The Squad Right Now

ehsanul

Bestower of favours
Joined
Aug 15, 2004
Messages
5,420
Location
Man utd till i die
The days from Dj2 bellion and kleberson really times changes,credit to fergie and utd for turning things around,i really cant see a more belter of a squad in europe now than us...
 

December_16

Full Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2005
Messages
7,501
Location
Mancunian Way
The days from Dj2 bellion and kleberson really times changes,credit to fergie and utd for turning things around,i really cant see a more belter of a squad in europe now than us...
I'll be smashed for saying this, but also kudos to the Glazers for not being hesitant on the transfer front. They let the football people do their jobs, and by allowing discretionary signings, the nature take its course.
 

Saq

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
2,521
The days from Dj2 bellion and kleberson really times changes,credit to fergie and utd for turning things around,i really cant see a more belter of a squad in europe now than us...
so yesterday our squad was shit?
 

The Hairdryer

Guest
The days from Dj2 bellion and kleberson really times changes,credit to fergie and utd for turning things around,i really cant see a more belter of a squad in europe now than us...
feck fergie, I think it's all you enhusal. When you joined this forum in 2004 our squad was the joke of all europe. But you persistantly posted articles from tribal football and clubcall until the bosses upstairs took notice. Sure you pissed everyone off with your constant posting of spam, duplicate threads and putting stuff in the wrong forum, and your run ins with Goldem Blunder were legendary, like the time you told him that a article you posted about us signing Stewart Downing was United Forum related because we were playing them next week, but it paid off in the end.

Because of you we now have the greatest squad in the history of the multiverse, ever. But at the same time I feel for you en. What are you going to do now? Heaven forbid you might actually stop playing FM and reading sites like transferumours.com and actually watch a full game of football. Wouldn't that be nice?
 

anver

Shart stop
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
5,284
Location
Colombo. Sri-Lanka
Ramadan Mubarak, Ehsanul.

Think you can do a thesis with your knowledge of transfers. Keep the ball rolling.
 

Richter

Hairy big footed Swede
Joined
Oct 19, 2001
Messages
29,853
feck fergie, I think it's all you enhusal. When you joined this forum in 2004 our squad was the joke of all europe. But you persistantly posted articles from tribal football and clubcall until the bosses upstairs took notice. Sure you pissed everyone off with your constant posting of spam, duplicate threads and putting stuff in the wrong forum, and your run ins with Goldem Blunder were legendary, like the time you told him that a article you posted about us signing Stewart Downing was United Forum related because we were playing them next week, but it paid off in the end.

Because of you we now have the greatest squad in the history of the multiverse, ever. But at the same time I feel for you en. What are you going to do now? Heaven forbid you might actually stop playing FM and reading sites like transferumours.com and actually watch a full game of football. Wouldn't that be nice?
:lol:
 

reddevilcanada

Full Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
11,339
feck fergie, I think it's all you enhusal. When you joined this forum in 2004 our squad was the joke of all europe. But you persistantly posted articles from tribal football and clubcall until the bosses upstairs took notice. Sure you pissed everyone off with your constant posting of spam, duplicate threads and putting stuff in the wrong forum, and your run ins with Goldem Blunder were legendary, like the time you told him that a article you posted about us signing Stewart Downing was United Forum related because we were playing them next week, but it paid off in the end.

Because of you we now have the greatest squad in the history of the multiverse, ever. But at the same time I feel for you en. What are you going to do now? Heaven forbid you might actually stop playing FM and reading sites like transferumours.com and actually watch a full game of football. Wouldn't that be nice?
:lol:

All hail the ehsanul revolution!
 

reddevilcanada

Full Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
11,339
I think Fergie is really doing his best to leave a great squad capable of sustained success once he calls it a day, i just hope the next manager we get is half as good as Sir Alex. Well done Fergie.
 

Merman

Guest
feck fergie, I think it's all you enhusal. When you joined this forum in 2004 our squad was the joke of all europe. But you persistantly posted articles from tribal football and clubcall until the bosses upstairs took notice. Sure you pissed everyone off with your constant posting of spam, duplicate threads and putting stuff in the wrong forum, and your run ins with Goldem Blunder were legendary, like the time you told him that a article you posted about us signing Stewart Downing was United Forum related because we were playing them next week, but it paid off in the end.

Because of you we now have the greatest squad in the history of the multiverse, ever. But at the same time I feel for you en. What are you going to do now? Heaven forbid you might actually stop playing FM and reading sites like transferumours.com and actually watch a full game of football. Wouldn't that be nice?
:lol::lol:
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
33,953
Location
Red man down in London town
There are many words to describe our squad now but I will go with 'Formidable'. In every area there is quality and talent that we have never seen before. This is without a doubt the best Manchester United squad ive ever seen.
 

Lot 49

Doom
Newbie
Joined
Jun 18, 2006
Messages
1,711
Been thinking about this at lunch and I think now with us signing Berbatov and Chelsea failing to replace Wright-Phillips with Robinho as they planned to we've definitely moved ahead of them and have the finest squad in the world.

Goal Keepers

VdS vs Cech
Kuszczak vs Cudicini
Foster vs Hilario

Chelsea edge us here with Cech being one of the best around and Cudicini being exactly what you need for cover, we have a better 3rd choice but that's not really important.

Defence

Evra/Vidic/Ferdinand/Brown
vs
Cole/Carvalho/Terry/Bosingwa

We have the best left back and the best central defensive partnership around. I rate Bosingwa higher than Brown personally but ours is the stronger unit overall.

Neville/O'Shea/Evans/Fabio+Rafael
Ferreira/Ivanovic/Alex/Bridge

Although we have huge amounts of raw talent there with Evans/Fabio/Rafael they have the experience which gives them the edge for me.

Central Midfield

Scholes/Carrick/Anderson/Hargreaves/Fletcher
vs
Lampard/Ballack/Deco/Essien/Mikel

Both have awesome variety and depth with virtually any combination. A draw.

Wingers/Wide Attackers

Ronaldo/Nani/Giggs/Park
vs
Cole/Kalou/Malouda/Belletti

Chelsea have made a mistake selling SWP and not replacing him imo, he's not great but they had to use Belletti on the right against Spurs and that's a step backwards for me. Anyway just the presence of Ronaldo means we win this battle, he's a monster of a player. J. Cole is the best of the Chelsea boys and he's not in the same league.

Forwards

Rooney/Tevez/Berbatov/Manucho
vs
Drogba/Anelka/Di Santo

This is hugely in our favour imo. Drogba is the wrong side of 30 and has had injury problems for about a year now and Anelka hasn't looked settled at Chelsea, I have a hard time seeing either player reproduce their peak form this year. We've got Rooney who, while not as good as he was for me, is still an immense player. Tevez who looks much fitter and sharper than last season and seems set to explode this year. Plus Berbatov who has been one of the best forwards in the league for the past two seasons and will excel playing with players as talented as ours. Manucho and Di Santo are both pretty unknown quantities and I'd be surprised if either of them had more than a minor role this year.

Overall then I think they are better off than us in terms of goal keepers and experienced cover for the defence but we have a better starting defence, better wide men and better forwards. I reckon title number 18 is ours for the taking.
 

bergen

Author of gayest thread 07/08
Joined
Oct 8, 2004
Messages
6,450
Location
Iceland
Lot_49, not giving Chelsea the midfield is a bit biased. Nothing against ours, but Essien is probably the best midfielder of his kind in the world right now, Deco is looking like a great buy, Ballack on his day is very hard to control and Lampard knows his stuff in the PL.

Until Anderson grows into the player we know he can become, and Hargreaves plays on a consistant basis, I think we have to give them that one. Carrick is IMO our best midfielder and Scholes, although still fantastic, is on the wrong side of 30 even more so than Drogba.
 

Kelvin

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
21,342
VDS - Foster - Kuszczak
Rafael - Brown - Neville - Rio - Vidic - Evans - Evra - Fabio - O'Shea
Scholes - Carrick - Hargreaves - Anderson - Fletcher - Possebon - Gibson
Ronaldo - Nani - Park - Giggs
Rooney - Berbatov - Tevez - Manucho - Welbeck
 

Plechazunga

Grammar partisan who sleeps with a real life Ryan
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
51,762
Location
Where Albert Stubbins scored a diving header
Centre midfield a draw? That's ridiculous. Their centre-mid's miles better. We've got excellent players, but they've got by far the best range of centre midfielders in the world.

Essien, Ballack, Deco, Lampard, Cole, Mikel...that's unbelievable

Defences are even: they've got the best goalie in the world. We've both got great centre-halves, ours slightly better. Evra's better than any of their full-backs, but Cole and Bosingwa are both better than Wesley and probably Gaz.

We've got miles better wingers - but then, they don't play with wingers - and miles better strikers. So I'd say we shade it, but not by much.
 

Merman

Guest
Centre midfield a draw? That's ridiculous. Their centre-mid's miles better. We've got excellent players, but they've got by far the best range of centre midfielders in the world.

Essien, Ballack, Deco, Lampard...that's unbelievable.

Defenses are even: they've got the best goalie in the world. We've both got great centre-halves, ours slightly better. Evra's better than any of their full-backs, but Cole and Bosingwa are both better than Wesley and probably Gaz.

We've got miles better wingers - but then, they don't play with wingers - and miles better strikers. So I'd say we shade it, but not by much.
I'd say their squad is slightly better, but we've got Fergie:devil:
 

kanchelskis14

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 1, 2004
Messages
13,370
Location
The slums of Hackney
Lot_49, not giving Chelsea the midfield is a bit biased. Nothing against ours, but Essien is probably the best midfielder of his kind in the world right now, Deco is looking like a great buy, Ballack on his day is very hard to control and Lampard knows his stuff in the PL.

Until Anderson grows into the player we know he can become, and Hargreaves plays on a consistant basis, I think we have to give them that one. Carrick is IMO our best midfielder and Scholes, although still fantastic, is on the wrong side of 30 even more so than Drogba.
Yea, was thinking similarly. I'd say their central midfield is better. The squads are very closely matched though, i'd say we just shade it.
 

bergen

Author of gayest thread 07/08
Joined
Oct 8, 2004
Messages
6,450
Location
Iceland
A quick look at our squad from a position overview. These are the players I think can realistically get games for us in major competitions (PL, CL, FA Cup) leaving out youngsters like Gray and Martin and Gibson that I don't think are close enough to our level of quality (at least yet).

Goal: VDS PIG Foster
Left Back: Evra Fabio, O'Shea
Right Back: Brown Neville Rafael
Centreback: Rio Vidic Evans
Left Midfield: Giggs Nani
Right Midfield: Ronaldo Park
Centre Mid: Scholes Carrick Anderson Hargreaves Fletcher Possebon
Strikers: Rooney Tevez Berbatov Manucho Welbeck

So we have at least a main player and a specialized backup player in every position. In central midfield , full back and (surprisingly) the striker department we have more than one straight replacement.
Looking at this, I'd say the squad is very balanced, despite a fair few players getting shipped out (Silvestre, Saha, Campbell, et cetera)

Add to that utility players like Brown (also a centreback), Hargreaves (a very solid right back), O'Shea (right back, midfield, goal) and the striker capabilities of Ronaldo and to a lesser extent Nani, we should have answers for most situations that arise.

Fantasmo!
 

Lot 49

Doom
Newbie
Joined
Jun 18, 2006
Messages
1,711
My thinking on the centre midfielders was that:

Essien is amazing and better than anyone we have right now and in the conceivable future. Even though Chelsea tend to waste him slightly as a defensive midfielder he is still far better than Hargreaves.

Scholes is marginally better than Deco.

Lampard and Ballack are 30+ and are declining, Lampard wasn't quite as good as he normally is last season and Ballack has never been as good as in the premiership as he was in Germany. In contrast Carrick was our best midfielder last season and Anderson should kick on another gear as well, I reckon our two players will show themselves to be better than the two Chelsea players this year.

Mikel is a better player than Fletcher but neither will play that regularly so it's not that important.
 

kanchelskis14

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 1, 2004
Messages
13,370
Location
The slums of Hackney
My thinking on the centre midfielders was that:

Essien is amazing and better than anyone we have right now and in the conceivable future. Even though Chelsea tend to waste him slightly as a defensive midfielder he is still far better than Hargreaves.

Scholes is marginally better than Deco.

Lampard and Ballack are 30+ and are declining, Lampard wasn't quite as good as he normally is last season and Ballack has never been as good as in the premiership as he was in Germany. In contrast Carrick was our best midfielder last season and Anderson should kick on another gear as well, I reckon our two players will show themselves to be better than the two Chelsea players this year.

Mikel is a better player than Fletcher but neither will play that regularly so it's not that important.
Scholes isn't better than Deco, at least not now. I know i'll get the usual bollocking for that statement, but truthfully, why is he better?
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
52,809
Location
Founder of IhateMakeleles.org and Gourcufffanboysa
Centre midfield a draw? That's ridiculous. Their centre-mid's miles better. We've got excellent players, but they've got by far the best range of centre midfielders in the world.

Essien, Ballack, Deco, Lampard, Cole, Mikel...that's unbelievable

Defences are even: they've got the best goalie in the world. We've both got great centre-halves, ours slightly better. Evra's better than any of their full-backs, but Cole and Bosingwa are both better than Wesley and probably Gaz.

We've got miles better wingers - but then, they don't play with wingers - and miles better strikers. So I'd say we shade it, but not by much.
Agreed
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,852
Scholes isn't better than Deco, at least not now. I know i'll get the usual bollocking for that statement, but truthfully, why is he better?
He's proven a vital part of this team, is well settled in, and knows our playing style perfectly. Deco is yet to settle in yet, and even though he got off to a good start he will need to familiarize himself with the team a lot more before becoming as important to Chelsea as Scholes is to Manchester United.
 

Ole_Gunnar

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
9,428
Location
"You spilled my coffee..."
My thinking on the centre midfielders was that:

Essien is amazing and better than anyone we have right now and in the conceivable future. Even though Chelsea tend to waste him slightly as a defensive midfielder he is still far better than Hargreaves.

Scholes is marginally better than Deco.

Lampard and Ballack are 30+ and are declining, Lampard wasn't quite as good as he normally is last season and Ballack has never been as good as in the premiership as he was in Germany. In contrast Carrick was our best midfielder last season and Anderson should kick on another gear as well, I reckon our two players will show themselves to be better than the two Chelsea players this year.

Mikel is a better player than Fletcher but neither will play that regularly so it's not that important.
Essien isn't better than Paul Scholes...
 

Lot 49

Doom
Newbie
Joined
Jun 18, 2006
Messages
1,711
Scholes isn't better than Deco, at least not now. I know i'll get the usual bollocking for that statement, but truthfully, why is he better?
He is far better in general defensive terms which allows him to play in a successful 4-4-2 team which Deco hasn't been capable of doing in years (if he ever was, I've only followed him since his Porto days). I would also say his reading of the game is better and he's a better long passer.

Deco is certainly an excellent player and has better technical ability than Scholes and can actually dribble/run with the ball a bit but overall I think Scholes is better, although only marginally as I said.

Deco is also better at diving.
 

kanchelskis14

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 1, 2004
Messages
13,370
Location
The slums of Hackney
He's proven a vital part of this team, is well settled in, and knows our playing style perfectly. Deco is yet to settle in yet, and even though he got off to a good start he will need to familiarize himself with the team a lot more before becoming as important to Chelsea as Scholes is to Manchester United.
That's not really a fair argument though. I know it is an extreme, but had Chelsea signed Messi, we could safely say he was better than all of our wingers, perhaps bar Ronaldo.

The fact is, Deco is not an unknown quantity, and can be compared to Scholes in the same way Pirlo can, they don't need to play in the same league for a number of years. Otherwise Scholes simply wins by default, and generally, whichever team buys the most new players is the weaker of the two then?
 

kanchelskis14

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 1, 2004
Messages
13,370
Location
The slums of Hackney
He is far better in general defensive terms which allows him to play in a successful 4-4-2 team which Deco hasn't been capable of doing in years (if he ever was, I've only followed him since his Porto days). I would also say his reading of the game is better and he's a better long passer.

Deco is certainly an excellent player and has better technical ability than Scholes and can actually dribble/run with the ball a bit but overall I think Scholes is better, although only marginally as I said.

Deco is also better at diving.
What if his team doesn't want to play 4-4-2? You can't call Scholes better because he is better defensively in a 4-4-2, there is more than one way to play the game.
 

Lot 49

Doom
Newbie
Joined
Jun 18, 2006
Messages
1,711
What if his team doesn't want to play 4-4-2? You can't call Scholes better because he is better defensively in a 4-4-2, there is more than one way to play the game.
The 4-4-2 was just an example. It's the whole being far better defensively that I was using to explain why I think he's a better player.
 

Blair

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
4,599
Location
Republic of Mancunia
Some of you lot need to quit the bias FFS!

Chelsea's midfield group are better than anyone else's - by a mile.

But our defensive unit and attacking players make our squad superior imo.
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,194
Location
Interweb
Centre midfield a draw? That's ridiculous. Their centre-mid's miles better. We've got excellent players, but they've got by far the best range of centre midfielders in the world.

Essien, Ballack, Deco, Lampard, Cole, Mikel...that's unbelievable

Defences are even: they've got the best goalie in the world. We've both got great centre-halves, ours slightly better. Evra's better than any of their full-backs, but Cole and Bosingwa are both better than Wesley and probably Gaz.

We've got miles better wingers - but then, they don't play with wingers - and miles better strikers. So I'd say we shade it, but not by much.
That would be my analysis as well. Though I think they are missing a proper winger in their squad. Someone who can take on players and dribble past 3-4 players. Someone like Robinhio. :)

Also if Drogba can't stay fit, it will hurt them big time. Anelka is not really that good.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,852
That's not really a fair argument though. I know it is an extreme, but had Chelsea signed Messi, we could safely say he was better than all of our wingers, perhaps bar Ronaldo.

The fact is, Deco is not an unknown quantity, and can be compared to Scholes in the same way Pirlo can, they don't need to play in the same league for a number of years. Otherwise Scholes simply wins by default, and generally, whichever team buys the most new players is the weaker of the two then?
Fine. In terms of ability, Scholes still edges it. Actually, he's just plainly a better player, he doesn't edge anything.

It seems at times you try to be overly objective to the state where you look down upon United players when comparing them with others, obviously not intentionally.

The fact is Deco will take a while to dully adapt, and so that gives Scholes an advantage for this season.
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,194
Location
Interweb
Essien isn't better than Paul Scholes...
Different type of players. But if we separate Scholes the United legend from the player, I would swap him Essien for sure.

And there is not much between Deco and Scholes either and I say that when Scholes is my current fav player and Deco one of the most hated. Infact given Deco still have legs to get in the box, he probably edges it. There is still a chance Deco will bottle it in the winters, so let's wait and see.
 

Ole_Gunnar

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
9,428
Location
"You spilled my coffee..."
Different type of players. But if we separate Scholes the United legend from the player, I would swap him Essien for sure.

And there is not much between Deco and Scholes either and I say that when Scholes is my current fav player and Deco one of the most hated. Infact given Deco still have legs to get in the box, he probably edges it. There is still a chance Deco will bottle it in the winters, so let's wait and see.
Did you see some of Scholes passes last friday? That's something Essien could never do. Scholes is a footballers' footballer.
 

KingEric7

Stupid Conspiracy Enthusiast Wanker
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
24,005
Essien isn't better than Paul Scholes...
Technically, Scholes is something else. I'd go as far as to say that his ball retention and passing is unmatched anywhere else in England.

But let's be honest...we're talking about Michael Essien. His skill level doesn't match that of a Bergkamp or a Scholes, but he's pretty much Roy Keane all over again.

If Berbatov is worth £30m, then the money needed to get this guy could be used to buy an island.
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,194
Location
Interweb
Did you see some of Scholes passes last friday? That's something Essien could never do. Scholes is a footballers' footballer.
Keane could never pass like that as well. I still rank him above Scholes as would most people.
 

Ole_Gunnar

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
9,428
Location
"You spilled my coffee..."
Technically, Scholes is something else. I'd go as far as to say that his ball retention and passing is unmatched anywhere else in England.

But let's be honest...we're talking about Michael Essien. His skill level doesn't match that of a Bergkamp or a Scholes, but he's pretty much Roy Keane all over again.

If Berbatov is worth £30m, then the money needed to get this guy could be used to buy an island.
He's such a dominant CM, that he was played right back last season.