That’s what I thought. Or even a 4-1-4-1 In a way.But we're not playing 4231 we're playing 433 today with Lingard playing much deeper than usual in the 8 role.
Oh I fecked up the title.. 4-2-3-1 obviously!so which one...?
4-3-2-1 is your title but 4-2-3-1 is what you are complaining about. Which is which?For the love of god can bin that 4-2-3-1? Becoming almost like LVGs 5-3-2 for me, can't stand it.
This. Anyone thinking of this as 4-2-3-1 isn't looking at where the players are.But we're not playing 4231 we're playing 433 today with Lingard playing much deeper than usual in the 8 role.
Formation isn't the problem
Last week we gave Stoke too many chances as well in the first half, we just wide open with Pogba as part of midfield two and no amount of Lingard running around is going to change that.Same formation as last week. Nowt really wrong with the system
Yep, the problem is Lingard isn't suited to that role defensively or offensively, he does his best work close to goal with quick moves off the striker, he doesn't have the defensive nous or passing ability to be as deep as he's being asked to operate.But we're not playing 4231 we're playing 433 today with Lingard playing much deeper than usual in the 8 role.
I knowOh I fecked up the title.. 4-2-3-1 obviously!
You say 4-3-2-1 in the thread title, but go on about 4-2-3-1 in the OP, but we aren’t playing with any of them today.For the love of god can bin that 4-2-3-1? Becoming almost like LVGs 5-3-2 for me, can't stand it.
Thank you! It really hurts my eyes him trying to be that he's simply not.Yep, the problem is Lingard isn't suited to that role defensively or offensively, he does his best work close to goal with quick moves off the striker, he doesn't have the defensive nous or passing ability to be as deep as he's being asked to operate.
Yeah I feel the same just wondered why everyone is complaining about 4231 when we're not even playing itYep, the problem is Lingard isn't suited to that role defensively or offensively, he does his best work close to goal with quick moves off the striker, he doesn't have the defensive nous or passing ability to be as deep as he's being asked to operate.
Just OP being blind.This is a 4231? Really?
Aye, the problem is square pegs in round holes, not the formation.Yeah I feel the same just wondered why everyone is complaining about 4231 when we're not even playing it
The formation is not the issue at all. It's our game plan to not pressure opponents early enough by pressing and allowing them comfortable possession. Our opponents just don't lose the ball enough in dangerous areas enough. We seeming always have to go 60 plus yards to attack. We don't pass the ball well enough to not pressure opponents earlier.For the love of god can bin that 4-2-3-1? Becoming almost like LVGs 5-3-2 for me, can't stand it.
We just played with 3 in the middleMust play 3 in the middle with Pogba in the team!
It's so fecking obvious, what is it with us and the 2 man mid?
Let it go.
We did at the end of the game.We just played with 3 in the middle
Lingard started in the #8 positionWe did at the end of the game.
But I'm talking about 2 proper CMs with Pogba. At all times.
After Fellaini came on, and the difference was noticeable. Lingard might have started with intention to play in midfield 3 but he was all over the place and finding himself very far up the pitch. More like 4-1-4-1 as people mentioned whatever that was we need 3 proper CMs on the pitch at all times.We just played with 3 in the middle
But he isn't a proper CM, hence my post.Lingard started in the #8 position
Proper is the key word.Lingard started in the #8 position
Exactly.But he isn't a proper CM, hence my post.
He's an AM.
Pogba has to have 2 proper CMs next to him, otherwise our shape inevitably goes to shit as we come under pressure.
We played two different formations before and after Fellaini came on.After Fellaini came on, and the difference was noticeable. Lingard might have started with intention to play in midfield 3 but he was all over the place and finding himself very far up the pitch. More like 4-1-4-1 as people mentioned whatever that was we need 3 proper CMs on the pitch at all times.
past two games he wasn't all that, his form fluctuates greatly, and before he adds the consistency I have no problems with him being on and off. As Conte said earlier this week he's not at Chelsea to keep players happy, at Manchester United winning is top priority - we should become Arsenal if we fear to hurt someone's feelings at a cost of winning.In order to play a 4-3-3 with 3 proper central midfielders we'd have to drop Lingard who on current form is our best player. It won't happen.
Today he wasn't very good but his form over the past month has been brilliant. He deserves to keep his place even after one bad game.past two games he wasn't all that, his form fluctuates greatly, and before he adds the consistency I have no problems with him being on and off.
And when exactly that did us any good?But I'm talking about 2 proper CMs with Pogba. At all times.
Not sure why Lingard can't play in the role when he's been playing in that role pretty well against Arsenal & Stoke. Burnley away was never easy game.But he isn't a proper CM, hence my post.
He's an AM.
Pogba has to have 2 proper CMs next to him, otherwise our shape inevitably goes to shit as we come under pressure.
Everton? Even today once Fellaini came on we could break forward freely and had many opportunities to finish the game off, while before 70th minute we were literally hanging on.And when exactly that did us any good?