16
He made some good runs when they had the ball on the opposite flank or in middle, got ignored, and then had to come back onside each time, so unsure we're you got that from.
He's a WUM, can't be objective about United, should see the state of his comments in PL game week threads.
Thought it was ridiculous. This would explain why. Cheers.
Not saying he is a poor player...saying it genuinely looked like he didn’t want use Amad...he seemed to go out of his way not to use the width and to drive infield...that wasn’t Amad’s fault. Maybe trust just needs to be built but it was noticeable in both games.Big ask for Amad to step into an away firm Derby, but he wilted massively.
Hopefully be a learning experience for him.
Looked positionally weak, barely wanted the ball and seemed overwhelmed by the whole occasion, which is to be expected. It can't be easy to step into a game of that magnitude.
And for those saying the Rangers RB is poor, you are wrong, he is a very good RB and has been for a number of years now, and that pains me to say it.
Definitely the latter but big shout out to the former too.
I don't think Amad showed enough willing to get the ball off him to be fair.
Yes taking him off was the reason it finished 3-0 , what an statement
It wasn’t really , look at his performance clip v Ross County ya he played well but feck ,Ross County?Last week he was the second fecking coming of Christ, this week he won’t make it and is a waste of 20m.
Our fans are so reactive.
The RB did the same thing in Amad's debut too. Slowed the transition down or any counter-attacks.
I think it's generally hard to tell how good a winger's movement is on TV because you don't see it when the defenders have the ball a good chunk of the time.
stand corrected. I just wanted to say 'power' and 'ranger'. Silly me.
Maybe because this is his performance thread?
Didn't watch the game, but from this video when he did have the ball he didn't look to bad, just very few actual touches. As least looked strong on the ball.
Mm he wasn't that dominant for Celtic performance or stats wise. Henrik Larsson was a man in a boy's league.
I think the biggest benefits are:
What do you mean away from home?
Hard to believe those people watched the game...if they did they would have also watched the entire Rangers team - who have played together for years and have ample old firm experience - play equally terribly. Turn on the new guy I guess. What a stupid over reaction to 45 minutes of football.
Not to mention Edouard was 5 years older than Amad when he actually ended up leaving.
What do *you* mean, 'What do you mean away from home?'
Well going by this season, we can teach that lesson at home itself, HA!
Granted I have only seen the Ross County and the Celtic game but he was one of the worst players on the pitch in both games. So slow and clunky, makes AWB look like prime Roberto Baggio on the ball.And for those saying the Rangers RB is poor, you are wrong, he is a very good RB and has been for a number of years now, and that pains me to say it.
They DID pay equally terribly, but you don't get to hide individual terribleness behind team terribleness. Each individual apart from Ryan Jack when he came on was terrible. They should all be slated individually. Except the only person relevant for Man Utd and their fans is Diallo, so he should be individually criticised.
That Sakala kid who I think is the other option looks pretty crap. Unless one of the CMs goes out wide I think they'll have to persevere. As they should of course - they don't play Celtic every day.
