you've convinced me lets call it 150
There were reports that they were willing to offer upto 120m for Salah? It will have to be in that range.For a 30 year old? I’d imagine they’d offer us enough for it to be seen as a sensible enough offer but him a monumental salary.
Don’t see him going, though. At least not for another 2 years or so. Fernandes doesn’t strike as that type of player (dreams can’t be buy) but the wealth on offer is life changing.
Would £100m really be enough?
He's worth so much more to us as a team right now than what his actual market value is (eg. what a club like PSG or Madrid realistically offer us if they were interested) - which is probably 60 up to 80m based on his age and current form.
Would need to be 150m minimum, probably closer to 180m given our current state of affairs and his current level of importance in the team. Even then, I would still be anxious as I don't trust our team to invest that money well based on our recent track record in the transfer market.
I would 120 to 130. And get Wirtz or wharton. I mean he is good but he is turning 31 in September. If he can help with getting wirtz or whatron so be it.
This is gonna be good…Can't they just buy United instead. Jim and Glazers gone and we can keep Bruno.
And how could they resist Luke Shaw the British Cafu or Mason Mount the British… erm… Lampard ?Surely there’s a market for Hojlund and Onana in Saudi.
Let's keep our fingers crossed then.
Unpopular opinion, but I would have no issue letting him go even if its for 80m. And I know the likely scenario is that the recruitment team are going to blow it on someone half as good for 1.5x the money, but I think we need to move on from Bruno if we ever want to go back to the top. I am dreamer, who would like to keep believing that they'd eventually get it right, even if it looks like a pipe dream right now.
How about we sell Bruno for a really hefty price to invest for the future, meanwhile we sign Kevin De Bruyne for free as a stopgap while our young players grow (Cavani-esque)?Moving the discussion out of the transfer thread.
The idea of moving on from Bruno is not a bad one in of itself, but the team is so so shit right now that we will need Bruno at least for another season, the squad needs further strengthening any several positions, especially in attack and midfield, and until we do that, Bruno remains a necessity to survive.
even if we disregard the fact that he is a City legend, a 33yo injury-prone on the decline KdB who would demand top salary, won't do much with us, he would be a liability like Eriksen.How about we sell Bruno for a really hefty price to invest for the future, meanwhile we sign Kevin De Bruyne for free as a stopgap while our young players grow (Cavani-esque)?
I won't mind him staying for another season either. Next season is going to be another one where we are in transition. However, if someone offers a decent amount in the summer then I think we should consider it. If Amo stays, then in his system the best space for Bruno I see is in central midfield, but I think we should get a proper central midfielder with vision, passing and ability to beat the press to partner Ugarte/whoever we decide as the first choice for the box to box role.Moving the discussion out of the transfer thread.
The idea of moving on from Bruno is not a bad one in of itself, but the team is so so shit right now that we will need Bruno at least for another season, the squad needs further strengthening any several positions, especially in attack and midfield, and until we do that, Bruno remains a necessity to survive.
He's one of a few actual top players we have. But I think it's time (long overdue in fact) to rebuild and if we can get a good fee for him then it makes sense for both sides for him to move on.
The last line is what makes this a nonstarter for me. Of course 100m for a 31 year old makes a lot of sense in an economical sense, but just imagine where we'd be without Bruno (and an adequate replacement)31 next season if this was Madrid they’d probably cash in and have a viable replacement lined up.
I love Bruno but if they’re willing to pay 100m+ for a 31 year old we’d have to look at it surely.
The key is having the right players to come in and replace him and I’m not convinced this club would do that
INEOS themselves gave Bruno his current wages. They made him the benchmark, no way they sell him. The problem with Case and Rashford was underperformance, Bruno doesn't have that issue.I don’t think there’s truth to this. Most of the Saudi’s transfer fees seem to be marginally inflated from Europe fees, the difference is the obscene wages they offer.
If they are offering a ridiculous transfer fee, I have zero doubt INEOS will push him out. Their end goal is to get rid of all the high earners and reset our wage structure. Both Casemiro and Rashford were frozen out, Rashford left and will be sold and Casemiro fortunately refused to leave and found his way back into the team out of necessity.
That will be proof we have zero ambition. If there's a player out there performing at a similar level he'll cost 100+ and there's no guarantee he'll make the adaptation to the league and team.To many talk with their feelings.
If they actually offers something like 125 mio pounds for Bruno, then of course United should accept it.
Unsellable but sellableTo many talk with their feelings.
If they actually offers something like 125 mio pounds for Bruno, then of course United should accept it.
If we actually get the player you describe in the bolded, as well as a creative 10 that can score goals, then yes, we can let go of Bruno.I won't mind him staying for another season either. Next season is going to be another one where we are in transition. However, if someone offers a decent amount in the summer then I think we should consider it. If Amo stays, then in his system the best space for Bruno I see is in central midfield, but I think we should get a proper central midfielder with vision, passing and ability to beat the press to partner Ugarte/whoever we decide as the first choice for the box to box role.
Can we get that player? I am not sure. The most logical answer is no given the state of our recruitment.
Do I think we'll be a better team if we can get that player? A hundred percent.