Adrien Rabiot | signs 1 year deal at Juventus. See you all next year

Status
Not open for further replies.

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,071
Location
Canada
So, basically, we upgrade McTominay, give him the primary defensive duty and don't need Fred to be a DM.

That would indeed be an improvement.
Yeah he would be for me a 1 for 1 swap with McTominay. Physically they are similar in stature, can both run all day, except Rabiot is quite decent at a lot of DM stuff (or defensive box to box stuff). Fred would likely still be the deepest in terms of receiving the ball first, as Ten Hag likes to have a playmaker pick the ball up off the defenders. But his partner in Rabiot would be secure with the ball, a decent runner with it (not like McTominay trying a run and almost getting a red card), and good defensively unlike McTominay who is all over the place defensively.
 

V.O.

Last Man Standing finalist 2019/20
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
8,030
More of a reason to have a regular agent?
You can say having family as an agent in general is a bad idea - I wouldn't be against that. But I don't see what difference it makes to have his mum do the job instead of his dad (even if he was still alive).

I'm sure she's doing a better job than Harry Kane's brother, who looks like he sleeps in a racecar bed and had Harry commit his whole prime to Tottenham for relatively underwhelming wages.
 

MayfieldsFinest

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 3, 2021
Messages
189
Quality control
You can say having family as an agent in general is a bad idea - I wouldn't be against that. But I don't see what difference it makes to have his mum do the job instead of his dad (even if he was still alive).

I'm sure she's doing a better job than Harry Kane's brother, who looks like he sleeps in a racecar bed and had Harry commit his whole prime to Tottenham for relatively underwhelming wages.
His dad is/was man so would obviously do it better, that's why we are paid more in general. His mum will be too emotional. Pay gap schmay gap.



Before I get banned I am obviously joking.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,953
Location
W.Yorks
You can say having family as an agent in general is a bad idea - I wouldn't be against that. But I don't see what difference it makes to have his mum do the job instead of his dad (even if he was still alive).

I'm sure she's doing a better job than Harry Kane's brother, who looks like he sleeps in a racecar bed and had Harry commit his whole prime to Tottenham for relatively underwhelming wages.
Aye - any family member - dad, brother, mum, cousin-uncle - being your agent is a bit silly I think, especially if you're a top player.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,939
Location
France
Aye - any family member - dad, brother, mum, cousin-uncle - being your agent is a bit silly I think, especially if you're a top player.
It's probably true but many top players don't actually have agents and rely on a family member.
 

V.O.

Last Man Standing finalist 2019/20
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
8,030
Shit use of stats to compare defensive minded players
Yeah. Goals, assists, and chances created... for a role where your job is to screen the defence and safely progress the ball to the players who do create the chances.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,411
Shit use of stats to compare defensive minded players

Not really the key ones for me being passes and chances created, you can ignore the goals if you like.

Less passes and possessions won than Scotty McFingerbang sign him up!

He's not even a pure DM so the defensive stats shouldn't matter.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,071
Location
Canada
Yeah. Goals, assists, and chances created... for a role where your job is to screen the defence and safely progress the ball to the players who do create the chances.
Yeah like at least put per 90 stats. Or just do a quick copy and paste of stats from fbref and cherry pick from there. Its like the dumb stats people brought up to say Modrić wasn't a good player 10 years ago. "Doesn't score or assist goals" for a player whose job isn't about scoring goals or making assists.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,534
But I don't see what difference it makes to have his mum do the job instead of his dad (even if he was still alive).
It doesn't make any difference.

It's the family thing I'd be a bit skeptical about (if anything), not the gender of the family member.
 

Fridge chutney

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
8,961
Positionally he played pretty much 50/50 as a #6 and a #8 during his time at PSG. He has played a lot more as a #8 for Juve, but they play a very different system/style where his role there wouldn't translate directly to how he would be used under Ten Hag.
You look at his analytics, year after year, and his profile says:
  • little to no goal threat
  • unadventurous passing
  • Safe and high completion passing (90's percentile)
  • Strong defensive stats, very strong pressures, tackles, interceptions, etc (70's, 80's, 90's percentiles)
  • Strong ball carrying stats (this kind of fell last season at 60's percentile on average, but prior to last season was very strong, 80's percentile)
  • Most of his years he had more touches in deeper positions than in advanced positions (of the 5 seasons on FBRef, only in 2019/20 did he have fewer touches in his defensive third then in the midfield or attacking thirds)
  • Decent at not giving the ball away with miscontrols or being dispossessed, a very important attribute for a DM (but vastly improved on Pogba/Fred/McTominay who are all stupidly low ranking in this)
See for yourself:
https://fbref.com/en/players/8794e251/scout/11222/Adrien-Rabiot-Scouting-Report
Everything about his analytics profile says he's a defensive minded player. He's not a creator, he's not a ball progressor, but either he's a defensive #8, or just a #6 who can carry the ball well. Either way, fits a pretty obvious hole in our squad, both in terms of what he'd bring defensively, but also his ability to move with the ball and not get dispossessed or miscontrol the ball constantly.
Great analysis, thank you for that. I didn't know anything about him really. This could be a good signing.
 

city-puma

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
3,280
Location
NYC
I would like him to come purely because he would be an upgrade on McFred, but I want to club to hold firm and not keep giving out stupid wages even more.
Not sure an upgrade at all but it definitely offers alternative setups. We lack of physical presence in midfield.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,071
Location
Canada
Not really the key ones for me being passes and chances created, you can ignore the goals if you like.

Less passes and possessions won than Scotty McFingerbang sign him up!
Here you go if you want a better analysis of what he is as a player rather than the worst display of stats I've seen in my life.

Positionally he played pretty much 50/50 as a #6 and a #8 during his time at PSG. He has played a lot more as a #8 for Juve, but they play a very different system/style where his role there wouldn't translate directly to how he would be used under Ten Hag.
You look at his analytics, year after year, and his profile says:
  • little to no goal threat
  • unadventurous passing
  • Safe and high completion passing (90's percentile)
  • Strong defensive stats, very strong pressures, tackles, interceptions, etc (70's, 80's, 90's percentiles)
  • Strong ball carrying stats (this kind of fell last season at 60's percentile on average, but prior to last season was very strong, 80's percentile)
  • Most of his years he had more touches in deeper positions than in advanced positions (of the 5 seasons on FBRef, only in 2019/20 did he have fewer touches in his defensive third then in the midfield or attacking thirds)
  • Decent at not giving the ball away with miscontrols or being dispossessed, a very important attribute for a DM (but vastly improved on Pogba/Fred/McTominay who are all stupidly low ranking in this)
See for yourself:
https://fbref.com/en/players/8794e251/scout/11222/Adrien-Rabiot-Scouting-Report
Everything about his analytics profile says he's a defensive minded player. He's not a creator, he's not a ball progressor, but either he's a defensive #8, or just a #6 who can carry the ball well. Either way, fits a pretty obvious hole in our squad, both in terms of what he'd bring defensively, but also his ability to move with the ball and not get dispossessed or miscontrol the ball constantly.
 

gza the genius

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
5,108
Location
supply and command
If Rabiot comes in he will likely play a more defensive role, the role that Fred and Mctominay have shown over and over again that they are completely incapable of playing. The fact that he's comfortable in that role is already a big improvement even if you don't think he's more talented or whatever than McFred as it's very clear neither of them can play effectively deep in midfield.

Even if we don't get FDJ he will massively help stabilize the middle for us. He won't solve all of our problems in the midfield but I don't think that's the idea anyway, it sounds like we're signing him in addition to FDJ/SMS/whoever.
 

V.O.

Last Man Standing finalist 2019/20
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
8,030
It doesn't make any difference.

It's the family thing I'd be a bit skeptical about (if anything), not the gender of the family member.
Yeah, that's fair enough as I've said. Was about @antohan's post where he's said that fathers as agents are bad news half the time and mothers as agents are bad news all the time.
 

DJ_21

Evens winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
12,241
Location
Manchester
Can’t we sign tielemans for an extra 10m? Much rather him then rabiot.
 

V.O.

Last Man Standing finalist 2019/20
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
8,030
If Rabiot comes in he will likely play a more defensive role, the role that Fred and Mctominay have shown over and over again that they are completely incapable of playing. Even if we don't get FDJ he will massively help stabilize the middle for us. He won't solve all of our problems in the midfield but I don't think that's the idea anyway, it sounds like we're signing him in addition to FDJ/SMS/whoever.
That's the thing for me as well. Just having somebody who's actually capable of playing as the deepest midfielder, even if they're bang average, would be a huge difference to us.

Even if our midfield is then DM, Fred, Bruno/Eriksen, it's so much better than having either McT or Fred just in front of the defence, where both of them are an absolute bombscare.
 

DJ_21

Evens winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
12,241
Location
Manchester
If Rabiot comes in he will likely play a more defensive role, the role that Fred and Mctominay have shown over and over again that they are completely incapable of playing. The fact that he's comfortable in that role is already a big improvement even if you don't think he's more talented or whatever than McFred as it's very clear neither of them can play effectively deep in midfield.

Even if we don't get FDJ he will massively help stabilize the middle for us. He won't solve all of our problems in the midfield but I don't think that's the idea anyway, it sounds like we're signing him in addition to FDJ/SMS/whoever.
This makes sense. Plus if we’re only paying 15m for him then that’s not bad but only if it’s to have him aswell as another midfielder. Him on his own is nowhere near enough but him plus de Jong or SMS like you said wouldn’t be bad at all.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,071
Location
Canada
Absolutely world class pal
Hey just putting it out there, there are ways to shit on him as a player (he's not perfect and has a lot of weaknesses and wasn't good last season) without putting out a dumb graphic that says "hahaha look at this DM doesn't score or create, useless, let's laugh at mcfrediot".
 

Thiagoal

New Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
2,565
I see Rabiot very much a signing instead of FDJ. Stylistically they are very similar: can receive a pass with their back to play, keep possession, comfortable moving away from defenders, like dribbling through the centre of the pitch. I very much doubt we will sign both and expect this has picked up pace as we are very much expecting FDJ to stay at Barca or join someone else.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,411
That's the thing for me as well. Just having somebody who's actually capable of playing as the deepest midfielder, even if they're bang average, would be a huge difference to us.

Even if our midfield is then DM, Fred, Bruno/Eriksen, it's so much better than having either McT or Fred just in front of the defence, where both of them are an absolute bombscare.

We had Matic for the past 4 seasons and he's isn't bang average but playing alongside Pinky and Perky you're up against it.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,411
Hey just putting it out there, there are ways to shit on him as a player (he's not perfect and has a lot of weaknesses and wasn't good last season) without putting out a dumb graphic that says "hahaha look at this DM doesn't score or create, useless, let's laugh at mcfrediot".

It wasn't the best, most informative graphic for sure but it's a indication of what you're getting with Rabiot.

I think it's almost universally agreed that he's a pretty mediocre player, the Italian football expert on Sky (Forgot her name sorry) said it best when she claimed she didn't even know what he excelled at.

If a DM in the team is putting out less passes per 90 than Scott McTominay there's cause for concern. He doesn't even recover the ball back as much as Scott either.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
He played Eriksen upfront cos he's probably still getting used to the players at his disposal? Unless you expect him to play Eriksen upfront every game and continue with McFred because he did so in one game.
Yeah he played because Martial was injured and Ronaldo wasn’t match fit. Nothing to do with getting use to players
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,071
Location
Canada
It wasn't the best, most informative graphic for sure but it's a indication of what you're getting with Rabiot.

I think it's almost universally agreed that he's a pretty mediocre player, the Italian football expert on Sky (Forgot her name sorry) said it best when she claimed she didn't even know what he excelled at.

If a DM in the team is putting out less passes per 90 than Scott McTominay there's cause for concern. He doesn't even recover the ball back as much as Scott either.
That very same italian football expert on Sky (Mina Rzouki or something) claimed that she didn't see the point in Liverpool signing Salah and that he was basically Cuadrado with no end product. So.... yeah.

If you actually want to compare, then just check out their actual analytics. Ignore last season as we wouldn't be signing him for what he did last season, but anticipating him to return to what he was before that. Compare that to McTominay before last season since that was disaster for us as well.
  • Rabiot is 76th percentile for total passes completed, McTominay is 57th
  • Rabiot is 98th percentile for pass success, McTominay is 76th (Rabiot 54th when it comes to progressive passes, McTominay is 65th)
  • Rabiot in the 88th percentile for tackles, McTominay in the 44th percentile
  • Rabiot in the 90th percentile for dribblers tackled, McTominay in the 47th percentile
  • Rabiot in the 72nd percentile for successful pressures, McTominay in the 28th percentile
  • Rabiot 70th percentile for touches, McTominay 59th percentile
  • Rabiot in 60th and 55th percentile for being dispossessed and miscontrols, McTominay 17th and 29th percentile
  • Above point especially relevant when you consider that Rabiot carries the ball far more than McTominay (76th in progressive carries, 83rd for carries into the final 3rd, 79th for carries into the penalty area. McTominay is 67/66/64 for those, while giving it away constantly unlike Rabiot)
Rabiot is just a vastly superior footballer. He is secure on the ball, he is a good runner with it, he is good technically, he is actually good defensively instead of carrying the illusion of being useful defensively like McTominay who does a lot of nothing defensively.

Again, he wouldn't be the deep playmaker. He would keep things safe, he wouldn't give it away stupidly, pointless, constantly (what Fred and McTominay repeatedly did on the weekend and the last few years). That's what we need out of the defensive partner to the deep playmaker. Of course, we also need the deep playmaker, hence the pursuit for Frenkie. But even if it's Fred next to Rabiot, it's still a massive improvement. Or Eriksen next to Rabiot. Massive improvement. At this point... just be happy we are signing a midfielder whose best qualities are to do with defending and not giving it away constantly.

Also to add - if you look at his time at PSG when he actually played as the DM and not just a defensive #8, his passing stats were excellent. 90's for progressive passes, total passes, etc. Analytics wise looks like a world class DM according to his PSG time as a DM, but of course it's an easier league, more dominant team, different role/system. But he has shown a high level playing deep before, and at Juve showed still good defensive numbers, but just stopped being progressive with his passing (again, might be system though). He's a player who has shown a high level in things we lack at 2 clubs in 2 leagues. One way or another, he's a massive upgrade on McTominay.
 
Last edited:

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,071
Location
Canada
When people start throwing stats for midfielders, Modric comes to my mind. His goals and assists are worse than many average midfielders have.
Yep. People used to always bring up goals and assists for Modric 10 years ago when they tried to argue he wasn't very good. Idiotic at the time even when analytics weren't a thing in football.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,411
That very same italian football expert on Sky (Mina Rzouki or something) claimed that she didn't see the point in Liverpool signing Salah and that he was basically Cuadrado with no end product. So.... yeah.

If you actually want to compare, then just check out their actual analytics. Ignore last season as we wouldn't be signing him for what he did last season, but anticipating him to return to what he was before that. Compare that to McTominay before last season since that was disaster for us as well.
  • Rabiot is 76th percentile for total passes completed, McTominay is 57th
  • Rabiot is 98th percentile for pass success, McTominay is 76th (Rabiot 54th when it comes to progressive passes, McTominay is 65th)
  • Rabiot in the 88th percentile for tackles, McTominay in the 44th percentile
  • Rabiot in the 90th percentile for dribblers tackled, McTominay in the 47th percentile
  • Rabiot in the 72nd percentile for successful pressures, McTominay in the 28th percentile
  • Rabiot 70th percentile for touches, McTominay 59th percentile
  • Rabiot in 60th and 55th percentile for being dispossessed and miscontrols, McTominay 17th and 29th percentile
  • Above point especially relevant when you consider that Rabiot carries the ball far more than McTominay (76th in progressive carries, 83rd for carries into the final 3rd, 79th for carries into the penalty area. McTominay is 67/66/64 for those, while giving it away constantly unlike Rabiot)
Rabiot is just a vastly superior footballer. He is secure on the ball, he is a good runner with it, he is good technically, he is actually good defensively instead of carrying the illusion of being useful defensively like McTominay who does a lot of nothing defensively.

Again, he wouldn't be the deep playmaker. He would keep things safe, he wouldn't give it away stupidly, pointless, constantly (what Fred and McTominay repeatedly did on the weekend and the last few years). That's what we need out of the defensive partner to the deep playmaker. Of course, we also need the deep playmaker, hence the pursuit for Frenkie. But even if it's Fred next to Rabiot, it's still a massive improvement. Or Eriksen next to Rabiot. Massive improvement. At this point... just be happy we are signing a midfielder whose best qualities are to do with defending and not giving it away constantly.

Good post, fair enough I'll take your point.

It just seems like a mess doesn't it and that's more from the clubs side than Rabiot's I suppose.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,071
Location
Canada
Good post, fair enough I'll take your point.

It just seems like a mess doesn't it and that's more from the clubs side than Rabiot's I suppose.
Oh that is for sure. But that seems to be the case with every signing we go for. Even Eriksen was a free transfer, and we couldn't get it done until after our pre season tour. And as others have said, there are other issues like his mother causing some issues (apparently Rabiot himself hasn't caused issues really), and last season just not being a good one. But he's 27, so no reason to think it isn't a one off in a struggling team. Wages of course he might be asking for way too much, but I think we really should be able to convince him to come without too much trouble, so that's on the negotiating team failing time after time.

At this point though, I'm just so tired of us ignoring the defensive role in our midfield year after year that I'll be happy with him and just want it to get done asap so we can integrate him asap and stop wasting time. Should've been done months ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.