Erik ten Hag - Manchester United manager / awaiting clarity from the club over his position

Should ETH be kept on or fired by INEOS


  • Total voters
    2,032
  • Poll closed .

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,688
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
Who? Ogunneye? Jackson? I'd rather not give an 18 year old, who's only in the squad to make up the numbers, a debut into this shit show.
I think there is no upside to play Evans and/or Casemiro. They're both finished as footballers, if a youth CB plays and has the same terrible game as them, at least in the medium and long, it could work towards his development.
 

Robbie Boy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
28,555
Location
Dublin
Yeah and if not for the fact we have a team of internationals that have cost hundreds of millions to assemble we'd probably be down there with them.
For sure. 8th is farcical, but without huge pieces of luck, we should be further down the table.
 

Robbie Boy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
28,555
Location
Dublin
Luton have more quality.
Sheffield United literally finished 11 points ahead of them last season. Luton were seen as massive underdogs coming up and were tipped to finish bottom of the league. Christ, you're so fecking argumentative.
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,883
They would basically give full power to the manager and not even consider sacking him, but at the moment where the fanbase would become unanimous in wanting him sacked (usually with a 6 months delay), they would sack the manager (and usually hire the manager the fanbase wants). They were an extremely reactive owners.
Let's just recall the fanbase wanted ETH. Now they don't. It might be worth considering the fanbase don't have a fekkin clue. Of course the Glazers hired and fired the managers to humour the fans. They knew it would make no difference because the problems lay elsewhere. Specifically it lay with them giving the keys to the club to accountants and marketing managers. Ultimately that culminated in resigning Ronaldo, the ultimate anti-football decision. Such extraordinarily bad stewardship won't be reversed overnight.
 
Last edited:

Gavinb33

Full Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
2,931
Location
Watching the TV or is it watching me
Ofcourse Evans was asked if we could still play. Just like players use injections to delay surgery. We're relying on Casemiro as the other cb. What was our options, Amrabat and Casemiro together?
I think there is no upside to play Evans and/or Casemiro. They're both finished as footballers, if a youth CB plays and has the same terrible game as them, at least in the medium and long, it could work towards his development.
Play a young player with Evans and Casemiro and go 5 at the back is protects the injured and infirm and the young player too, in these games why try and be anything other than hard to beat we haven't won in god knows what we have injuries piling up like anything why stick with what hasn't been working and isn't working out of what your own stubborn ideology
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
40,069
Location
Cooper Station
Sheffield United literally finished 11 points ahead of them last season. Luton were seen as mssdonr underdogs coming up and were tipped to finish bottom of the league. Christ, you're so fecking argumentative.
Last season yeah, there was two transfer windows in between and Luton signed better players.

I'm not being argumentative haha, I just don't agree with you. We are debating, that is the entire point of the forum mate.
 

Yagami

Good post resistant
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
13,722
I can proudly say I've been wanting him out for close to a year now :D
I had my doubts after the first transfer window. A transfer window everyone loved at the time but now realises how poor it actually was.
 

Robbie Boy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
28,555
Location
Dublin
Last season yeah, there was two transfer windows in between and Luton signed better players.

I'm not being argumentative haha, I just don't agree with you. We are debating, that is the entire point of the forum mate.
Right. Well I think they're the worst coached side in the league. We'll leave it there as it's a really fecking innocuous "debate".
 

spwd

likes: servals, breasts, rylan clark and zooey
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
8,880
Location
Lyecestershyre
No problem with that. He gets the job for 3 games and he doesn't have to rip his contract at Sky Sports beyond this month.

Players need to see that glare of his from within 5 meters at least once in their lifetimes.
Yeah I've said this a while ago, get him in in some capacity to give the useless feckers a kick up the arse.
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,688
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
Play a young player with Evans and Casemiro and go 5 at the back is protects the injured and infirm and the young player too, in these games why try and be anything other than hard to beat we haven't won in god knows what we have injuries piling up like anything why stick with what hasn't been working and isn't working out of what your own stubborn ideology
It really is that simple, Casemiro can hardly play as a DM these days, him as a CB is a guaranteed terrible game. We all knew it, Crystal Palace knew it.
 

Djemba-Djemba

Full Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
21,567
Location
Manchester
He's been talking some amount of absolute bollox lately.
It seems to happen to every manager right near the end.

They start to come out with complete bullshit, they start bigging up their own individual records and throwing the players and Utd's history under the bus. Bringing up the 2004/5 season a few days ago and falsely claiming we'd never made back to back FA Cup finals.

Heads gone.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,735
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Well you could and set up the rest of the team to you know, actually protect them for a change.
Going to a back 3/ultra defensive and counter at this point is an absolute waste of time.
Well then we suffer playing out of form players out of position. The kids need to make a debut and will eventually HAVE to play in situations like this, otherwise why give them experience? Mainoo and Garnacho are doing it at only a year or two older.
They do not have to get thrown into a dysfunctional side and I think you know that's not how anyone would expect these kids to make their debut. Mainoo and Garnacho have got their on merit, these guys are there because there's no one else.
It wouldn't be entirely fair but we've thrown forwards in like Rashford and Garnacho when we've been desperate. If they're good enough to play for United we'll see glimpses of something, a clean sheet isn't expected.
I think you're setting them up for failure, attackers get a much longer rope. A CB would need guiding through a game at that level for their debut. They'd be absolutely lost at sea.
I think there is no upside to play Evans and/or Casemiro. They're both finished as footballers, if a youth CB plays and has the same terrible game as them, at least in the medium and long, it could work towards his development.
I just don't think it's an experience conducive to development, if you actually care about their development.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,431
At this rate Tuchel doesn't look a bad idea, just make it a 2 year contract and not 3.
 

mythz

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
257
Ineos should sack him tonight.

Worst i have ever seen from Manchester United
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,688
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
Going to a back 3/ultra defensive and counter at this point is an absolute waste of time.

They do not have to get thrown into a dysfunctional side and I think you know that's not how anyone would expect these kids to make their debut. Mainoo and Garnacho have got their on merit, these guys are there because there's no one else.

I think you're setting them up for failure, attackers get a much longer rope. A CB would need guiding through a game at that level for their debut. They'd be absolutely lost at sea.

I just don't think it's an experience conducive to development, if you actually care about their development.
They're professional players, coddling them isn't going to do anything for them nor for us. If they're bad then no problem, they still have years to develop.
One game, albeit terrible will not determine their destiny. If they're good enough they will rise.
The alternative is using players who are 100% guaranteed of producing a shit game
 

NotChatGPT

Brownfinger
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
769
Play a young player with Evans and Casemiro and go 5 at the back is protects the injured and infirm and the young player too, in these games why try and be anything other than hard to beat we haven't won in god knows what we have injuries piling up like anything why stick with what hasn't been working and isn't working out of what your own stubborn ideology
Does it matter if "a young player" is ready or not, as it could have quite the detrimental effect on the fecker as well
 

Robertd0803

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
6,686
Well then we suffer playing out of form players out of position. The kids need to make a debut and will eventually HAVE to play in situations like this, otherwise why give them experience? Mainoo and Garnacho are doing it at only a year or two older.
Exactly. Why bother having reserve sides and youth sides if they cant be called upon in dire situations?

Obviously not an ideal way to make a debut but having an actual defender playing alongside a half fit Evans tonight would surely have been better than a woeful Casemiro being played out of position.

Just pull the trigger already, not sure the majority of us can take another 4 games of this let alone another bloody season.
 

frostbite

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2021
Messages
3,486
ETH had managed Onana before, and after a year here, he believed that with Onana we can challenge City.

ETH had managed Antony before and he thought he is Man Utd material, unstoppable, worth any price.

ETH had managed Amrabat before and he thought he is a much better option than Fred.

ETH knew Mount well, and he though he is the player we need in the middle, in order to challenge City.


I can think of two reasonable explanations for the above:

1. He has no clue. He doesn't even understand if his own players are good or bad. He watches these players everyday, for years, and he still has no clue. Amazing, but...

2. His manager gives him a cut from the transfers. (I really can't believe this. )

Do you have a better explanation?
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,994
Location
London
I got a warning for criticising the actions of the mods who were trying and failing to curb critisicism of ETH a few months ago. Just ask @Samid and the issues he had with his poll thread.The mod bias is why if you write "b@ld fraud" it comes out as Pep Gaurdiola is my idol. Turns out we were right and they were wrong and they can't stop fan opinion on the site turning against him.
Mods are usually extremely pro manager (I think Raoul was the only one who had a healthy dose of skepticism). But EtH has been so awful that even most of the mods have turned against him.
 

TsuWave

Full Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
14,531
I'm hoping that our fans learn a lesson from this and don't just blindly buy into the "back the manager" tripe full-throttle ever again
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,735
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
They're professional players, coddling them isn't going to do anything for them nor for us. If they're bad then no problem, they still have years to develop.
One game, albeit terrible will not determine their destiny. If they're good enough they will rise.
The alternative is using players who are 100% guaranteed of producing a shit game
Hardly though, I don't think either of them have made 10 apps for the u21s yet - happy to be corrected on that. I get because they're shit, we want anyone else, but playing either of those guys would not have been the answer..Imagine against fecking Mateta :lol: .
 

Gavinb33

Full Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
2,931
Location
Watching the TV or is it watching me
Going to a back 3/ultra defensive and counter at this point is an absolute waste of time.

They do not have to get thrown into a dysfunctional side and I think you know that's not how anyone would expect these kids to make their debut. Mainoo and Garnacho have got their on merit, these guys are there because there's no one else.

I think you're setting them up for failure, attackers get a much longer rope. A CB would need guiding through a game at that level for their debut. They'd be absolutely lost at sea.

I just don't think it's an experience conducive to development, if you actually care about their development.
Only if you think it wouldn't work to a degree, arguably to have a chance in the cup final we'd need to carry an iota of form into it, as it stands we're looking at going into it on the back of what 4 or 5 losses in a row and then we are up against Man City yeah that's not a good look for us
 

Fallon d'Floor

Full Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2024
Messages
461
7 of the starting XI were ten Hag signings.

2 of them were players he promoted.

He's now lost 30 games as United manager.

That's 27.27% of the 110 games he's overseen. Solskjaer, Mourinho and LvG all had a better numbers.
 

christy87

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
7,186
Location
Chelsea manager soccermanager
Supports
Dipping tea in toast
I'm hoping that our fans learn a lesson from this and don't just blindly buy into the "back the manager" tripe full-throttle ever again
Scrolling through Facebook groups it appears that way, they buy the give him time look at arteta, without understanding arteta was inexperienced when he took over the job and Arsenal management knew that.
 

Yagami

Good post resistant
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
13,722
Probably the most annoying thing out of this period is I got banned several times just for being negative about the guy, just to be proven absolutely right about him later on. No one will get me these needless warning points back.

Not like I want to post on RedCafe again after the way I was treated here but it's funny how out of all our post Ferguson coach, I got banned for being negative about the worst of them all.

Oh well, just wanted to say that, which will probably be the last time I ever post here.
I hope you change your mind.

I know what you mean, though. Back during ten Hag's first transfer window, I was very critical of how we were spending our money. Well, I got a tonne of abuse and insults thrown my way, as well as warning points for "being too negative", only for everyone to end up saying exactly what I was back then.

I was so tired of the insults I took a break from the forum. I came back after the 7-0 - not to say i told you so like some claimed - but because I was in disbelief and wanted to see how the forum was taking it. I'm glad I came back because, despite how rude some people get when you go against the grain, it is a good place to talk football and Manchester United. I'm just saying this because it'd be a shame to lose a poster over something like this. One comment can make a difference. It did for me when @Cascarino spoke up. I believe @Idxomer later did, too.
 

Baxquux

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2022
Messages
1,279
Let's just recall the fanbase wanted ETH. Now they don't. It might be worth considering the fanbase don't have a fekkin clue. Of course the Glazers hired and fired the managers to humour the fans. They knew it would make no difference because the problems lay elsewhere. Specifically it lay with them giving the keys to the club to accountants and marketing managers. Ultimately that culminated in resigning Ronaldo,the ultimate anti-football decision. Such extraordinarily bad stewardship won't be reversed overnight.
It was a reasonable gamble. A couple of analysts raised questions. Most of the 'professional pundits', even the hipster ones, thought it was a decent choice. Through luck, and having a midfield which was one year younger and less burned out than it is now (plus Fred for energy, etc), and more pragmatic play, Rashford hitting a streak, we did Ok, albeit with a few sticky moments, until after the League cup final. Following that, with Casemiro struggling to make it back to form after suspension/niggles, you could see things starting to decline. Choices he's made in terms of revising style and recruitment have turned this season, by and large, into a 'cluster,' and he doesn't seem to be adaptable.

If anything, the longer he's been in PL, the worse his judgement seems to have become. Before joining, when giving interviews following the announcement he called attention to the slight issues Pep initially had at City (in terms of physical profiles x style in the PL) - the choices he's made over the last year are basically counter to that judgement. It's bizarre - almost like a mental breakdown. But there's no contradiction between having supported him for manager over Poch and calling for him to leave now following a consistent pattern of poor choices, utter lack of adaptability and the rest.
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,688
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
Hardly though, I don't think either of them have made 10 apps for the u21s yet - happy to be corrected on that. I get because they're shit, we want anyone else, but playing either of those guys would not have been the answer..Imagine against fecking Mateta :lol: .
Never said they'd be the answer right now obviously. I precised if they played just like Casemiro did today, I wouldn't be disappointed at them. It would showed me something, I'd have learned something.
There is no upside to playing Casemiro as a CB, none whatsoever
 

leontas

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
1,177
ETH had managed Onana before, and after a year here, he believed that with Onana we can challenge City.

ETH had managed Antony before and he thought he is Man Utd material, unstoppable, worth any price.

ETH had managed Amrabat before and he thought he is a much better option than Fred.

ETH knew Mount well, and he though he is the player we need in the middle, in order to challenge City.


I can think of two reasonable explanations for the above:

1. He has no clue. He doesn't even understand if his own players are good or bad. He watches these players everyday, for years, and he still has no clue. Amazing, but...

2. His manager gives him a cut from the transfers. (I really can't believe this. )

Do you have a better explanation?
At this point I’m pretty sure he got a cut from some of these transfers and used us to deepen his pockets further. I can’t explain it otherwise. He can’t possibly be THAT clueless.
 

city-puma

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
3,364
Location
NYC
Hardly though, I don't think either of them have made 10 apps for the u21s yet - happy to be corrected on that. I get because they're shit, we want anyone else, but playing either of those guys would not have been the answer..Imagine against fecking Mateta :lol: .
Mateta is a very good player. I would love to have him in the team.