is marginally better than Deco.
Lampard and Ballack are 30+ and are declining, Lampard wasn't quite as good as he normally is last season and Ballack has never been as good as in the premiership as he was in Germany. In contrast Carrick was our best midfielder last season and Anderson should kick on another gear as well, I reckon our two players will show themselves to be better than the two Chelsea players this year.
Mikel is a better player than Fletcher but neither will play that regularly so it's not that important.
AgreedCentre midfield a draw? That's ridiculous. Their centre-mid's miles better. We've got excellent players, but they've got by far the best range of centre midfielders in the world.
Essien, Ballack, Deco, Lampard, Cole, Mikel...that's unbelievable
Defences are even: they've got the best goalie in the world. We've both got great centre-halves, ours slightly better. Evra's better than any of their full-backs, but Cole and Bosingwa are both better than Wesley and probably Gaz.
We've got miles better wingers - but then, they don't play with wingers - and miles better strikers. So I'd say we shade it, but not by much.
Utter bollocks. FFS you're so clueless...Scholes isn't better than Deco or Ballack at all. They have the same level.
He's proven a vital part of this team, is well settled in, and knows our playing style perfectly. Deco is yet to settle in yet, and even though he got off to a good start he will need to familiarize himself with the team a lot more before becoming as important to Chelsea as Scholes is to Manchester United.Scholes isn't better than Deco, at least not now. I know i'll get the usual bollocking for that statement, but truthfully, why is he better?
Essien isn't better than Paul Scholes...My thinking on the centre midfielders was that:
Essien is amazing and better than anyone we have right now and in the conceivable future. Even though Chelsea tend to waste him slightly as a defensive midfielder he is still far better than Hargreaves.
Scholes is marginally better than Deco.
Lampard and Ballack are 30+ and are declining, Lampard wasn't quite as good as he normally is last season and Ballack has never been as good as in the premiership as he was in Germany. In contrast Carrick was our best midfielder last season and Anderson should kick on another gear as well, I reckon our two players will show themselves to be better than the two Chelsea players this year.
Mikel is a better player than Fletcher but neither will play that regularly so it's not that important.
He is far better in general defensive terms which allows him to play in a successful 4-4-2 team which Deco hasn't been capable of doing in years (if he ever was, I've only followed him since his Porto days). I would also say his reading of the game is better and he's a better long passer.Scholes isn't better than Deco, at least not now. I know i'll get the usual bollocking for that statement, but truthfully, why is he better?
That's not really a fair argument though. I know it is an extreme, but had Chelsea signed Messi, we could safely say he was better than all of our wingers, perhaps bar Ronaldo.He's proven a vital part of this team, is well settled in, and knows our playing style perfectly. Deco is yet to settle in yet, and even though he got off to a good start he will need to familiarize himself with the team a lot more before becoming as important to Chelsea as Scholes is to Manchester United.
What if his team doesn't want to play 4-4-2? You can't call Scholes better because he is better defensively in a 4-4-2, there is more than one way to play the game.He is far better in general defensive terms which allows him to play in a successful 4-4-2 team which Deco hasn't been capable of doing in years (if he ever was, I've only followed him since his Porto days). I would also say his reading of the game is better and he's a better long passer.
Deco is certainly an excellent player and has better technical ability than Scholes and can actually dribble/run with the ball a bit but overall I think Scholes is better, although only marginally as I said.
Deco is also better at diving.
The 4-4-2 was just an example. It's the whole being far better defensively that I was using to explain why I think he's a better player.What if his team doesn't want to play 4-4-2? You can't call Scholes better because he is better defensively in a 4-4-2, there is more than one way to play the game.
That would be my analysis as well. Though I think they are missing a proper winger in their squad. Someone who can take on players and dribble past 3-4 players. Someone like Robinhio.Centre midfield a draw? That's ridiculous. Their centre-mid's miles better. We've got excellent players, but they've got by far the best range of centre midfielders in the world.
Essien, Ballack, Deco, Lampard, Cole, Mikel...that's unbelievable
Defences are even: they've got the best goalie in the world. We've both got great centre-halves, ours slightly better. Evra's better than any of their full-backs, but Cole and Bosingwa are both better than Wesley and probably Gaz.
We've got miles better wingers - but then, they don't play with wingers - and miles better strikers. So I'd say we shade it, but not by much.
Of course he fecking is.Essien isn't better than Paul Scholes...
Fine. In terms of ability, Scholes still edges it. Actually, he's just plainly a better player, he doesn't edge anything.That's not really a fair argument though. I know it is an extreme, but had Chelsea signed Messi, we could safely say he was better than all of our wingers, perhaps bar Ronaldo.
The fact is, Deco is not an unknown quantity, and can be compared to Scholes in the same way Pirlo can, they don't need to play in the same league for a number of years. Otherwise Scholes simply wins by default, and generally, whichever team buys the most new players is the weaker of the two then?
Different type of players. But if we separate Scholes the United legend from the player, I would swap him Essien for sure.Essien isn't better than Paul Scholes...
Did you see some of Scholes passes last friday? That's something Essien could never do. Scholes is a footballers' footballer.Different type of players. But if we separate Scholes the United legend from the player, I would swap him Essien for sure.
And there is not much between Deco and Scholes either and I say that when Scholes is my current fav player and Deco one of the most hated. Infact given Deco still have legs to get in the box, he probably edges it. There is still a chance Deco will bottle it in the winters, so let's wait and see.
Technically, Scholes is something else. I'd go as far as to say that his ball retention and passing is unmatched anywhere else in England.Essien isn't better than Paul Scholes...
Keane could never pass like that as well. I still rank him above Scholes as would most people.Did you see some of Scholes passes last friday? That's something Essien could never do. Scholes is a footballers' footballer.
He's such a dominant CM, that he was played right back last season.Technically, Scholes is something else. I'd go as far as to say that his ball retention and passing is unmatched anywhere else in England.
But let's be honest...we're talking about Michael Essien. His skill level doesn't match that of a Bergkamp or a Scholes, but he's pretty much Roy Keane all over again.
If Berbatov is worth £30m, then the money needed to get this guy could be used to buy an island.