SharkyMcShark
Horrified
From their game against Villa.
Ridiculous
Ridiculous
The players were all part of the designated squad, any sensible ruling body would see that as within that rule, but no not Richard fecking Scudamore.Good. They agreed to the rules and then they broke them, I don't know how they can complain about that.
Erm, because the rules are pathetic?Good. They agreed to the rules and then they broke them, I don't know how they can complain about that.
Good. They agreed to the rules and then they broke them, I don't know how they can complain about that.
Exactly. If they are good enough to be in the squad of a premier league side, they are good enough to play a premier league match. Ridiculous rule and an insult to the players.I don't understand. With the 25 man squad system as long as the players are part of that how on earth can it be considered fielding a weakened side?
The 25 man squad rule has nothing to do with the rule in question here.The players were all part of the designated squad, any sensible ruling body would see that as within that rule, but no not Richard fecking Scudamore.
Do you know who sets the rules for Premier League Clubs? Premier League Clubs, including Blackpool. Last summer the clubs, including Blackpool, had the opportunity to change the rules, and chose not to.Erm, because the rules are pathetic?
Erm, it directly affects it, if a squad names 25 players who can play it's up to them what they so with them, it's not like they sent out a bunch of youth teamers is it?The 25 man squad rule has nothing to do with the rule in question here.
Most of the clubs did want to get rid of it, for whatever reason it didn't happen.Do you know who sets the rules for Premier League Clubs? Premier League Clubs, including Blackpool. Last summer the clubs, including Blackpool, had the opportunity to change the rules, and chose not to.
In any case, it's ridiculous to agree to a set of rules, then break them and complain when you get punished.
Because we can do what we want.why didnt we get a fine away to hull in what was a crucial game?
Youth players can play irrespective of being in the 25 man squad. It's obviously not up to them to do what they feel like with them, because there are rules such as this.Erm, it directly affects it, if a squad names 25 players who can play it's up to them what they so with them, it's not like they sent out a bunch of youth teamers is it?
Source for this?Most of the clubs did want to get rid of it, for whatever reason it didn't happen.
Probably because we won.why didnt we get a fine away to hull in what was a crucial game?
This rule that by the premier leagues previous statement they have incorrectly used time and again?Youth players can play irrespective of being in the 25 man squad. It's obviously not up to them to do what they feel like with them, because there are rules such as this.
Pretty much every club complains about it whenever something crops up, as you are well aware.Source for this?
Ridiculous argument but, now understand there are people out there that are silly enough to think they know what is going on at a club, the fitness of players, how they are training etc to decide of what is their strongest team.In any case, it's ridiculous to agree to a set of rules, then break them and complain when you get punished.
I can't see anything there about being allowed to play 25 man squads.This rule that by the premier leagues previous statement they have incorrectly used time and again?
Premier League clarify "weakened team" rules - ESPN Soccernet
So you don't have a source for it? I'm guessing you don't, because it never happened, if most clubs wanted to get rid of the rule then it would have been publicised. It exists to protect the integrity of the League, it's a good rule.Pretty much every club complains about it whenever something crops up, as you are well aware.
Are you saying it wasn't a weakened side from Blackpool?Ridiculous argument but, now understand there are people out there that are silly enough to think they know what is going on at a club, the fitness of players, how they are training etc to decide of what is their strongest team.
For any club to have been deemed to have broken the rule - there needs to be facts proving the team was weakened and that if they had played PlayerX, Y and Z -they would have been stronger. It is a presumption on their part and no way provable.
There are many idiotic rules and laws in the game and life but, just because people haven't taken the steps to get them removed doesn't make them any less idiotic. The reason for this rule is to maintain the integrity of the game but, the ruling makes a mockery of the spirit of the rule especially since it was a competitive game.
it's actually from before that rule, and states that in times of fixture congestion (3 games in a week is kind if that)I can't see anything there about being allowed to play 25 man squads.
Are you denying managers speak out often about not liking this pathetic rule that favours the bigger clubs as they have deeper squads, was our side against Hull not worthy of being fined? (without fixture congestion too may I add)So you don't have a source for it? I'm guessing you don't, because it never happened, if most clubs wanted to get rid of the rule then it would have been publicised. It exists to protect the integrity of the League, it's a good rule.
Are you saying big clubs should be able to get away with this?Are you saying it wasn't a weakened side from Blackpool?
I was wondering this.Can't you say everyone was injured?
Hard to argue you've fielded a weakened team when you win, no?United made 11 changes for the Hull game 2 years back. No punishment.
Arsenal made 8 changes for the Wigan game last month. No punishment.
Nah, we'd get fined every time we played Gibson and O'Shea.what a load of bollocks. Who are they to decide what a weakened team is? Do they have score cards for each player on record? If so, i'd love to see what they use, bet its bloody FM statistics and its updated by members of the fecking transfer forum from each teams forum boards