Also, the whole notion about value that is being discussed here is an extremely potent case against capitalism and even markets as a way of organising society. One consequence of assigning value this way is, of course, the difficulty of dealing with pollution, and even more, the impossibility of dealing with the long-term effects of pollution (climate change).*
On a more mundane level, the acceptance of marginal value as the only measure of value means that you accept paying Lingard 100,000 pounds every week, while about 1.6bn people lack adequate shelter, as an optimal distribution of society's resources. It means that actions like taking care of a dying relative are literally worthless. It means that a company figures out the correct proportion of fat and flavour to make their fast food addictive, is more valuable to society by many orders of magnitude than building a garden and jogging path.
*The libertarian answer to this is to literally privatise air and charge for breathing and/or polluting it.