Would you sack or keep Ole? (Poll reopened)

Sack or Keep OLE?

  • Sack Ole & appoint new coach ASAP

  • Keep Ole & back him to finish rebuild


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tom Van Persie

No relation
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
24,541
I'd say keep.

Reasoning.

We haven't had stability for a LONG time.

Context:
Moyes / LVG / Jose

All wasted millions on average players and did not overhaul the squad. This leaves Ole with 4 MANAGERS worth of players who have declined, have no motivation to be a success here and are basically stealing a living.

What Ole has shown already in ONE transfer window is the ability to identify players whom he believes are young/hungry and can improve. The first transfer window where there is a clear transfer strategy since Fergie's days. What Ole has also done in this window is be ruthless, something previous managers could not.

Are we currently in poor form? Yes
Would we be in current poor form with the same squad? Yes

We are in transition. You don't win with style in transition.

Ole is re-building. Re-building takes time / effort / dedication. If we are going to sack Ole so soon, what was the point? Why sack Moyes? Why Sack LVG? Why Sack Jose?

The way this club is run is the major issue. But unless we stay patient. We'll sack ole, hire new guy - repeat every season.

It will get better. everyone calm down
:lol:

We'll be fighting relegation if Ole stays but at least we have 'stability' :houllier:
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,390
ANOTHER QUESTION FOR PEOPLE VOTING "SACK"

If we get Pogba, AWB, Martial & Shaw back and we put in an amazing performance v Liverpool and beat them 3-0...

Would you change your vote to "KEEP"?
Of course many would. Probably the same ones you can dig up posts saying give him the job 7 months ago.
 

Rafaeldagold

New Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
2,036
Why hasn’t he gone yet? We’re going to dither & dither & then fcking dither some more before the inevitable.

it’s actually amazing how the Glazers & Woody & Ole have managed to fck up such an amazing & historic club like ours
 

waza7111

Full Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Messages
1,107
If we were comfortably in the top 6, I would say keep him. But there is a genuine possibility of us being relegated the longer he stays. I presume that he will be sacked around Christmas when we are still in the bottom half of the table. I can't see him turning it around.
 

Bobcat

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
6,388
Location
Behind the curtains, leering at the neighbors
Nit really. Jose won cups and 2nd. So it's clearly different manager yields different result and there's possibility of new manager being better or worse.
No i meant in regards to poor player mentality and perceived lack of effort. No doubt Jose burned too many bridges and after his meltdown he had to go, but was it all down to his quarrel with Ed and because he did not get a CB?

Not going to single out any players, as there have been numerous threads discussing them, but imo there are a fair few in our squad that i would not exactly call strong characters
 

djembatheking

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Messages
4,050
Ole is different to all the other managers since SAF as we all know that he genuinely cares and it must hurt him as much as anyone to be in this position .
The biggest action/statement he could make would be to resign and come out with a statement saying he loves the club and wants to help but it is an impossible task because of the way the owners and Woodward are running the club .
In the long run it is probably the best thing he could do for the good of Manchester United as a football club .
 

fergiesarmy1

New Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
3,595
Ole is different to all the other managers since SAF as we all know that he genuinely cares and it must hurt him as much as anyone to be in this position .
The biggest action/statement he could make would be to resign and come out with a statement saying he loves the club and wants to help but it is an impossible task because of the way the owners and Woodward are running the club .
In the long run it is probably the best thing he could do for the good of Manchester United as a football club .
Fergie liked his money also, no one in their right mind walks away from millions he can expect if he does end up getting the elbow.
 

Untied

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
4,480
where do people get this stuff from. I read so much revisionism and just plain made up stuff on here these days, especially with this obsession of comparing Poch now and Klopp's final season at Dortmund

He left Dortmund in a fine state, a club in financial mess when he arrived with a mediocre squad was now on an even footing, with a good squad of players, without many tweaks needed (not his fault Tuchel then went on to fall out with a load of players), and a club who'd qualified for Europe 6 years running. The only downside was not being in CL that year - but we where still in Europe, and in the end it didn't set the club back, at all.

So anyway, carry on, just these odd comments man!
It was their worst league finish for 7 years. Tottenham are similarly in a much better state now than when Poch took over.
 

djembatheking

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Messages
4,050
Fergie liked his money also, no one in their right mind walks away from millions he can expect if he does end up getting the elbow.
Exactly why it would be a massive statement . You are right , it probably won`t happen because of the money but he is in a position to make a huge statement .
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
My eyes are open.

Its the narrow minded fans with only short term logic that's the issue.

Hire Poch - watch him spend 200mil then fail, then Hire allegri - repeat. We have become masters in wasting money and hiring the wrong managers only thinking short term.

Why don't you open your eyes?

The way the club is run is the issue, not Ole. Ole is changing the squad, changing the background staff, all under Ed Woodward (who no utd manager has succeeded under).
You’re talking about things you hope would happen if Ole was sacked. Funny they are all negative but we should support the club like you.
 

reddev3

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 9, 2018
Messages
450
It maybe not a new trend but it’s never been this bad under Moyes, LVG or Mourinho.

Tbh we haven’t appointed a progressive, modern, forward thinking coach at his peak since saf retired. Moyes is Moyes a dinosaur, LVG was finished at club level, Mourinho was finished at the highest level and ole is just not a very good manager.

The 3 before ole have gone on to have magnificent spells at other clubs since leaving United right? NO!!! they haven’t they can’t even get a job, which shows how poor these managers are.

We need someone new, someone with fresh ideas, attacking style of play. There are managers out there it’s the boards job to find the right person.

We can bitch and moan about the glazers all day long the fact is they aren’t going anywhere anytime soon, so the best thing for us is to try and get the best most suitable manager possible. Which let’s be honest is not ole in a million years

Bloody hell that's good point, all three past managers are unemployed!

Marco Rose could be perfect and seeing as though Gladbach aren't in he champions league we could probably get him now if we paid the fee's.
 

edcunited1878

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
8,935
Location
San Diego, CA
Bloody hell that's good point, all three past managers are unemployed!

Marco Rose could be perfect and seeing as though Gladbach aren't in he champions league we could probably get him now if we paid the fee's.
Moyes thinks he's above any managerial position he's been offered, assuming he's been offered something. LVG knew United was his managerial job and was content with that. Mourinho has turned down offers and is waiting for something he thinks is what he wants/deserves (i.e. Madrid).
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
I'm still surprised he can't even muster a single false dawn result here or there to buy time. How is he even worse than the version of Jose who was trying to get sacked on purpose? That's a feat. He was playing Mctominay in defense to lose games. The players and managers downed tools and still weren't this bad.
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
3,094
Location
Salford
It may come as a surprise but a manager is also a leader who sets direction.
Of course the manager is partly responsible, but I genuinely think the majority of the blame is on the board. The Glazers don't care and Woodward has no clue. They are leaving United to stagnate; there is no vision. Ole has been hung out to dry.
 

Roboc7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
6,661
The blame should be directed to both - the board and Ole. Both are responsible for this mess and the next manager has to fix Ole's mess that he did over the last 9 months.
Whoever comes in has to sort out over six years of Ed’s mess and all the future mess he is going to create. Not much point blaming Ole, long after he’s gone Ed will still be around.
 

reddev3

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 9, 2018
Messages
450
Moyes thinks he's above any managerial position he's been offered, assuming he's been offered something. LVG knew United was his managerial job and was content with that. Mourinho has turned down offers and is waiting for something he thinks is what he wants/deserves (i.e. Madrid).
So only rubbish clubs are offering Moyes and Mourinhio jobs which proves my point. LVG has also openly said he would mange again if the right club came in so it's probably rubbish clubs offering him jobs as well.

The fact is top clubs don't want these three managers as they aren't the top managers in todays game. Mourinho might get one but he definitely isn't hot property like he once was.
 

MisterLupus

New Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
505
Location
Bollocking about fluently.
Funny how it works for literally every other successful club.
Well that's what we've done and it hasn't worked. Four managers in six years hasn't seen us win anything of significance - in fact it's seen us to our worst state in thirty years. And no Ole didn't create our current predicament - he inherited it. We're exactly where we were when he came in. Better in defense - but it doesn't help because we're absolutely toothless in attack.
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
3,094
Location
Salford
Whoever comes in has to sort out over six years of Ed’s mess and all the future mess he is going to create. Not much point blaming Ole, long after he’s gone Ed will still be around.
I fully agree. Woodward is being paid top dollar for continuous failure. It's incredible he is still in his post. We need change throughout the club; if Ole doesn't turn this around very soon, he will be sacked, but the fundamental problems will remain.
 

Florida Man

Cartoon expert and crap superhero
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
13,911
Location
Florida, man
Of course the manager is partly responsible, but I genuinely think the majority of the blame is on the board. The Glazers don't care and Woodward has no clue. They are leaving United to stagnate; there is no vision. Ole has been hung out to dry.
Woodward and the Glazers have their hand in this and are terrible and couldn’t be gone sooner. I will always agree with that. However, they are not responsible for how we actually play football. They’re not on the training pitches. They’re not designing tactics. They’re not man managing during matches. They’re not the ones responsible for no one running into the box when a wide player is trying to attack the goal. Etc etc. From 2005 through 2013, the Glazers owned us and have been awful in spending the money to the point they had SAF bullshit us about no value in the market. Yet the man could still transform players and win trophies. Yes, SAF was one of a kind, but that goes to show you how a great manager can operate even under the boot of shitty owners.
 

Florida Man

Cartoon expert and crap superhero
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
13,911
Location
Florida, man
Well that's what we've done and it hasn't worked. Four managers in six years hasn't seen us win anything of significance - in fact it's seen us to our worst state in thirty years. And no Ole didn't create our current predicament - he inherited it. We're exactly where we were when he came in. Better in defense - but it doesn't help because we're absolutely toothless in attack.
4 managers in 6 years and it should continue until we get the right one. Look how many managers Chelsea and Liverpool went through in 6 years. Once they realized the manager was shit, they moved onto the next guy. That’s how Liverpool ended up with Klopp instead of persisting with someone like Dalglish. Do you think they care they had to go on a merry go round to get where they’re at now? Jury is still out on Chelsea but it’s looking like Lampard is getting his team playing cohesively.
 

Roboc7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
6,661
I fully agree. Woodward is being paid top dollar for continuous failure. It's incredible he is still in his post. We need change throughout the club; if Ole doesn't turn this around very soon, he will be sacked, but the fundamental problems will remain.
Yes Ole will be sacked and deservedly so based on his tactics etc. But Ed will be one having to try and find a replacement which is something he doesn’t know how to do. Ole bailed him out, have always wondered if Ole had done badly as caretaker who would Ed have got?. Not convinced he got anywhere near an alternative.

Post SAF there have been three key points where you would expect a competent business to sort everything out or change how they operate. Firstly when SAF retired, secondly when Moyes went and they had time to correct their initial mistake and restructure. Finally when Jose went, they had time and even said all right things about a DOF and finding next manager in their initial statement.

Everytime Woodward and whoever else have just repeated same mistake, it wouldn’t be tolerated in any business yet at Utd no one bats an eyelid. None of it really makes any sense.
 

fergiesarmy1

New Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
3,595
A source has told the mail he’s all good still apparently, same source all pointed out he we are missing a few players.

Sounds like they just made it up, what’s the need to point out we are missing players that much is pretty obvious.
 

TheRedDevil'sAdvocate

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
3,664
Location
The rainbow's end
For what it's worth, i believe that the stars are aligning for us and Poch to join our fates next summer. Maybe we'll get Eriksen as a bonus for the cursed #10 position too, who knows? A club that spends so much money on wages only to get very poor results and a manager who seems to believe that he deserves to take the step forward and work with a bigger budget.

Hopefully, he'll prove to be Woodward's get out of jail card because our dear Ed isn't going anywhere soon since he's the Glazers' most favourite employee.

As long as Zidane is doing well in the league, i can see this happening next summer.
 

edcunited1878

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
8,935
Location
San Diego, CA
So only rubbish clubs are offering Moyes and Mourinhio jobs which proves my point. LVG has also openly said he would mange again if the right club came in so it's probably rubbish clubs offering him jobs as well.

The fact is top clubs don't want these three managers as they aren't the top managers in todays game. Mourinho might get one but he definitely isn't hot property like he once was.
Moyes was never a top manager. Mourinho is a top manager and will always be one, however his pragmatism isn't a great fit for every club. For example, if Spurs had the current squad with Jose as manager, they'd have won something by now because Spurs have quality players. United never had enough quality players across the pitch for Mourinho to challenge.
 

edcunited1878

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
8,935
Location
San Diego, CA
For what it's worth, i believe that the stars are aligning for us and Poch to join our fates next summer. Maybe we'll get Eriksen as a bonus for the cursed #10 position too, who knows? A club that spends so much money on wages only to get very poor results and a manager who seems to believe that he deserves to take the step forward and work with a bigger budget.

Hopefully, he'll prove to be Woodward's get out of jail card because our dear Ed isn't going anywhere soon since he's the Glazers' most favourite employee.

As long as Zidane is doing well in the league, i can see this happening next summer.
Poch would be going to a team with worse overall quality though. Woodward and United could ruin any good Poch did in the PL. Poch isn't as involved with transfer ins and outs as everyone thinks he is, same as Ole.
 

bonothom

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
843
Not replacing Fellaini, Herrera, Lukaku and Sanchez was a terrible decision from Ole. Deserves the sack for that decision alone.
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
3,094
Location
Salford
Woodward and the Glazers have their hand in this and are terrible and couldn’t be gone sooner. I will always agree with that. However, they are not responsible for how we actually play football. They’re not on the training pitches. They’re not designing tactics. They’re not man managing during matches. They’re not the ones responsible for no one running into the box when a wide player is trying to attack the goal. Etc etc. From 2005 through 2013, the Glazers owned us and have been awful in spending the money to the point they had SAF bullshit us about no value in the market. Yet the man could still transform players and win trophies. Yes, SAF was one of a kind, but that goes to show you how a great manager can operate even under the boot of shitty owners.
You are absolutely right, Ole must also play his part, and at the moment he is failing. Given the context of the situation - shambolic club and poor squad - I prefer to give him a bit of time, but he knows he is on thin ice. If things don't improve very soon, he will be out.
 

Baneofthegame

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2019
Messages
3,010
Yes Ole will be sacked and deservedly so based on his tactics etc. But Ed will be one having to try and find a replacement which is something he doesn’t know how to do. Ole bailed him out, have always wondered if Ole had done badly as caretaker who would Ed have got?. Not convinced he got anywhere near an alternative.

Post SAF there have been three key points where you would expect a competent business to sort everything out or change how they operate. Firstly when SAF retired, secondly when Moyes went and they had time to correct their initial mistake and restructure. Finally when Jose went, they had time and even said all right things about a DOF and finding next manager in their initial statement.

Everytime Woodward and whoever else have just repeated same mistake, it wouldn’t be tolerated in any business yet at Utd no one bats an eyelid. None of it really makes any sense.
When he’ll freezes over we will appoint a DoF it seems, it baffles me why we didn’t buy the players in the summer because it’s going to be even harder and more expensive in January when teams know we are desperate.
 

Rista

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,316
I'd say keep.

Reasoning.

We haven't had stability for a LONG time.

Context:
Moyes / LVG / Jose

All wasted millions on average players and did not overhaul the squad. This leaves Ole with 4 MANAGERS worth of players who have declined, have no motivation to be a success here and are basically stealing a living.

What Ole has shown already in ONE transfer window is the ability to identify players whom he believes are young/hungry and can improve. The first transfer window where there is a clear transfer strategy since Fergie's days. What Ole has also done in this window is be ruthless, something previous managers could not.

Are we currently in poor form? Yes
Would we be in current poor form with the same squad? Yes

We are in transition. You don't win with style in transition.

Ole is re-building. Re-building takes time / effort / dedication. If we are going to sack Ole so soon, what was the point? Why sack Moyes? Why Sack LVG? Why Sack Jose?

The way this club is run is the major issue. But unless we stay patient. We'll sack ole, hire new guy - repeat every season.

It will get better. everyone calm down
:lol:

So even if we sacrifice everything for "stability", why would we give this monumental rebuild job to a person who has never managed at this level before? What if he IS way out of his depth, as his CV would suggest. Wouldn't trusting him with this job be utter madness?

We will very likely never have the stability that we had with SAF, people need to accept that.
 

Kemizee

New Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
649
Location
Lagos, Nigeria
I'd say keep.

Reasoning.

We haven't had stability for a LONG time.

Context:
Moyes / LVG / Jose

All wasted millions on average players and did not overhaul the squad. This leaves Ole with 4 MANAGERS worth of players who have declined, have no motivation to be a success here and are basically stealing a living.

What Ole has shown already in ONE transfer window is the ability to identify players whom he believes are young/hungry and can improve. The first transfer window where there is a clear transfer strategy since Fergie's days. What Ole has also done in this window is be ruthless, something previous managers could not.

Are we currently in poor form? Yes
Would we be in current poor form with the same squad? Yes

We are in transition. You don't win with style in transition.

Ole is re-building. Re-building takes time / effort / dedication. If we are going to sack Ole so soon, what was the point? Why sack Moyes? Why Sack LVG? Why Sack Jose?

The way this club is run is the major issue. But unless we stay patient. We'll sack ole, hire new guy - repeat every season.

It will get better. everyone calm down
We are heading towards relegation and you talk of stability? Are we watching the same games?

He didn't identify jack. One was recommended by Giggs, the other two were names basically everyone on the cafe said we should sign to shore up our defence and can we please stop this 'young and hungry' nonsense? A player is either a quality player or not. Other top clubs sign players and go about their businesses without making a mantra out of it.

Why must Ole in particular be in charge of rebuilding a club as big as ours? Is it based on his history of being a successful manager/rebuild organizer or just blind faith? Can't any other manager apart from the former manager of Molde(a club I knew nothing abt BTW were it not for links to Ole.) be in charge of a club as big as Manchester United?

You can talk about give him time all you want but I wonder if time makes one to become tactically sound or a better manager.
 

Zed 101

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
1,453
Those defending him based on lack of signings, how do you explain Ole saying he was happy with the squad?

The ones who are saying there's no one to replace him, do you want him to continue until it's too late to turn around?

Spurs are in bad form but the gulf in class between Poch and Ole is huge. If Poch is available we need to go for him. He's shown he can work with limited squads and spending. Spurs form at the moment is the exception not the rule, whereas the opposite applies to Ole.

The guy is so far out of his depth its unreal. Love the player but he is not the man to take us forward.
I would agree that if Poch was available it would be prudent to swap over, but in defense of Ole he has to come out and make positive noises the last manager was hung out to dry because he publicly denounced the team and the club. Besides Ole has said that it is a project not a quick fix, he openly said we were looking for more players but this turned to happy with the squad when the deadline came around, you cannot expect him to come out and lambast Woodward for being the feckwitt that he obviously is, or to say this squad is well below standard, we are going to be lucky to finish top half even if that is what he believes.
 

TheRedDevil'sAdvocate

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
3,664
Location
The rainbow's end
Poch would be going to a team with worse overall quality though. Woodward and United could ruin any good Poch did in the PL. Poch isn't as involved with transfer ins and outs as everyone thinks he is, same as Ole.
I think he will be granted a better transfer kitty than Solskjaer by Woodward. More proven in the PL and we'll probably be at the end of a tragic season and there will be more panic than usual. Both LvG and Mourinho were given more funds than Moyes and Solskjaer, maybe because Ed was less hesitant to trust them (LvG spent equally to City after his 4th spot and Mourinho was afforded his four specialists right from the get-go). Plus, unless something miraculous on the pitch or a major global catastrophe occurs, come next May there will be no burying our heads in the sand anymore and no grand illusions regarding the state of the squad. The new manager will demand players, the fans will be fully on his side and Woodward will have to act.
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
28,983
Location
Croatia
We are heading towards relegation and you talk of stability? Are we watching the same games?

He didn't identify jack. One was recommended by Giggs, the other two were names basically everyone on the cafe said we should sign to shore up our defence and can we please stop this 'young and hungry' nonsense? A player is either a quality player or not. Other top clubs sign players and go about their businesses without making a mantra out of it.

Why must Ole in particular be in charge of rebuilding a club as big as ours? Is it based on his history of being a successful manager/rebuild organizer or just blind faith? Can't any other manager apart from the former manager of Molde(a club I knew nothing abt BTW were it not for links to Ole.) be in charge of a club as big as Manchester United?

You can talk about give him time all you want but I wonder if time makes one to become tactically sound or a better manager.
I loved that bolded part. This year we went in full emotional mode as a club. Players who really really really want to be here? Give me a fecking break. Players from Brasil play in fecking Shakhtar or CSKA and "dying" from cold weather. Do they want to be there? No, they would rather play in Spain i guess but they are payed for playing football. Player is payed to play football. Period.
Since we hired Ole there are all these emotions and cliches about love, identity, Fergie's parking spot etc...we must stop with that nonsense.
Fans are part of football who can be and must be emotional. Club hierarchy must run club based on common sense
 

Nialler

Alex's Dad
Joined
Aug 19, 2003
Messages
10,439
Location
Nyler
Mourinho stated that there were serious issues unresolved behind the scenes, does anyone know more and care to elaborate? Personally I don't think we have hit rock bottom yet but we are heading there unless something changes. We either persevere with the current state of affairs and hope the players discover their fighting spirit or put the plug in and try to root out whatever it is that has caused this mess. I think something needs to change before it gets worse, if we lose another couple of games and end up in the relegation zone the media pressure will be totally unbearable even if you think its unbearable now. Can Ole steer us into clearer waters or has he lost the dressing room? I would suggest, as has already been stated here, that the biggest problem is the Glazers and their stool pigeon Woodward because we have already sacked three managers in five years and things have gradually worsened, yet Woodward , who was promoted to his current role in 2013, appears to be untouchable which is probably due to the fact that he was instrumental in the Glazers' takeover as owners back in 2005. Remember, the Glazer's took control of our club without dipping any of their own cash in a leveraged buyout and now they are reaping the financial rewards. They basically minimised the financial risk of the takeover backfiring with the help of Woodward the banker who structured the deal for them and now the team are mimicking this on the pitch by playing risk-free football. Its all starting to make sense. :(
 

Trondivan

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 1, 2014
Messages
177
Location
Bodø
Im a little bit torned about this. Been following for 35 years - and this is rough.

We all can agree that the results are bad, the style of play is crap (If there is a style...) the squad is to thin, the Glazers are shit and Ed is clueless...

I also worry about lack of leadership on and off the pitch, regarding both Ole and the players. They all appear lost and deluded.

If Ole has lost the dressing room he has to go. And sadly so becouse i had such high hopes.

But, If he is backed by the board and the players and they still believe in him and his plans; keep him for now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.