Transfer Tweets - Manchester United - 2023/24

Sea-Cow

Full Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
1,589
£70M for Branthwaite, feck off :houllier: :lol:
Why do you think that is out of bounds? I am actually surprised by that number and would be willing to bet that there is no chance Everton sell him for that amount and it would take at least 85M. He's young and English and they aren't going to get relegated, so I imagine they would point to Harry Maguire and laugh if we offered 70M.
 

Redstain

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2019
Messages
1,306
I would take players who are young and have everything to prove like Branthwaite / Olise over some of the more senior players the club over the last few years has recruited or been linked with in prior windows. The profile of individuals that are closer to retirement / decline like your Rabiot's, Pavard, Arnautovic etc.

The new recruitment structure won't have to rewrite the script in identifying targets, the club has typically been linked with the right talents over time but rather can the new people in place can commemorate great value while negotiating. That's where the distinction is, it's a reason why Dan James has been one of the club's best signings in recent history, limited player on the field respectively but great in value proposition allowing the club to make a profit on his departure.

This should be the judgement on how well this new structure establishes itself.
 

UnitedSofa

You'll Never Walk Away
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
6,793
Moaning that £70M is too much but then also moaning that Chelsea got a steal at purchasing £40M for Palmer (but at the time claimed it was too much for a player who has had 19 appearances for City)

If you want a good player, you’re gonna have to pay for him, swear this forum still lives in the early 2010’s where you the sorts of player you’d get for £40M is VASTLY different to the player you get for £40M nowadays. Ronaldo went for £80M in 2009 and that was seen as astronomical now! £80M now gets you Antony.

While it seems a lot, this forum would bitch and moan if City got him for £70M and complain why we didn’t do the deal “because he’s clearly good enough”
 

Mylock

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
666
Branthwaite is worth about 40m max, we have to stop paying these stupid prices for unproven players.
 

UnitedSofa

You'll Never Walk Away
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
6,793
Branthwaite is worth about 40m max, we have to stop paying these stupid prices for unproven players.
Is he feck!

£70M is reasonable.

I’ll put it to you this way….. how much, if you had to, would you sell Mainoo for? Then apply that to Branthwaite, who had had as much as, if not more of an impact than Mainoo has.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,201
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
£80M now gets you Antony.
Poor example, it’s widely acknowledged that we hugely overpaid for Antony. He is valued at €35m (£29.8m)on transfermarkt currently and even that is a depreciation on what we were initially quoted.
£70m for Branthwaite is steep based on what we paid for our current CBs.Its twice what we paid for Varane!
 

UnitedSofa

You'll Never Walk Away
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
6,793
Poor example, it’s widely acknowledged that we hugely overpaid for Antony. He is valued at €35m (£29.8m)on transfermarkt currently and even that is a depreciation on what we were initially quoted.
£70m for Branthwaite is steep based on what we paid for our current CBs.Its twice what we paid for Varane!
Ok, how about a different exampe, Gvardiol, he was around £80M if not more if I remember correctly. Is he worth just as much as he? Who has not exactly lit up the PL when he has played
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,201
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
Ok, how about a different exampe, Gvardiol, he was around £80M if not more if I remember correctly. Is he worth just as much as he? Who has not exactly lit up the PL when he has played
Comparing to Mainoo/Gvardiol is a flawed way to value a player. By that logic we could also say United signed Garnacho, a player who could wind up being our POTY this season, for £420k. Let’s double that to £1m and offer that for Branthwaite. What do you think Everton will say?
His market value is €25m (£21.3m) so yes, for nearly 3 times that they can keep him. We will find cheaper players with just as much potential elsewhere if our scouts and Ashworth/Berrada are worth their salt!
 

AneRu

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
3,160
Is he feck!

£70M is reasonable.

I’ll put it to you this way….. how much, if you had to, would you sell Mainoo for? Then apply that to Branthwaite, who had had as much as, if not more of an impact than Mainoo has.
Same here, if given a chance I would pay £150m for Braithwaite and Onana. Young British talent in defense more often than not pays off, look at Shaw injuries notwithstanding , Rio back in the day and even the likes of White for Arsenal. It's also very hard to find players with a perfect blend of physicality and technique like those two possess.
 

kaku06

Full Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Messages
2,394
Is he feck!

£70M is reasonable.

I’ll put it to you this way….. how much, if you had to, would you sell Mainoo for? Then apply that to Branthwaite, who had had as much as, if not more of an impact than Mainoo has.
70m is stupid money for a player that’s just broken through forget about proven anything whether you like it or not.

As for Mainoo, right now he’s around 40m max too for the same reasons as branthwaite and that should be the price for him.
 

Red00012

Full Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
12,229
Moaning that £70M is too much but then also moaning that Chelsea got a steal at purchasing £40M for Palmer (but at the time claimed it was too much for a player who has had 19 appearances for City)

If you want a good player, you’re gonna have to pay for him, swear this forum still lives in the early 2010’s where you the sorts of player you’d get for £40M is VASTLY different to the player you get for £40M nowadays. Ronaldo went for £80M in 2009 and that was seen as astronomical now! £80M now gets you Antony.

While it seems a lot, this forum would bitch and moan if City got him for £70M and complain why we didn’t do the deal “because he’s clearly good enough”
They can keep him if they want £70 million . We should never pay that amount of money up front ever again . £40 mill plus add ons is fine
 

Mylock

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
666
Same here, if given a chance I would pay £150m for Braithwaite and Onana. Young British talent in defense more often than not pays off, look at Shaw injuries notwithstanding , Rio back in the day and even the likes of White for Arsenal. It's also very hard to find players with a perfect blend of physicality and technique like those two possess.
Are you having a laugh? Young British defenders are overrated and overpriced like we were fleeced with Harry and Wan bisska.
 

Mylock

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
666
Is he feck!

£70M is reasonable.

I’ll put it to you this way….. how much, if you had to, would you sell Mainoo for? Then apply that to Branthwaite, who had had as much as, if not more of an impact than Mainoo has.
70m is stupid money for a player that’s just broken through forget about proven anything whether you like it or not.

As for Mainoo, right now he’s around 40m max too for the same reasons as branthwaite and that should be the price for him.
We won't be playing these stupid fees under ineos.
 

100

binary bot
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
10,990
Location
HELLO
Those figures are a lot easier to stomach with a decent core. We’re in an awkward position where prices are going to be more off-putting due to past experiences and a poor squad. Hopefully a rejuvenated transfer structure can do its job because they will be unavoidable to an extent.
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,596
Location
Manc
The problem I have with this story valuing Braithwaite at 70 million is that, at that price United would be paying the maximum premium for him this summer.

Wait 1-2 seasons and he might actually be worth that value. But currently it’s 1 good season = 70 million. I’d say no thanks, United need to be smarter with their cash.

Ferguson for example was touted as 100+ million last summer, but he hasn’t looked close to that valuation since.

Players having good form or big potential are not automatically guaranteed to succeed.
 

E-mal

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
3,660
Same here, if given a chance I would pay £150m for Braithwaite and Onana. Young British talent in defense more often than not pays off, look at Shaw injuries notwithstanding , Rio back in the day and even the likes of White for Arsenal. It's also very hard to find players with a perfect blend of physicality and technique like those two possess.
Thank God you are not in charge of our recruitment. Neither are good enough to play front foot football
 

led_scholes

Full Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
2,457
The problem I have with this story valuing Braithwaite at 70 million is that, at that price United would be paying the maximum premium for him this summer.

Wait 1-2 seasons and he might actually be worth that value. But currently it’s 1 good season = 70 million. I’d say no thanks, United need to be smarter with their cash.

Ferguson for example was touted as 100+ million last summer, but he hasn’t looked close to that valuation since.

Players having good form or big potential are not automatically guaranteed to succeed.
Or we can structure a deal with massive add-ons but not based just on league appearances etc. More like titles. I think Rooney was like that? Eventually, if we win a PL title I doubt we would care if he just become 70m squad player in a team that wins the league.
 

Gordon S

Full Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
3,671
Fully agree on Branthwaite. He looks promising but going much further than 40m would be nuts. We just have to play it smarter going forward.
 

ayushreddevil9

Foootball hinders the adrenaline of transfers.
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
10,281
Or we can structure a deal with massive add-ons but not based just on league appearances etc. More like titles. I think Rooney was like that? Eventually, if we win a PL title I doubt we would care if he just become 70m squad player in a team that wins the league.
As if Everton will agree to that.
 

izak

Full Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Messages
1,430
Supports
Glory Glory Red Devils
Fully agree on Branthwaite. He looks promising but going much further than 40m would be nuts. We just have to play it smarter going forward.
It's not about paying stupid money, it should be about the quality of the players, would he fit the managers style of play, is a comfortable on the ball, how good is his one touch passing, how good is his first touch, is he aggressive and controlled when tackling, all this question have to be answered before shell out a stupid money on him.
 

jesperjaap

Full Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
5,739
Tier 2:

United want to bring in a new athletic centre back and younger midfielder.
I like Braithwaite but certainly dont get the fuss over Onana....what are we talking £ 120-150m for the pair, that is ludicrous. Just watching European games the last couple of weeks we had Enzo Fernandez go to Benfica for under £10m lat year, Alan Varela to Porto under £10m, Lukeba for for £30m odd to Germany. We had links to all of them.

And we are rumoured to be spending out on these two. Just look at some of the top top midfielders and defenders around Europe at the moment including those in Portugal. Sorry I know its premiership prices but we would me mad to buy either of these two, especially Onana who is for me limited
 

diarm

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Messages
16,785
I’d imagine we’re waiting to see if Everton get another points deduction. If they go down, any fees for the two lads are likely to be far lower.
 

ManRed

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
2,081
Location
London
Why do you think that is out of bounds? I am actually surprised by that number and would be willing to bet that there is no chance Everton sell him for that amount and it would take at least 85M. He's young and English and they aren't going to get relegated, so I imagine they would point to Harry Maguire and laugh if we offered 70M.
This is the mentality why we have overpaid for average players in Harry, Antony etc.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,016
Location
Dublin, Ireland
I like Braithwaite but certainly dont get the fuss over Onana....what are we talking £ 120-150m for the pair, that is ludicrous. Just watching European games the last couple of weeks we had Enzo Fernandez go to Benfica for under £10m lat year, Alan Varela to Porto under £10m, Lukeba for for £30m odd to Germany. We had links to all of them.

And we are rumoured to be spending out on these two. Just look at some of the top top midfielders and defenders around Europe at the moment including those in Portugal. Sorry I know its premiership prices but we would me mad to buy either of these two, especially Onana who is for me limited
And a year later Enzo Fernandez cost more than 100m and still isn’t up to speed in the PL
 

Sea-Cow

Full Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
1,589
The problem I have with this story valuing Braithwaite at 70 million is that, at that price United would be paying the maximum premium for him this summer.

Wait 1-2 seasons and he might actually be worth that value. But currently it’s 1 good season = 70 million. I’d say no thanks, United need to be smarter with their cash.

Ferguson for example was touted as 100+ million last summer, but he hasn’t looked close to that valuation since.

Players having good form or big potential are not automatically guaranteed to succeed.
Yes of course, there are no guarantees with transfers. And ideally we could wait and see if Braithwaite has second season struggles next year with Everton, but he could possibly improve and then his price would go up even further, or a Chelsea could swoop in ahead of us, or any number of things. And in the meantime would we be going with the same bunch of injury prone, or disaster prone, or old-age prone, CB group?

I am just surprised by the reaction to a quote of 70M for a young Englishman currently thriving in the league and that looks like he could step in tomorrow for us. What would Sporting or Benfica demand for Diomande or Antonio Silva? Surely it would be something similar, if not more.
 

Sea-Cow

Full Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
1,589
This is the mentality why we have overpaid for average players in Harry, Antony etc.
Is it the same mentality that lead to paying record amounts for Rio and Rooney? Or paying the large fee for Rasmus after only 9 games or whatever at Atalanta?