Television Aaron Sorkin's The Newsroom on HBO

Lastwolf

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
6,737
Location
Brick Sofa
I liked it enough to give it a few episodes, If it's just going to follow news stories from a year ago it's gonna get old quick.
 

JakeC

Last Man Standing 2 champion 2020/21
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
29,766
Shit, will the first episode be on again?
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,606
Even HBO would be very disappointed with the Daily Show's or Colbert's numbers with a series like this. They have about 1.5-1.2 million viewers per night.
And that is a predominantly liberal crowd.
What kind of ratings does Real Time get? Because I'd imagine they'd both attract the same crowd (even though I've only ever seen snippets of Bill Maher's show).
 

LARulz

Full Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
18,224
HBO announced its been renewed for a second season
 

Brophs

The One and Only
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
50,565
I really don't think Emily Mortimer works in this. I can only hope she grows into it.
 

Brophs

The One and Only
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
50,565
Having watched the rest of the episode it didn't get all that much better. Emily Mortimer is utterly awful - the amount of overacting was enough to make my toes curl, and we're supposed to believe these wild swings between kooky gobshite and hard nosed executive producer - and some of the supporting cast seem a bit weak. Sorkin is usually preachy but this is much less endearing. It can feel quite samey. Jeff Daniels is fantastic, though.
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,989
Location
Editing my own posts.
It isn't cast very well. Daniels (who I mistakenly called Bridges earlier) aside. I think everyone is a bit too young. It seems to have been cast by the kind of people that cast OC type nonsense, and all that other stuff that sprung up in the wake of Dawsons Creek. Grizzled veteran war corespondent you say? Well lets hire a petite, attractive girl in her late 30s. I mean, no one wants to see John Simpson in a wig, but there's some middle ground.
 

Leg-End

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
19,582
Daniels is owning it but I agree the support cast could have been much stronger. I don't really like Mortimer's acting in anything and this isn't doing anything to change my mind. We also appear to now have a token black guy who gets to make little quips, the usual love triangle story, the eccentric old mentor and the eye candy reporter, its all a bit paint by numbers.

That said I actually liked the first two episodes, thats not a huge revelation being a Sorkin fan but its got potential to grow into something great over a season or two.
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,194
Location
Interweb
Watched the second episode. Must say the first third of the episode was un-watchable for me, very cringeworthy. Casting has indeed been horrible. I groan everytime the Ellen Page look alike comes on the screen. The news segment part was good though. Daniels is carrying this so far IMO.
 

Lastwolf

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
6,737
Location
Brick Sofa
What kind of ratings does Real Time get? Because I'd imagine they'd both attract the same crowd (even though I've only ever seen snippets of Bill Maher's show).

4.1 Million on average.

There's potential in this show, I didn't much care for the relationship drama at the start but it seems to get better round the actual new parts.
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,989
Location
Editing my own posts.
I groan everytime the Ellen Page look alike comes on the screen.
Allergically inflamed Ellen Page is a confusingly annoying character. She's supposed to be playing flustered naive newbie 101, but then she launches into high brow Sorkin monologues at the drop of a hat, which sort of undermines the point of her character. Everyone talks like Sorkin in Sorkin stuff, but if that isn't necessarily a good thing.

Also her face is stupid.
 

Leg-End

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
19,582
She also portrayed the worst parody of a drunk I have seen in some time.
 

hungrywing

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
10,225
Location
Your Left Ventricle
Daniels is owning it but I agree the support cast could have been much stronger. I don't really like Mortimer's acting in anything and this isn't doing anything to change my mind. We also appear to now have a token black guy who gets to make little quips, the usual love triangle story, the eccentric old mentor and the eye candy reporter, its all a bit paint by numbers.

That said I actually liked the first two episodes, thats not a huge revelation being a Sorkin fan but its got potential to grow into something great over a season or two.
I didn't get that decision at all. If you're going to go balls to the wall with a super-idealistic show about "doing the news the right way", then forge ahead and hire the "old cantankerous economist in the bow tie" (or whatever she said the alternative was) and use the writing to make him interesting. If anything, your viewers will recognize what you're doing and appreciate it even more. They'll root for you even more because of the "underdog" factor.

Heck, later in the season have him get into a showdown with another network's hottie-conomist and hold his own, maybe even winning her over to their side. Went off on a tangent there, but anyhow, it was a strange decision.
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,989
Location
Editing my own posts.
Then there's the 2 mid-twenties "producers" and the fact that everyone bar the network heads and Daniels seems to have been airlifted in from the Logan's Run universe.

I though Generation Y were apparently having trouble finding their baby boomer's equivalent jobs?....Not in Sorkinland.
 

Brophs

The One and Only
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
50,565
He's always been a bit self-fascinated, like a lot of writers.

I'm not convinced this is going to be one of his better pieces of work, though.
 

Leg-End

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
19,582
To be fair to him though its only been 2 episodes, his TV work has always been a grower or atleast has been for me. He could quite easily win us over this series or rectify its shortfalls next series, preferably by casting a grumpy old bastard or someone who hasn't just reached puberty.
 

Wittmann45

Full Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2006
Messages
6,814
Location
'Keep the flag flying Jimmy'
It took me a few episodes to get into SportsNight. I don't know if it was the quality of the first few episodes or that it was mostly because of the laugh track, but I'll give it a few more episodes before I really make a decision.
 

R.N7

Such tagline. Wow!
Joined
Dec 25, 2007
Messages
35,690
Location
Eating a meal, a succulent chinese meal
Supports
a wife, three kids and Eboue
Meh pilot, thought the dialogue was downright poor at times and I was shocked that there wasn't some sort of comedic punchline after Mortimer's preachy speech with the added sentimental music.
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,194
Location
Interweb
This episode was alright. Loved the boardroom scenes and especially Fonda in the end. Hated the office romance stories, seriously creditworthy stuff.
 

Brophs

The One and Only
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
50,565
Episode 3 was much better but Emily Mortimer is still doing my fecking head in. Does she always overact this much?
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,989
Location
Editing my own posts.
Yeah the 3rd one was much better than the 2nd. Though moon face is still annoying, and it's baffling why Squinty McSmug would be obsessed with her in an office improbably packed with young attractive intelligent women
 

Brophs

The One and Only
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
50,565
Apparently she has a beautiful mind for current affairs, which his weird squinty little eyes and squashed up face can see.
 

Will Absolute

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
7,982
Location
Southern Ireland
Every Sorkin show is a bit preachy, that's some of the charm of them.
Preachiness is only charming if you agree with the sermon. Otherwise it's irritating.

Personally I find all indoctrination in entertainment offensive. It's an insult to the intelligence of the viewer, and an violation of their right to make up their own minds about the world, without some self-important hooker-abusing cokehead trying to tell them what to think.

Not that I've seen as much as 5 minutes of Sorkin's work, of course. :)
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,194
Location
Interweb
Preachiness is only charming if you agree with the sermon. Otherwise it's irritating.

Personally I find all indoctrination in entertainment offensive. It's an insult to the intelligence of the viewer, and an violation of their right to make up their own minds about the world, without some self-important hooker-abusing cokehead trying to tell them what to think.

Not that I've seen as much as 5 minutes of Sorkin's work, of course. :)
I agree. can't stand the sermons and have never been a fan of Sorkin for that very reason.
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,194
Location
Interweb
Yeah the 3rd one was much better than the 2nd. Though moon face is still annoying, and it's baffling why Squinty McSmug would be obsessed with her in an office improbably packed with young attractive intelligent women
The whole office romantic comedy angle is pathetic and cringe-inducing.
 

cinc

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2006
Messages
9,656
Location
I’m looking for a sacrificial lamb
Preachiness is only charming if you agree with the sermon. Otherwise it's irritating.

Personally I find all indoctrination in entertainment offensive. It's an insult to the intelligence of the viewer, and an violation of their right to make up their own minds about the world, without some self-important hooker-abusing cokehead trying to tell them what to think.

Not that I've seen as much as 5 minutes of Sorkin's work, of course. :)
To be fair to Sorkin, his sermons are well crafted and quite balanced.
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,194
Location
Interweb
To be fair to Sorkin, his sermons are well crafted and quite balanced.
Non sense. In this very show, he is preaching that US was much better in previous decades. In a recent interview he said best period for US was 40s. Yeah, a period when blacks were treated like slaves and had no rights. Women were not given equal rights as well. Let alone any talk of homosexuals.
 

Wonder Pigeon

'Shelbourne FC Supporter'
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
21,638
Location
Forza Shelbourne
Supports
Shelbourne
I'd like Sorkin's work a lot better if he was able to write different voices for characters and if every character didn't act like every word they uttered was the most important thing anyone has ever said.
 

FCBarca

Mes que un Rag
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
14,246
Location
La Côte, Suisse
Supports
Peace
Yeah, I'm a bit letdown from my initial excitement from the series...It's actually pretty condescending and the way the women are written is unbearably sexist

Great ideas don't always translate to success and Sorkin hasn't managed to do anything creative with it...Shame
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,989
Location
Editing my own posts.
I'd actually prefer it to be more preachy. The best bits are when someone's in full on preach mode, like the boardroom scenes in this, or anything with Daniels. It's the other shit that lets it down, and the endless uninteresting office romances (and considering everyone talks like Aaron Sorkin, it just ends up looking like lots of Aaron Sorkins courting other Aaron Sorkins)

Initially I thought it was going to be a full on TV version of Network, but then after Daniels' initial rant (that was in the trailer anyway) nothing really happened. He's changed into a more competent newsman, yeah, sure, but not really in a very interesting way. The first episode pretty much dropped the whole "you had a rant at a college girl" thing pretty quickly, and it was almost instantly forgotten, and then went into a 40 minute show about an oil spill being well reported.
 

Brophs

The One and Only
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
50,565
Also, was there really a five month gap between the first couple of episodes and the third? One of them said at one stage that they'd been there five months. For such super-duper tv types, they didn't change all that much in five months.
 

FCBarca

Mes que un Rag
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
14,246
Location
La Côte, Suisse
Supports
Peace
Yeah, the Northwestern speech got me hooked but it may have peaked there and gone downhill ever since
 

Lastwolf

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
6,737
Location
Brick Sofa
I've noticed that TV shows in America tend to be a bit wierd in the first season, they tend to throw alot of shit in to see what sticks, often sticking rigidly to a format that doesn't lend itself to good storytelling to get renewed/fanbase.

I'm hoping the relationship drama is one of those threads, the main one between older justin bieber and blondie is fecking daft, she's a total wreck and her boyfriend is an asshole, but he's only interested in her because his boss told him he would be, what the feck?

Some serious inception shit happened to him in that pilot, she planted the idea that he would love her and then 10minutes later kapow, he's hooked for life.