finneh
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 7,319
Well I'll only finish saying instead of City a different club would perpetually get Champions League football, the only difference is that they wouldn't be nearly as good as City and so the competition as a whole would be worse. The financial boost and exposure involved in Champions League football means that a club will gamble to get in it (not just a random well run club, a club that takes a big financial gamble) and once there will rarely ever get knocked off. The top 4 would have become a league within a league without relegation or promotion. Instead we have 6 clubs fighting for Champions League football instead of the same 4 every single season ad in my opinion that only makes the league better and more exciting.
We've lost Nasri to City, just like Benzema to Madrid and Sanchez to Barcelona. You move on, that's Football. Cole went to Chelsea because Arsenal couldn't match the wages he wanted, if Chelsea weren't there the chances are United or Madrid or AC or Inter or Barcelona would have offered him more wages than Arsenal and signed him. Arsenal are never going to keep hold of a salary incentivised footballer, it's the same reason Nasri left.
We've lost Nasri to City, just like Benzema to Madrid and Sanchez to Barcelona. You move on, that's Football. Cole went to Chelsea because Arsenal couldn't match the wages he wanted, if Chelsea weren't there the chances are United or Madrid or AC or Inter or Barcelona would have offered him more wages than Arsenal and signed him. Arsenal are never going to keep hold of a salary incentivised footballer, it's the same reason Nasri left.