simplyared
Full Member
Cruyff, Rep, Neeskens
Because they've also had the best midfield ever behind them at their absolute best?Which is better between that trio and Pedro-Villa-Messi? Talent and buzz wise obviously MSN but Barca was so much more dominant trophy wise with that original trio.
This.Ronaldinho-Ronaldo-Rivaldo
Two are cnuts and it barely lasted one seasonShame on you lot. How can you forget this?
Rooney-Tevez-Ronaldo
Won us the league and champions league though in that one season. Do you count our titles less because of them then?Two are cnuts and it barely lasted one season
By fun, you mean masochism?It has to be Mane - Firminho - Salah
Minutes of fun watching those three
Given the fortune he has made from Qataris I think he would make the same decision again.Neymar - Suarez - Messi was the most talented front three of all time.
A shame Neymar wasted his career at PSG. He should have fought tooth and fecking nail to stay at Barca.
No, I just don't count them as one of the best trinities in football.Won us the league and champions league though in that one season. Do you count our titles less because of them then?
Not the best in football agreed but they were certainly the best attacking trio in a single season in the premier league.No, I just don't count them as one of the best trinities in football.
Going from Xavi to anyone is a massive step down but the busquet iniesta and rakitic trio isnt really inferior to anyone around europe. Cesc was still there too IIRC.Because they've also had the best midfield ever behind them at their absolute best?
MSN is better than PMS (not the best acronym tbf), just like a midfield with Xavi in it is better than a midfield with Rakitić and older Iniesta. And, just as you can expect, the team with a better attack will score more goals (110 vs 95 in the league) while the team with a better midfield will control the games better.Going from Xavi to anyone is a massive step down but the busquet iniesta and rakitic trio isnt really inferior to anyone around europe. Cesc was still there too IIRC.
Quality wise, do you think MSN is better than PMS?
I think Guardiola being the manager had a big impact too.Because they've also had the best midfield ever behind them at their absolute best?
MSN imo, they hard carried at times. Can only imagine a prime MSN with Xaviesta and Busquets behind. MVP (or Messi Villa Pedro) was my favourite though. To this day actually, Pedro is so underrated.Which is better between that trio and Pedro-Villa-Messi? Talent and buzz wise obviously MSN but Barca was so much more dominant trophy wise with that original trio.
no they weren’tMane - Firmino - Salah
Up there with MSN at times.
This is my answer. The first trinity I grew up with.
Talent wise, name by name there hasn't been any trident better than the current PSG one. But result wise they haven't won anything yet.
Still waiting for the CL-title though!
Anyone come up with anything better?