That first pen for Portugal tonight

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,533
Because people can just launch their head towards a keepers fist and draw an easy penalty. When you go for the ball, you take a risk.
But that's the same with a slide tackle? If the keeper misses and hits the player it's a foul?

I'm confused, are you saying it should not have been a penalty?
 

antk

Full Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2021
Messages
810
Because people can just launch their head towards a keepers fist and draw an easy penalty. When you go for the ball, you take a risk.
Basic self-preservation instincts make people not do that.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
44,158
But that's the same with a slide tackle? If the keeper misses and hits the player it's a foul?

I'm confused, are you saying it should not have been a penalty?
No because he didn't get the ball first. I'm saying I have no problem with keepers laying out people but they have to actually win the ball.
 

Hughes35

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2014
Messages
2,614
Easily a penalty...... The France pen on the other hand :nono: What an awful decision that was.
 

giorno

boob novice
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
26,820
Supports
Real Madrid
No because he didn't get the ball first. I'm saying I have no problem with keepers laying out people but they have to actually win the ball.
This is how it works right now. This was a penalty because Danilo got the ball first
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
A quick question to those who think it was a penalty - if a defender clashes heads in the box going for a ball like that, is that a penalty?

Lloris gets a bit of the ball and also gets the player with a ball playing part of his body - no difference from a clash of heads which almost never results in a penalty.
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,370
Location
Blitztown
This is how it works right now. This was a penalty because Danilo got the ball first
It’s how it’s always worked. Mistimed a tackle (albeit with his hands) and smacked an opponent in the head. Yes he’s only fractionally late, hence no red card. But it’s the clearest penalty of the tournament.

Note : I’m not quarreling with you, just adding to your point.
 

Schmeichel's Cartwheel

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Messages
11,420
Location
Manchester
He punched him in the head. The fact some people thought it wasn’t a pen highlights how much protection keepers have had over the years.

“he went for the ball” so did every player in the history of football making a slide tackle. If you miss the ball & take the man it’s a foul, wether it’s your foot or your fist.
 

Dominos

Full Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
7,012
Location
Manchester
The player headed the ball into him
Then that's surely the equivalent of a close-range block that defenders make every game?

I can see the argument both ways. I really don't want to see keepers getting sent off for trying to clear a cross though..
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,324
I’m even more confused.
Keepers are mostly over protected when it comes to aerial challenges for the ball in the box in games.

But you come into that area you might get smashed either way, it's the risk you take. But to most keepers that's never a penalty. It's a 50/50 ball he has to go for, he's just a fraction of a second late.

As a keeper I see that as no different, less dangerous and less painful than a clash of heads as it's not skull on skull.

Are we going to start seeing penalties when people clash heads now?
 

arnie_ni

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
15,230
Then that's surely the equivalent of a close-range block that defenders make every game?

I can see the argument both ways. I really don't want to see keepers getting sent off for trying to clear a cross though..
And if a defender gets the ball and absolutely KOs an attacker pens stillbget given. Touching the ball doesn't equate to no foul.
 

huyn

Full Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
754
Supports
FC Nantes
It waw definitely a pen, and it could/should have been a red card for Lloris. Our pen was not a pen, one of the softest ones I've ever seen. Ref was all over the place in the first half, he was horrendous, he did much better in the 2nd even though he missed that Bruno foul at the end which was a pen or at least a free kick depending on how you look at it.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,188
Location
Manchester
Keepers are mostly over protected when it comes to aerial challenges for the ball in the box in games.

But you come into that area you might get smashed either way, it's the risk you take. But to most keepers that's never a penalty. It's a 50/50 ball he has to go for, he's just a fraction of a second late.

As a keeper I see that as no different, less dangerous and less painful than a clash of heads as it's not skull on skull.

Are we going to start seeing penalties when people clash heads now?
I mean I disagree but fine I’m not that bothered, my initial question was what the feck is a “free out”?
 

Gonçalo Motta

Full Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
627
Location
Porto, Portugal
None of the penalties last night in the game were penalties.

The Lloris descision was awful, never a penalty.
Wait.. what? First penalty Lloris punched Danilo into oblivion after Danilo already headed the ball. Clear fault and a clear penalty.
The second penalty for Portugal was a clear handball as well. If neither was a penalty then nothing is.

Mbappe dive for the french penalty was shameful though. He tried to pull the same stunt twice later but he realized that the player behind him was Benzema so it was pointless
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
Wait.. what? First penalty Lloris punched Danilo into oblivion after Danilo already headed the ball. Clear fault and a clear penalty.
The second penalty for Portugal was a clear handball as well. If neither was a penalty then nothing is.

Mbappe dive for the french penalty was shameful though. He tried to pull the same stunt twice later but he realized that the player behind him was Benzema so it was pointless
I will agree to disagree with you on all counts bar the Mbappe incident!

For me Lloris gets a fist on the ball, which happens before the contact with Danilo, the handball is not clear, he is a yard away and looking in the opposite direction! Poor decision in my eyes.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,699
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
It was a fantastic Shoryuken. No idea if it's a pen, but it looked amazing.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,324
You’ve just made that up!
Yeah, all by myself just this morning. I think it'll catch on eventually.

Definitely haven't heard it used before in any game I've ever played or watched for the last 20 or 30 odd years.
 

Handré1990

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
4,819
Location
In hibernation
More pertinent question is - did this warrant a new thread?
Well, I didn’t think so, but when so many saw it different, I wanted to know their thinking. Also should be connected to a larger theme about how keepers seem to get a free pass for almost everything. You have my permisjon to feck off if you don’t like it:)
 

Gonçalo Motta

Full Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
627
Location
Porto, Portugal

Nick7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
19,328
Location
Ireland
Keepers are mostly over protected when it comes to aerial challenges for the ball in the box in games.

But you come into that area you might get smashed either way, it's the risk you take. But to most keepers that's never a penalty. It's a 50/50 ball he has to go for, he's just a fraction of a second late.

As a keeper I see that as no different, less dangerous and less painful than a clash of heads as it's not skull on skull.

Are we going to start seeing penalties when people clash heads now?
That’s always a foul though. If it was a slide tackle and he got there a second late and took the player though this wouldn’t be a debate. Why is it a debate when a keeper is a second late and punches a players head and not the ball?

I’m more weirded out by people not knowing what “free out” means. I thought that was fairly standard.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
5,794
Blatant penalty. Danilo heads the ball first and then Lloris punches and then elbows him in the face. Yellow card and dangerous play. Same as a studs up leg breaker but it doesn’t matter as he played the ball for some people.
 

JohnnyLaw

Full Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
2,060
Location
Sweden
The first pen for France is more deserving of a thread then this.

A slight body check and a theatrical fall by Mbappe could fool the ref.....but how the feck do the VAR refs explain themselves?!

Also, the foul by Bruno at the end.

VAR should have a brain check.
VAR can do nothing about it unless it’s clear and obvious that the referee has made a mistake. Since there was contact VAR can’t conclude that the referee has made an obvious mistake and therefore their hands are tied.

It seems the bad call is on the referee because he should’ve kept his composure and left it to VAR to deal with.
 

Gonçalo Motta

Full Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
627
Location
Porto, Portugal
That’s always a foul though. If it was a slide tackle and he got there a second late and took the player though this wouldn’t be a debate. Why is it a debate when a keeper is a second late and punches a players head and not the ball?

I’m more weirded out by people not knowing what “free out” means. I thought that was fairly standard.
I think that his point is that Lloris touched the ball before punching Danilo even though Danilo touched the ball first. It's still a fault either way
 

Nick7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
19,328
Location
Ireland
I think that his point is that Lloris touched the ball before punching Danilo even though Danilo touched the ball first. It's still a fault either way
That would still be a foul on a slide tackle though, he was late and took the player out. Getting contact on the ball doesn’t make something not a foul.
 

Handré1990

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
4,819
Location
In hibernation
More pertinent question is - did this warrant a new thread?
No, but seriously. I was sure the talk would be centered around how lucky Lloris was to continue, instead it seems about every third poster or so in the match thread disagreed with the foul completely! Now that you’ve taken the time to dismiss the relevance of the thread, perhaps you’ll share your own two cents on the matter?

Edit: and so you have! Good man :lol:
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Just to add: in the same way that playing the ball first doesn't mean a tackle can't be a foul, playing the ball first wouldn't automatically mean that smashing your arm into your opponent's head wouldn't be a foul. If it's deemed to be dangerous/reckless enough, contact with the ball doesn't matter. Playing the ball doesn't automatically justify anything else that happens in a challenge, otherwise people would be able to murder each other in follow throughs.

In this case that's irrelevant though, as the defender gets to the ball first anyway, making it even clearer that it's a foul.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,558
Free-out is standard/common, sure. At least it was when I was semi-fit enough to still play football.

It's not that commonly used by commentators, pundits and whatnot, though (at least I don't think so).
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,363
If a striker goes into a keeper with a high boot it's a foul. Same thing, it's just never ever given. About time.
But this wasn't the equivalent of a high boot. No such thing as a high hand for a goalkeeper.

It's one of those genuine 50/50 moments innthe air where one guy is going to get clattered. Nobody's fault, just one of those unfortunate circumstances.

Doesn't help that the Portugal player almost faked a fit of some sort.