and I can't really remember when was the last time a world class fullback got taken to the cleaners but in this draft its kinda customary to assume that a world class winger will be destroying his opposite number with no solution available to the defence which I find weird.
good positioning can neutralize most threats.
Normal when Matthews is arguably the best ever at beating his full back. That was how he made his name, skinning his full backs, cutting in/crossing. Whether you were one of the worlds best ever in Nilton Santos didn't matter much.
If he didn't have a bad game then he'd be guaranteed to beat your full back more than a few times. The question is whether it will lead to goals or not, which very likely it would considering how great he was.
He created all four goals for England against Brazil with Santos against him who almost always had sufficient help and Matthews rarely had his full back overlapping to create the successful chance.
Two times FWA player of the year, Ballon d'Or winner and was capable of absolutely dominating matches like in the "Matthews final" where he created goal after goal in one of the best FA Cup performances ever. Lead to a hattrick by Mortensen too.
Then there is Best on the other side, who is even better. With the relatively weak full backs available in this draft comparison to the very best ever it was bound to be a draft where wingers would be relatively strong in comparison to their full backs.
Where even if I have Blanchflower in the midfield, I am facing Scholes here. The relative advantage is far from as big between their peaks as Best VS Cohen and Matthews VS Gemmell.