Television The Sandman

OleGunnar20

Full Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2018
Messages
2,190
Checked out at episode 4.

I found the universe really interesting, some super cool CGI and the story itself had me invested.

I just didn't think it was very well made overall though. Clunky dialogue with tons of exposition, half baked scenes, I dunno, just didn't like it.

Ah well! I'll give the books a go as I liked the story.
 

WI_Red

Redcafes Most Rested
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
12,135
Location
No longer in WI
Supports
Atlanta United
Didn’t want episode 6 to end. Absolutely loved it.
100%. Fantastic episode. I am wondering if this is what WoT noobs feel like watching the show. With no preconceptions of the story or characters it’s a wonderful experience.
 

decorativeed

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
12,385
Location
Tameside
I've been watching this with no knowledge of the character or story as my wife is a big fan of Neil Gaiman and has been looking forward to it. I really enjoyed the first episode in particular, and the next three were decent. We just watched the fifth one last night though and I did not enjoy that one at all. I get what they were trying to show, but I just did not care about any of the characters they introduced. They spent the best part of an hour introducing them and their lives to show us the consequences of John Dee's plan, but by the time they showed that I just wanted it to be over with! Then it took all of five minutes for him to be (seemingly) defeated. It just seemed like an unnecessarily long diversion from the story, particularly given the length of the previous few episodes.
 

WI_Red

Redcafes Most Rested
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
12,135
Location
No longer in WI
Supports
Atlanta United
I've been watching this with no knowledge of the character or story as my wife is a big fan of Neil Gaiman and has been looking forward to it. I really enjoyed the first episode in particular, and the next three were decent. We just watched the fifth one last night though and I did not enjoy that one at all. I get what they were trying to show, but I just did not care about any of the characters they introduced. They spent the best part of an hour introducing them and their lives to show us the consequences of John Dee's plan, but by the time they showed that I just wanted it to be over with! Then it took all of five minutes for him to be (seemingly) defeated. It just seemed like an unnecessarily long diversion from the story, particularly given the length of the previous few episodes.
Episode 6 was probably my favorite episode, so you have that to look forward to.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,049
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
I thought at first he's gonna be teaming up with Constantine to catch the bad guys. But up to episode 6 it looks like a very different movie. Stopped watching. Too phylosophical and too slow for me. Might speed up next season if there is next season but not looking forward to this
 

WI_Red

Redcafes Most Rested
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
12,135
Location
No longer in WI
Supports
Atlanta United
I thought at first he's gonna be teaming up with Constantine to catch the bad guys. But up to episode 6 it looks like a very different movie. Stopped watching. Too phylosophical and too slow for me. Might speed up next season if there is next season but not looking forward to this
It's Neil Gaiman, of course it is philosophical.
 

Dumbstar

We got another woman hater here.
Joined
Jul 18, 2002
Messages
21,251
Location
Viva Karius!
Supports
Liverpool
It's Neil Gaiman, of course it is philosophical.
But where's the Boom, Kaplunk, Splat, holy socks Batman? ;)

I thought this was a Spiderman spin-off but was relieved it's based off an actual book. I enjoyed it and tried to imagine watching what the author was trying to convey. The restaurant episode made much more sense once I did that.
 

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,997
But where's the Boom, Kaplunk, Splat, holy socks Batman? ;)

I thought this was a Spiderman spin-off but was relieved it's based off an actual book. I enjoyed it and tried to imagine watching what the author was trying to convey. The restaurant episode made much more sense once I did that.
Its based off a comic, not a book. 24 hours (the diner ep) is far darker in the comic and my favourite ever issue of any comic book ever released.
 

Scarlett Dracarys

( . Y . )
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
33,203
Location
New York
Not seen or read that one. I take it from the post it is worth it?
It's an animated movie not sure if that's your cup of tea. It's Tim Burton so it's very dark and a good story. I think it's one of the best animated film ever. I never read the book but if it's anything like the movie, it should be a good read. It was nominated for a few Oscars as well.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
9,999
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
Finished this today and really liked it, the guy who plays John Dee was pretty good.
 

altodevil

Odds winner of 'Odds or Evens 2023/2024'
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
17,499
I'm two episodes in and it is starting look and feel like a doctor who serial. Shame as the graphic novels are excellent. There's a lot of weird shoehorning too, but I guess it's got gaimans blessing.
 

Fingeredmouse

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
5,641
Location
Glasgow
I'm two episodes in and it is starting look and feel like a doctor who serial. Shame as the graphic novels are excellent. There's a lot of weird shoehorning too, but I guess it's got gaimans blessing.
What do you think are the deviations? I was particularly impressed by the recreation of the comic's feel, including the increase in quality as it progresses, so I'm interested in what you feel varies or is shoehorned.
 

Hugh Jass

Shave Dass
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
11,295
The first five episodes were brilliant. The last five were still good but not as good as the first five.
 

Shane88

Actually Nostradamus
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
35,225
Location
Targaryen loyalist
I googled the actress who played Rose because I thought she was absolutely dreadful.

No fecking wonder, this is her first acting gig.
 

FrankDrebin

Don't call me Shirley
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
20,389
Location
Police Squad
Supports
USA Manchester Red Socks
Personally felt Jenna Coleman's performance as Constantine was the worst, out of all of the performers.
 

CassiusClaymore

Is it Gaizka Mendieta?
Scout
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
35,847
Location
None of your business mate
Supports
The greatest team in history
Finished this earlier in the week and it was a show of two halves for me. First 5 episodes were good with a great cast and a decent story and the second half was absolutely dire with dumb characters and dumb writing. That episode in the hotel at the serial killer convention was laughable.

Sandwiched between all of that was a wonderful standalone episode (6) that I see everyone else loved as well. Just a bizarre show.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,528
Just finished watching this now - I watched the first episode weeks ago, and liked it well enough, but was sidetracked, and then bingewatched the rest of it now.

I agree with what was said above - the first five were good. It's been a long time since I read the comic book, but I remembered several aspects of the story (the duel in Hell, not least, which I thought was well executed in the show). The last episodes were indeed a bit shite - the serial killer convention stuff didn't work at all. The last episode was also shite - the animated cat thing was just...generic crap, and the live action part was essentially a mediocre Twilight Zone effort.

And - yeah - the one in the middle was very good. Absolutely very good. I enjoyed the dynamic between Sandman/Dream (in general: good casting, liked him) and Death (excellent casting, nailed it for me - again, based on what I remember from the comic book.

I will definitely check out the new season, but I'm very skeptical - the trend is that these adaptation series get progressively more shit.

Also - the female Constantine character wasn't very good. In the comic book (the main one, where Sandman is trapped and then gets his gear back), that was good ol' John Constantine - as far as I remember (as in: male). I don't mind that switch, as such, but the character just wasn't very interesting/well portrayed. Cynical lesbian who wasn't all that cynical after all - bah, meh, yeah.

ETA Not to mention: John Constantine is completely fecked up: an alcoholic, chain smoker, hardly able to function at times. The female Constantine looked far too healthy and didn't come across as nearly fecked up enough. For someone familiar with the comics, the scene where Sandman appeared at her place (which was kind of Hollywood messy) just seemed ridiculous. Constantine shouldn't be Hollywood messy: he/she should be genuinely shabby as feck.

Also - shouldn't Constantine be pronounced "constanteen" (not "constantyne")?
 
Last edited:

Norman Brownbutter

ask him about his bath time mishap
Joined
Nov 4, 2020
Messages
1,668
Just finished watching this now - I watched the first episode weeks ago, and liked it well enough, but was sidetracked, and then bingewatched the rest of it now.

I agree with what was said above - the first five were good. It's been a long time since I read the comic book, but I remembered several aspects of the story (the duel in Hell, not least, which I thought was well executed in the show). The last episodes were indeed a bit shite - the serial killer convention stuff didn't work at all. The last episode was also shite - the animated cat thing was just...generic crap, and the live action part was essentially a mediocre Twilight Zone effort.

And - yeah - the one in the middle was very good. Absolutely very good. I enjoyed the dynamic between Sandman/Dream (in general: good casting, liked him) and Death (excellent casting, nailed it for me - again, based on what I remember from the comic book.

I will definitely check out the new season, but I'm very skeptical - the trend is that these adaptation series get progressively more shit.

Also - the female Constantine character wasn't very good. In the comic book (the main one, where Sandman is trapped and then gets his gear back), that was good ol' John Constantine - as far as I remember (as in: male). I don't mind that switch, as such, but the character just wasn't very interesting/well portrayed. Cynical lesbian who wasn't all that cynical after all - bah, meh, yeah.

ETA Not to mention: John Constantine is completely fecked up: an alcoholic, chain smoker, hardly able to function at times. The female Constantine looked far too healthy and didn't come across as nearly fecked up enough. For someone familiar with the comics, the scene where Sandman appeared at her place (which was kind of Hollywood messy) just seemed ridiculous. Constantine shouldn't be Hollywood messy: he/she should be genuinely shabby as feck.

Also - shouldn't Constantine be pronounced "constanteen" (not "constantyne")?
The original pronunciation of the name is Contantyne. It didnt become Constanteen until the 2005 Keanu Reeves movie that also changed the character from blonde Liverpudlian to Black haired LA douche. When Matt Ryan took over the role they brought back the blonde Brit persona but kept the "teen" pronunciation. Gaiman has said that it was Moore who named the character, and "Tyne" is how he pronounced it.

As for way theres no John in the show, it's a rights issue. Bad Robot had a version of the character ready to go with a live action version Justice League Dark. Watchers of Legends of Tomorrow will also notice that Matt Ryan was quickly pulled out of that show around the same time that the deal was made only to return as completely different character. Supposedly JJ ask Warner for exclusive rights to the character for merchandising reasons and didnt want any other versions of the character out at the same time. So no John in Legends, or in Sandman. Having Johnna at that point seemed like the solid choice, according to Gaiman.
 

Fingeredmouse

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
5,641
Location
Glasgow
Just finished watching this now - I watched the first episode weeks ago, and liked it well enough, but was sidetracked, and then bingewatched the rest of it now.

I agree with what was said above - the first five were good. It's been a long time since I read the comic book, but I remembered several aspects of the story (the duel in Hell, not least, which I thought was well executed in the show). The last episodes were indeed a bit shite - the serial killer convention stuff didn't Also - the female Constantine character wasn't very good. In the comic book (the main one, where Sandman is trapped and then gets his gear back), that was good ol' John Constantine - as far as I remember (as in: male). I don't mind that switch, as such, but the character just wasn't very interesting/well portrayed. Cynical lesbian who wasn't all that cynical after all - bah, meh, yeah.

Also - shouldn't Constantine be pronounced "constanteen" (not "constantyne")?
I still think it's the closest we've had to the Constantine we know and love. Certainly I trust Gaiman to handle him better than most and the cameo in the TV show is very similar to the cameo in the comic, including the merciful death. And it was good to hear the name pronounced the British way, as it should be.

As for season two, I assume they'll continue with the faithful adaptation (including oddities such as Dream of a Thousand Cats - which I liked as an aside and thought the second best episode of the series - the one shots are the best in the comic too I think) and the quality will depend on what you think of the Sandman story. I'm fairly confident I'll love it, but undoubtedly my quality control is off on something I grew up buying on publication and is therefore woven through my life.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,528
The original pronunciation of the name is Contantyne. It didnt become Constanteen until the 2005 Keanu Reeves movie that also changed the character from blonde Liverpudlian to Black haired LA douche. When Matt Ryan took over the role they brought back the blonde Brit persona but kept the "teen" pronunciation. Gaiman has said that it was Moore who named the character, and "Tyne" is how he pronounced it.

As for way theres no John in the show, it's a rights issue. Bad Robot had a version of the character ready to go with a live action version Justice League Dark. Watchers of Legends of Tomorrow will also notice that Matt Ryan was quickly pulled out of that show around the same time that the deal was made only to return as completely different character. Supposedly JJ ask Warner for exclusive rights to the character for merchandising reasons and didnt want any other versions of the character out at the same time. So no John in Legends, or in Sandman. Having Johnna at that point seemed like the solid choice, according to Gaiman.
Cool, didn't know that (about the rights).

When I read the comic book back in the day, I thought of him as "constanteen", though - it had nothing to do with the Reeves movie. "Constantyne" just sounds wrong in my head - but if that is indeed the standard British pronunciation (as @Fingeredmouse says), I stand corrected.

(The Reeves movie was shit, by the way.)

As for the part in bold - fair enough, I guess. I still think she was too...clean. I mean, if you imagine her as John Constantine, it sort of works in terms of the role itself and its importance, it's a cameo after all (and I'm not saying she was so bad it ruined the thing - obviously not). But they could've had her drink a bit and smoke a bit, surely? That's what JC does.