Ballon d'Or 2023 | Messi wins for 8th time

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,985
Messi I presume, for the World Cup win and as a perfect last hurrah moment for one of the game's greatest players ever.

Would be epic (being Norwegian) if it was Haaland though.
 

Gehrman

Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
11,195
It's a given
Haaland? I dunno. Bookies favour Messi, but as far as a striker goes Haaland had a near perfect season. Also i think there is Messi fatigue with him winning it.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,457
Messi showed up in the most important final he has ever played, Haaland didn't in any of the finals he played.

Messi should take it.
 

Plastic Evra

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2023
Messages
1,865
I'd rather Haaland, Messi could do with not buying another IKEA cabinet for yet another Bd'O.
Enough with the Old Guard already.
 

Dannn411

Full Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2022
Messages
2,499
Haaland has been the best player on the planet over the last 12 months which is what the award should be based on. Not a 4-weeks tournament even though that tournament is the biggest around. The Golden Ball has been awarded to recognize achievement in that tournament.
 

RedStarUnited

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
8,153
I personally would hope Rodri is atleast in the top 3. He has been sensation for the last 12 months.
 

altodevil

Odds winner of 'Odds or Evens 2023/2024'
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Messages
17,598
Manchester United forum advocating for a City player to win the Ballon d'Or. Jesus wept.
 

Gehrman

Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
11,195
Manchester United forum advocating for a City player to win the Ballon d'Or. Jesus wept.
Damn straight. We should be campaigning for the most sublime goat of goats.
 

KeanoMagicHat

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2019
Messages
4,095
Almost feels a bit wrong Messi getting it for achievements that are almost a year old but if you're to judge it historically, he had arguably a top 3 World Cup in history and any player in history that was eligible that had as good a World Cup as he did would 100% get the award.

Haaland will probably be second then and third will be between De Bruyne and Mbappé for the same reasons - CL vs a distant memory World Cup.
 

In Rainbows

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
6,767
It's not only the World Cup, but Messi also had a really good season with PSG in terms of end product. It's just that it shows itself up in the form of goals and assists, not just goals. I think it's because Messi's domestic season wasn't as good as it was in his prime, but for any normal player it would be their best season ever. Granted there was like a small period where Messi wasn't performing well for PSG.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,818
Manchester United forum advocating for a City player to win the Ballon d'Or. Jesus wept.
And hoping one of their players finish top 3, what a sad state of affairs. Bluecafe strikes again.
 

Gio

★★★★★★★★
Joined
Jan 25, 2001
Messages
20,349
Location
Bonnie Scotland
Supports
Rangers
Almost feels a bit wrong Messi getting it for achievements that are almost a year old but if you're to judge it historically, he had arguably a top 3 World Cup in history and any player in history that was eligible that had as good a World Cup as he did would 100% get the award.

Haaland will probably be second then and third will be between De Bruyne and Mbappé for the same reasons - CL vs a distant memory World Cup.
He had an impactful tournament and a fitting culimination for his international career, but I really wouldn't rank Messi's performances in 2022 anywhere near a top 3 of all time at the World Cup.
 

Remember the geese

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
7,169
Location
Northampton
Haaland is a brilliant goalscorer, but a very average footballer. I'd prefer the winner of this award to be someone who is both an impactful player and a brilliant footballer.
 

Care_de_Bobo

Full Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
2,375
Haaland has been the best player on the planet over the last 12 months which is what the award should be based on. Not a 4-weeks tournament even though that tournament is the biggest around. The Golden Ball has been awarded to recognize achievement in that tournament.
Except that Haaland was anonymous at the business end of the season. Gundogan, Rodri, De Bruyne and Dias were more important players for City's success than Haaland in the end if we're being honest. Performances in the biggest games is part of being one of the greatest, M'bappe and Messi showed up big time in the World Cup and were plenty productive aside from that.

People will remember Messi's and M'bappe's performances at the World Cup for years, nobody will remember Haaland stat padding against Forest, Burnley, Leipzig or Palace.

I don't remember many advocating for Van Nistelrooy to win the Balon d'Or ahead of the likes of Zidane or Nedved, because the highest goalscorer isn't always the best player. City scored the same amount of goals the season before Haaland joined and had more points in the league so it's not like he made some massive difference to them.
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,985
It's not only the World Cup, but Messi also had a really good season with PSG in terms of end product. It's just that it shows itself up in the form of goals and assists, not just goals. I think it's because Messi's domestic season wasn't as good as it was in his prime, but for any normal player it would be their best season ever. Granted there was like a small period where Messi wasn't performing well for PSG.
Yeah, but that was in the fifth best league in Europe. If he gets it, it's the world cup that does it.
 

In Rainbows

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
6,767
Yeah, but that was in the fifth best league in Europe. If he gets it, it's the world cup that does it.
The World Cup puts him over the top and it's the main argument. But it's important to put into context that he just didn't perform well over that month and that was that.
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,178
He had an impactful tournament and a fitting culimination for his international career, but I really wouldn't rank Messi's performances in 2022 anywhere near a top 3 of all time at the World Cup.
I don't think it's that outlandish to suggest it.

You could argue it. If not top 3, I think top 5 is fairly appropriate. Hard to think of 5 WC campaigns that were clearly better.
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,178
Messi should win it.

Modric won it in 2018 and his WC + club season wasn't as good as Messi's.

Messi's club season was actually very good. For Messi standards, he's had much better. For normal standards, it'd be a career year for a majority of attackers.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,888
Can't look past Messi. He rolled back the years in the World Cup and produced a monster of a tournament.

Football is about more than just goal tallies and stats.

Emotions and narratives are what drew many of us to become addicted to the game at some point, and there is no narrative more compelling than Messi signing off his career winning the world cup that always eluded him. I think most people will be thinking along these lines as well.
 

Zen

Full Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
14,555
I mean on the basis of 98, 02, 06, and 18. It should be Messi, and if he didn't have 7 already, there would be no moaning.

It's only his and Ronaldo's fault they the system of rewarding it for the World Cup, more or less on it's own was broken. So it's only fitting one of them gets it for doing what they broke by ludicriously brilliant and consistent. If any other nation had won, Haaland was that brilliant and almost as consistent enough to pull it off too.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,057
Location
Moscow
Almost feels a bit wrong Messi getting it for achievements that are almost a year old but if you're to judge it historically, he had arguably a top 3 World Cup in history and any player in history that was eligible that had as good a World Cup as he did would 100% get the award.

Haaland will probably be second then and third will be between De Bruyne and Mbappé for the same reasons - CL vs a distant memory World Cup.
That’s not even remotely close to the truth.
 

Gehrman

Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
11,195
How often are the bookies correct on this?
 

NotoriousISSY

$10mil and I fecked it up!
Joined
Mar 20, 2012
Messages
16,299
Location
up north
My immediate thought was Messi because of the world cup, but logically the player who stood out most to me over the last 12 months has to be Rodri.

Like De Bruyne, I think he's taken the role he plays to a new level and has some of the best attributes of predecessors rolled into one. He's got that Alonso/Carrick passing range. He's got a top quality goal out of nothing in him. His speed of thought is up there with the best I've seen in that position. And he's not afraid to take one for the team and just completely haul someone down.

It's just a shame he plays for City because then I wouldn't absolutely hate it.

If Haaland wins it's understandable, it's been a numbers game for years. It's weird to say he never really felt outstanding, but he is of course currently the absolute best at putting the ball in the net which is the aim of the game and ultimately his goals helped City achieve a treble, even if they weren't considered definitive goals. So if he wins, it's perfectly justified.