Transfer Tweets - Manchester United - 2023/24

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,797
Location
US
De Gea was offered and agreed an extension on lower wages. If you are happy with Onana then thats your view but he has been awful imo so far. His international form crap as well so at least hes been consistent. Keeping de Gea meant we could have used the £50m for Onana on a CH to replace Maguire and negate the need ofr Evans as we were by then Skint ! Onana All round has been a Awful purchase and one you grasp at straws to try and say otherwise. The whole summer was terrible and the previous one not much better.
DeGea did not accept substantially lower wages; unless I am missing something. He was offered a contract extension at high wages which was nixed.

To say Onana has been poor is not backed up by stats; he is doing fine in PL. Besides that, he is one of the best at playing out the back. We have many issues; Onana isn‘t one.
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,797
Location
US
If we don‘t get a replacement for Martial this window, it will be another example of how poorly run this club is.
 

Paul778

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2017
Messages
1,189
Location
London
... or we could have used the 55m from Mount.

... or if we hadn't spent 80m+ on Anthony the season before.

If buts and maybes. We're not in the room and ultimately ETH expressed his priorities. You can't look at these things in isolation.

Completely agree about last summer and the summer before. This is the only bright side to this - it does seem that they have finally learned a very expensive lesson. Everyone expects us to put experienced professionals with a track record of performing recruitment to a high level at other top clubs in place. Who would have thought it would take so long? (one chicken, two chickens, three chickens - it's not in place yet!)
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,431
If we don‘t get a replacement for Martial this window, it will be another example of how poorly run this club is.
It says we're in a bad position for FFP this season. As has been obvious for a while. I knew not to expect any incomings.

A result of being badly run for years but could be seen coming a mile off.
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
36,849
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
Tier 2:

More info:

Forson rejected the most recent contract offer from United. Multiple clubs in the Premier League and Championship are interested in him.
 
Last edited:

GBBQ

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
4,808
Location
Ireland
If we don‘t get a replacement for Martial this window, it will be another example of how poorly run this club is.
Meh. The season is a write off. Even if we buy a striker we won’t have enough to make top 4. We’re 11 points off top 4 (essentially 12 with the goal difference). No striker is gonna fix the problem but paying an inflated fee will have an impact on our summer transfer budget. Let’s just limp over the line with what we have and give INEOS time to assess team and management.

Given how we’ve spent money in the past few windows I’m not surprised that we’re extremely reluctant to invest. Let’s get Weghorst in again!
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,640

More info:

Forson rejected the most recent contract offer from United. Multiple clubs in the Premier League and Championship are interested in him.
Bit of a journeyman even at youth level so wouldn't be surprised to see him go, he's had a load of clubs already.
 

Big Ben Foster

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
12,834
Location
BR -> MI -> TX
Supports
Also support Vasco da Gama
Tier 2:

More info:

Forson rejected the most recent contract offer from United. Multiple clubs in the Premier League and Championship are interested in him.
That's too bad. Should've put him up Forsale when we had the chance.
 

Von Mistelroum

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2015
Messages
4,061
I really don't know why we're looking for a striker. Getting a decent winger who can actually put in some crosses or passes for our current striker would have a 100% greater effect. No point getting another striker in to get zero chances.
 

Toshey

Full Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2021
Messages
819
Supports
Levski Sofia
Wondering why we loaned Hugill... One injury to Hojlund and we are royally screwed.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,164
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Wondering why we loaned Hugill... One injury to Hojlund and we are royally screwed.
Because he'll actually play games at Burton, which is far more important for his development than waiting for Hojlund to get injured.
 

spwd

likes: servals, breasts, rylan clark and zooey
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
8,740
Location
Lyecestershyre
DeGea did not accept substantially lower wages; unless I am missing something. He was offered a contract extension at high wages which was nixed.

To say Onana has been poor is not backed up by stats; he is doing fine in PL. Besides that, he is one of the best at playing out the back. We have many issues; Onana isn‘t one.
Wow :lol: :houllier:
 

pascell

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
14,197
Location
Sir Alex Ferguson Stand
The guy's got one striker. On this issue, he doesn't need to make excuses. The problem is just there for all to see.
I'm sorry but he dug his own grave with the signings he made in summer and his use of the budget given.

Him now saying he only has no room for another striker due to FFP is a feeble excuse.

He shouldn't have spent on bringing in Onana and Mount, if he didn't feel he would have enough firepower upfront, that's after spending £64m on Hojlund.

We've scored 24 goals in 21 PL games, how can you absolve him of blame? He's the fecking manager!
 

James35

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
3,940
Location
Cardiff
I'm sorry but he dug his own grave with the signings he made in summer and his use of the budget given.

Him now saying he only has no room for another striker due to FFP is a feeble excuse.

He shouldn't have spent on bringing in Onana and Mount, if he didn't feel he would have enough firepower upfront, that's after spending £64m on Hojlund.

We've scored 24 goals in 21 PL games, how can you absolve him of blame? He's the fecking manager!
I agree. Us being skint is the main reason he is still here in my opinion. I hope the new regime shows some sense and gets rid in the summer. A horrendous season this has been and more likely continue to be.
 

lysglimt

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
15,292
Wow doesn't even cover it :)

DeGea was slaughtered for making 3-4 errors that resulted in goals - it took Onana 1 month to make more mistakes than that. In addition he almost single-handedly knocked us out of the C.L.
 

hellhunter

Eurofighter
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
18,056
Location
Stuttgart, Germany
Supports
Karlsruher SC
The money wasted in last few years has finally restricted us even from affording loans
I'm struggling to understand this. How can we not afford a loan when Reguilon's ended and we loaned out high earners in VdB and Sancho? That would mean we budgeted under the assumption of sending them out on loan
 

Dannn411

Full Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2022
Messages
2,468
I'm struggling to understand this. How can we not afford a loan when Reguilon's ended and we loaned out high earners in VdB and Sancho? That would mean we budgeted under the assumption of sending them out on loan
I assume the club is trying to save up to load up in the summer because the team is still very far away from where we need to be on the pitch. What is the point of a loan in January? we're not doing anything this season anyways. Might as well save whatever little firepower you have for the summer. Big sales to free up money are also more likely in the summer.
 

sleepehead

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
129
I'm struggling to understand this. How can we not afford a loan when Reguilon's ended and we loaned out high earners in VdB and Sancho? That would mean we budgeted under the assumption of sending them out on loan
Maybe our budget was based on us not crashing out of Europe. All that revenue gone screws us up bad
 

Rockets Redglare

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 23, 2015
Messages
2,617
Wow doesn't even cover it :)

DeGea was slaughtered for making 3-4 errors that resulted in goals - it took Onana 1 month to make more mistakes than that. In addition he almost single-handedly knocked us out of the C.L.
Onana being shit doesn’t mean that De Gea wasn’t.
 

parmenio

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 8, 2023
Messages
227
Onana being shit doesn’t mean that De Gea wasn’t.
Yup but he was less Shit than Onana and we didn’t need to pay a transfer fee to get him to stay on. It’s laughable that ETH for the second summer in a row knew he over spent and come the Jan window we are still chronically short of fire power this is down to ETH and no one else. Hopefully we are cleaning shop and getting our finances in order for the summer so we can go again under the new set up. One that includes a competent manager
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,797
Location
US
Yup but he was less Shit than Onana and we didn’t need to pay a transfer fee to get him to stay on. It’s laughable that ETH for the second summer in a row knew he over spent and come the Jan window we are still chronically short of fire power this is down to ETH and no one else. Hopefully we are cleaning shop and getting our finances in order for the summer so we can go again under the new set up. One that includes a competent manager
De Gea was way worse than Onana. I stuck up for him for a long time but he was getting worse, on top of his shortcomings it was untenable.

Everyone wanted rid of him, now you all saying we should have kept him :houllier:
 

Woziak

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
3,644
Lining up his excuses ready for when he's hopefully potted in summer.
That’s the real reason, Sir Jim doesn’t trust him with even a loan deal. They are almost saying you spent £400m in the last two seasons and the team is shite because if you!

They are looking at the next manager which may have been accelerated as Liverpool needing an elite manager might mean United go early.

The quicker ETH leaves the better !
 

parmenio

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 8, 2023
Messages
227
De Gea was way worse than Onana. I stuck up for him for a long time but he was getting worse, on top of his shortcomings it was untenable.

Everyone wanted rid of him, now you all saying we should have kept him :houllier:
I didn’t want rid. But if we were going to replace him we should have got a decent replacement. This ball playing crap is a joke he needs to keep the ball out the net first and foremost. Our team has for more pressing issues than GK. Look at our striker depth. We have one who is a novice and the other is worse than an eggshell who never tries when he is playing. We spent 200m in the summer and managed to make our squad worse and Onana certainly hasn’t helped.
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,797
Location
US
I didn’t want rid. But if we were going to replace him we should have got a decent replacement. This ball playing crap is a joke he needs to keep the ball out the net first and foremost. Our team has for more pressing issues than GK. Look at our striker depth. We have one who is a novice and the other is worse than an eggshell who never tries when he is playing. We spent 200m in the summer and managed to make our squad worse and Onana certainly hasn’t helped.
True, but Onana is not the issue. De Gea‘s contract ran out: he isn‘t comfortable on the ball and too expensive even on reduced wages: it was the right call.

Of course if Onana keeps having wobbles I‘m going to eat my words.
 

parmenio

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 8, 2023
Messages
227
True, but Onana is not the issue. De Gea‘s contract ran out: he isn‘t comfortable on the ball and too expensive even on reduced wages: it was the right call.

Of course if Onana keeps having wobbles I‘m going to eat my words.
The big plus about Onana was meant to be playing ball out from the back. Maguire and Evans kills that stone dead plus the fact we don’t have a functioning midfield. Then add the fact he’s terrible at keeping the ball out the net. Interesting to see who starts tomorrow. Could get an extended run in the team .
 

lysglimt

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
15,292
De Gea was way worse than Onana. I stuck up for him for a long time but he was getting worse, on top of his shortcomings it was untenable.
No he seriously wasn't. You can argue that DDG wasn't good enough sure - but he was never worse than Onana has been.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,341
We had to move De Gea on and sign a good keeper to replace him. Not one with some truly abysmal traits like Onana.