Reapersoul20
Can Anderson score? No.
I mean we are effectively in agreement then. I just don't agree with these complete and total gowls who refuse to hear any kind of a theory against the prevailing wind.If that is a true representation of the evidence I'd have convicted. So it is inevitable that there is going to be a backlash when Paddy Jackson is given a leadership role even though he wasn't convicted. And backlashes tend to be quite vociferous. So while I wouldn't advocate calling him a rapist on social media I don't have any sympathy for him either.
The kind of complete and total arrogant liudramáns who posts things like "don't even bother" or "thank god the feminist movement has people like you" - things which add absolutely nothing to the discussion and just completely show their lack of understanding of the case and the wider implications of it.
They rugby players are probably scrotes. Fair enough. I also don't think it's fair to go around calling them rapists and ruining their lives on what amounts to very very little evidence. Also fair enough IMO.
Beside this, the main point I've made is that a movement to
(a) improve the quality of life of complainants in rape cases by not forcing them through such despicable conditions and
(b) educate chauvinist rugby pricks and other groups where such opinions are commonly held
would be far more beneficial for society, and would gather far more momentum, than the current "Jackson is a rapist" movement which is only serving to further polarize opinions - which can easily be seen in this thread and across the internet.
Fair enough if you disagree. I honestly don't see how you can at this point, but I suppose some of you may be privy to more information than can be shared online in this case. That's my situation with the Ian Bailey case .
Last edited: