Would you take Conte at United?

Would you want Conte at United?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1,013 47.1%
  • No

    Votes: 1,140 52.9%

  • Total voters
    2,153
Status
Not open for further replies.

EtH

Full Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,712
So no to one of the best managers in world football. Nothing in the Champs league? Explain to me what team he had that should of won the Champions league?
Explain to me what team he had that should have gone out at the group stage.
 

arnie_ni

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
15,200
To the end of the season definitely but I'd hope they could find a youngish manager with a long term plan eg the ajax manager
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
Explain to me what team he had that should have gone out at the group stage.
Before that season when was the last time Inter was in the Champions league.

Different yard sticks for different teams. Have the same standards for United today.

But I’ll answer it for you. 2012.
 

Tyrion

Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2014
Messages
5,197
Location
Ireland
What has become apparently clear is we have many fans who have learnt absolutely nothing from our recent history with managers since Fergie left.
I agree. I think a lot of fans stick to the "But Fergie got time!" rubbish and use it to argue against any sacking. That's like arguing that because Messi started for Barcelona as a teenager, all teenagers are fully developed by 18.
 

EtH

Full Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,712
Before that season when was the last time Inter was in the Champions league.

Different yard sticks for different teams. Have the same standards for United today.

But I’ll answer it for you. 2012.
They went out two years on the trot. And finished bottom of their group last season, FFS. He’s only been to the quarter finals once in his career.

He is pants in the CL.
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
13,986
It would be a massive roll of the dice to appoint Conte. He would likely stay for two seasons max and probably leave you in a state of real disruption when he goes. He’s probably the man who maximises your chance of short term
success though whilst Ronaldo is here.
 

VinzentFTW

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 28, 2021
Messages
814
Supports
Liverpool
We have tried that before and it didnt work. The thing we havent tried is a progressive coach. Ten Hag is my preferred one, with Enrique as a close second.
 

Hansi Fick

New Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2020
Messages
5,057
Supports
FC Bayern
We have tried that before and it didnt work. The thing we havent tried is a progressive coach. Ten Hag is my preferred one, with Enrique as a close second.
You tried Conte before? I must have missed that.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,391
Chelsea seem to be doing nicely with that tactic.
They’ve found a very good manager in Tuchel, who seems to fit the squad they assembled with very attacking wing backs and centre back depth. Maybe that’s just luck. Maybe they identified that’s the kind of manager the squad needed.

Before that I’m failing to see anything so special that we should be looking to replicate. 2 titles in 11 years? One of them being with a manager that failed with us.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,092
Our fanbase needs to realise, the club needs someone to manage the team - not a step dad for the fanbase.

Find another way of getting over your daddy issues. See a therapist or something.
 

Caesar2290

New Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
1,283
You'd think a fanbase that went through Jose Mourinho's football would be wiser than this. But nope, I keep hearing the dreaded similarities again: "He is going to win us trophies" "He is going to make us defensively solid"

Lads, he will feck off in 2 years while leaving behind the likes of Ashley Young and Lukaku. And then we'll need another rebuild and 500 million pounds to be competitive again. Antonio can feck right off.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,677
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Here's an idea, we stop thinking long term and short term and just appoint the best manager we can that's available and go from there? Long term or short term positions are reliant on the individuals performance in the role, not a condition to hire someone based on.
 

bond19821982

Last Man Standing champion 2019/20
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
10,423
Location
Nnc
Our fanbase needs to realise, the club needs someone to manage the team - not a step dad for the fanbase.

Find another way of getting over your daddy issues. See a therapist or something.
Fecking true. You have a team who conceeds goals as if they have a goal diarrhea , yet people won't take a serial winner now.

Feck off !
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,625
Location
London
Our fanbase needs to realise, the club needs someone to manage the team - not a step dad for the fanbase.

Find another way of getting over your daddy issues. See a therapist or something.
Oh man, I love your posts with regard to the cult of the manager. It is a fecking disease and one of the main reasons (in addition to the incompetent board) for the shambles we have been these years.
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,469
I'd take him now. Though we dint have the players for a five at the back might be an issue but good managers can usually deal with these things
 

BlueHaze

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
4,453
Don't want him anywhere near utd. He's a drama queen of the highest order not to mention he doesn't know how to rotate players.
I think he's a top manager no doubt about that and even though I'd want him here we've got to be honest, it would end in tears and I'm afraid quite quickly as well with this shit board.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,625
Location
London
You'd think a fanbase that went through Jose Mourinho's football would be wiser than this. But nope, I keep hearing the dreaded similarities again: "He is going to win us trophies" "He is going to make us defensively solid"

Lads, he will feck off in 2 years while leaving behind the likes of Ashley Young and Lukaku. And then we'll need another rebuild and 500 million pounds to be competitive again. Antonio can feck right off.
To be fair, Lukaku is better than any of our strikers. Maybe Ronaldo is on par with him, but that's it.

Young was a squad player. That cost them nothing. He probably is not much worse than the 55m AWB.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,247
Anyone thinking our next manager will last more than 2-3 seasons is deluded.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,625
Location
London
The United fan mentality is because we've had a spell with Mourinho and Van Gaal that didn't end well, we should never look for a top manager again.
It's like, 'Di Maria and Sanchez failed so let's just play Bebe forever, instead'. fecking absurd.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,407
Supports
Chelsea
The United fan mentality is because we've had spells with Mourinho and Van Gaal that didn't end well, we should never look for a top manager again.
You had the past it versions of those two aswell, Conte is far from that unfortunately.
 

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,441
The United fan mentality is because we've had spells with Mourinho and Van Gaal that didn't end well, we should never look for a top manager again.
I wonder why we are still buying World Class players after our experiences with Falcao and Di Maria? We should stick playing academy guys, who know and love the club!
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
They went out two years on the trot. And finished bottom of their group last season, FFS. He’s only been to the quarter finals once in his career.

He is pants in the CL.
Go speak to someone else. :lol:

There first season in the champions league was last season when Conte got them second after years of failure. Like I said 2011/2012.

If you don’t know your facts don’t criticise the man.
 

Mcking

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2017
Messages
6,015
Location
Nigeria
You'd think a fanbase that went through Jose Mourinho's football would be wiser than this. But nope, I keep hearing the dreaded similarities again: "He is going to win us trophies" "He is going to make us defensively solid"

Lads, he will feck off in 2 years while leaving behind the likes of Ashley Young and Lukaku. And then we'll need another rebuild and 500 million pounds to be competitive again. Antonio can feck right off.
Juventus won six consecutive titles after Conte left, Chelsea has won a UEFA Champions League title since Conte left, and has one of the best squads in the league. Inter Milan are in a better position than they have ever been.

The notion that Conte would leave us with a poor squad is a common misconception based on the fact Mourinho left us in a poor condition, and Mourinho and Conte are both great, successful managers.
 

Caesar2290

New Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
1,283
To be fair, Lukaku is better than any of our strikers. Maybe Ronaldo is on par with him, but that's it.

Young was a squad player. That cost them nothing. He probably is not much worse than the 55m AWB.
The point is, why the feck would you go after Conte, who will feck off in 2 years time when someone like Ten Hag is attainable? Ten Hag ticks all the boxes yet our fans want another Mourinho special. Crazy

Different squad now. Packed full of supposed winners and leaders right?
The point is, this short termist managers leave the team in a much worse condition as opposed to when they take other. Sure it works for team like Real or Chelsea, but I doubt our fanbase will approve us sliding in that direction.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,419
Location
left wing
See out the season with Ole and spend the intervening period nailing down Ten Hag to a lengthy contract and laying the groundwork for his preferred transfer targets.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,815
The issue with Conte is that the squad isn't suited for his preferred style and formation. Shaping it to his liking is just more investment in a different direction.
 

EtH

Full Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,712
The United fan mentality is because we've had spells with Mourinho and Van Gaal that didn't end well, we should never look for a top manager again.
Except neither of them were top managers when we appointed them. Also hard to call any manager with Conte’s CL record a top manager. That no name over at Ajax has done far more in Europe than Conte has with far less time and resources.
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
13,986
This has probably been discussed to an extent before, but with Solskjaer arguably closer to the sack than he has ever been, and Conte one of the names on many lips as things stand, I wish to discuss the concerns around a potential appointment.

Looking at Conte's record with his past three clubs, he's been successful, but has not stayed for too long at any of the clubs, and things ended sorely at each club, certainly in his last two. It is true his track record doesn't paint him as one for the long-term, and his tendency to fall out with people around his club is something for most clubs to worry about when appointing him, but is it something our club, in our current situation should really be worrying about?

I understand it is fantastic when you stumble on a manager who is good and will be there for the long haul, but I don't think that should be a criteria that should be seriously considered for a club of our standing when making a managerial appointment especially with the squad we have found ourselves with. I can understand the likes of Borussia Dortmund and Leipzig doing it because meticulous planning and smarts is probably the only way they can keep up with the clubs who spend much more than them, but Manchester United?

We have a squad - obviously with it's weaknesses, but arguably close to, if not ready to compete for the big titles, what are we thinking long-term for, why do we need a project? Are we going to start competing when the likes of Pogba, Ronaldo and Cavani are no longer here? If we are going to be waiting for a few years just to compete under each manager, then why have we been spending so much? I'm not arguing that structures shouldn't be put in place for smooth transitions between players and the continuous improvement of the squad, but why should the possibility of a manager not staying for more than a few years or not warming up to some members of the squad put us off from that particular manager?

Considering the amount we spend every window and the fact we will keep spending every window, surely the target should be to maximize our resources every given season. The managers we wish to appoint should be made to understand that, and if the manager looks like one good enough to do that, then surely, how long he will be staying at the club is not a matter of serious concern - when he fails, there will be other managers out here. The potential damage a manager appointed for the long haul could cause is much bigger than one that could be caused by a manager appointed to come in and win straightaway. With Conte, we can remove him without much hesitation if it doesn't work out, but with the long-term idea, we have to give him a few years, and if it still doesn't work out, then how does that benefit anyone?

I have seen quite a few mention how a Conte would leave our squad in a worse state than it is now, but even if it does happen, how much would it really hurt the club? Juventus won six straight titles after he left them, Chelsea and Inter Milan aren't doing too bad either. I just think we need to be much more ruthless, decisive and straightforward with our managerial appointments from now, certainly with the squad we have been able to get to. We needed the likes of Ralf Rangnick and Ten Haag when Mourinho left. They could still do a good job, but we don't need them now as much as we need Antonio Conte.
I think it is a roll of the dice with Conte. Arguably nobody out there is more likely to deliver silverware this year or next and have an immediate short-term impact, but I look at how the best clubs are currently run (City, Liverpool and Bayern) and they don’t try and indulge the short term when it comes at an inevitable cost. The problem is that if Ole has to be sacked, there are precious few obvious, alternative managers available.
 

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,441
Conte can be a total tool, but that's fine. We have to snap out of this habit of finding the perfect manager who "gets" Utd. Enough of this nostalgia and romantic non-sense. Liverpool gave us a blueprint on what NOT to do to get back to the top, and instead of avoiding those mistakes, we are following it to the tee. Absolutely sickening.

Get the best man possible for the job. Doesn't work out? Fine, sack him and move on to the next one. Doesn't work again? Fine. Try again. It should be no different to a player, you keep finding replacements till you find one of adequate quality. You don't stick with Obertans and McNairs for a reason. Manager should be no different.

All those fans who think sacking and hiring managers is not United DNA can feck right off. We've been a total joke, lapped up and lost under the red eyed mist of nostalgia.
 

Mickeza

still gets no respect
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
14,097
Location
Deepthroating information to Howard Nurse.
The point is, this short termist managers leave the team in a much worse condition as opposed to when they take other. Sure it works for team like Real or Chelsea, but I doubt our fanbase will approve us sliding in that direction.
To be fair I’m with you but the issue with LVG and Jose was that they were shit. And well past their peak. Conte is neither of those things.
 

Flexdegea

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
2,342
Wouldn't want him anywhere near us.


I understand some folk are desperate right now, but hes not the only manager available, be another chelsea w##ker managing us and a drama queen to go with it, going up against 3 of the best managers and clubs in Europe at the moment, but people think just a tweak and we can win the big prizes, it's all it takes.


If they getting a manager in I'd rather they actually made a positive progressive appointment, but highly doubt they even get that right.
 

Caesar2290

New Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
1,283
Except neither of them were top managers when we appointed them. Also hard to call any manager with Conte’s CL record a top manager. That no name over at Ajax has done far more in Europe than Conte has with far less time and resources.
And he plays the youth. And he won't feck off after 2 years if he's successful. And he plays attacking football as well. And he doesn't need to sign his preferred players or he throws a bitch fit. But nope, let's go with the "proven option" because our current manager is shite.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.