pixel
Full Member
Why isn't Welbeck included in this choice? I'd say he was as shite as the other two.
Welbeck was a far better player than both of them, his problems where mostly compounded by injuries.Why isn't Welbeck included in this choice? I'd say he was as shite as the other two.
Cleverley has made himself what he is through hard work and determination. That single minded attitude to be the best separates him from most players. Thats why he is as good as he is.
Lingard is just naturally gifted. His talent is effortless. The way the ball sticks to his feet and how he just seems to glide past players. You can't coach that.
For me, Lingard is a footballers footballer, Cleverley is one of those athletic phenomenons.
This is a discussion we'll be having for 50 years. So glad I witnessed both of these players at the peak of their abilities!
AmazingCleverley has made himself what he is through hard work and determination. That single minded attitude to be the best separates him from most players. Thats why he is as good as he is.
Lingard is just naturally gifted. His talent is effortless. The way the ball sticks to his feet and how he just seems to glide past players. You can't coach that.
For me, Lingard is a footballers footballer, Cleverley is one of those athletic phenomenons.
This is a discussion we'll be having for 50 years. So glad I witnessed both of these players at the peak of their abilities!
Once. What about 2016, 2017, 2019. This year he practically didn't play any role and when he was at the beginning we were considered for relegation. So 1 out of 4. With Cleverley we lost on GD the league, won the League and ended 7th.I mean, we literally finished 2nd with Lingard in the team.
no, that's why the thread had no replies since august 7th 2020 mateIs this even a debate anymore?
What the actual feck, haha. You murdered him.no, that's why the thread had no replies since august 7th 2020 mate