Centre Back... Who do we go for?

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,168
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
I certainly would prefer him in my team than any of the over hyped English center backs like Maguire and Stones
Duffy or Dunk? I’m not sure I fully agree if you mean Dunk, but I think he deserves a shot at a higher level.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
Ruben Dias for £60m would be a good signing (from what I’ve seen of him) looks a very good player reads the game well and gets tackles in early very accomplished player.
 

friendlytramp

More full of crap than a curry house toilet
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
4,036
Location
J Stand
More dominant/commanding keeper plus decent DM and we can work with Lindelof and Smalling or Lindelof/Smalling/Shaw as a 3.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,111
Location
Dublin, Ireland
I think Nathan Ake would be a good buy. Has PL experience. Only reason he is not in the Dutch team is because of de Ligt and Van Dijk. He is left footed good in the air and can cover for Shaw at left back. Also wouldn't cost a fortune
I thought he was English?
 

Varun

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
46,780
Location
Mumbai
Jonathan Tah from Leverkusen looks the most interesting player if we can't get the obvious choices we're linked to.

He's physically imposing at 6'4 and is also fast. Good on the ball from what I've read and is still young at 23.

Admittedly I've only seen him in action via YouTube which isn't the best way to judge a player. So if anyone who has watched him play for Leverkusen for a period of time, care to share their thoughts on Tah's potential?

Koulibaly at 23-24 took off under the tutelage of Maurizio Sarri. Mainly because he had the tools that Sarri could work with, like ability on the ball, physicality and pace. Tah seems to have very similar strengths, but is better in dealing with aerial balls due to being 6'4.

He's quality, would love him here if we can't land the usual suspects in De Ligt and Koulibaly.
 

Andersons Dietician

Full Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
13,244
Jonathan Tah from Leverkusen looks the most interesting player if we can't get the obvious choices we're linked to.

He's physically imposing at 6'4 and is also fast. Good on the ball from what I've read and is still young at 23.

Admittedly I've only seen him in action via YouTube which isn't the best way to judge a player. So if anyone who has watched him play for Leverkusen for a period of time, care to share their thoughts on Tah's potential?

Koulibaly at 23-24 took off under the tutelage of Maurizio Sarri. Mainly because he had the tools that Sarri could work with, like ability on the ball, physicality and pace. Tah seems to have very similar strengths, but is better in dealing with aerial balls due to being 6'4.

I do think he would be a very interesting player however you know when people say Smalling always has a mistake in him. This is what they’d say about Tah. Because he can be excellent and then other times he has some right gafs.

So I can only imagine what the CAF would make of him but he is certainly worth considering and if he gets his consistency and concentration sorted he could be one hell of a defender. Don’t know how much he’d be going for either but in this market I would think somewhere between 40-60 although I think I recall seeing something saying they want 80.

Still holding out hope we get DeLigt but If we can’t have him then I’d probably rather have Tah than Slabhead.
 
Last edited:

Aloysius's Back 3

New Member
Joined
May 21, 2018
Messages
2,770
I've never seen him play - is John Brooks of Wolfsburg rubbish? Just asking because seeing if there is any left footed CB that is good not at Barcelona.
 

red woppit

Full Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Messages
2,255
Location
Buchebi
Supports
Northampton Town
We need a leader at the back, and looking at what we have at the moment, that is definitely missing. I quite liked the look of Baillie when he first joined, but he is a player who certainly needs guidance, Lindelof has played well, but like Shaw, I'm not totally convinced with him. Rojo and Smalling, with VAR coming in, will almost certainly be giving penalties away, and Rojo will see several red cards. Jones has had some decent games, but is liable to brain farts too often to be reliable. Tuanzebe could be a top Prem CB in my opinion, but I think he needs a full season, possibly with Villa, in the Prem to gain that experience. I could be wrong, and during the pre season may give Ole an indication that he is ready, but is not a leader, yet. I don't think we will get rid of any CB's, (unless we get a ridiculous bid for any of them) until we sign one or two new ones, so most of these I've mentioned will be here all season, I think next summer will see most of them go.
De Ligt is the only one I would move heaven and earth to get.
 

Fosu-Mens

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
4,101
Location
Fred | 2019/20 Performances
I think Nathan Ake would be a good buy. Has PL experience. Only reason he is not in the Dutch team is because of de Ligt and Van Dijk. He is left footed good in the air and can cover for Shaw at left back. Also wouldn't cost a fortune
Definitely agree on Ake. Would be my preferred choice unless by some miracle de Ligt does end up here. Ake and Lindelof would be a pretty good first choice combination and both still have upside and so could form a real partnership in the new look squad.
Yes. Mobile and fast, can hold his own against pacy dribblers, does not recklessly dive into tackles, good on the ball, experience in the league(for those that think this is a must), would count as homegrown and despite not being a tank he seldom gets pushed around by the Deeneys and Mitrovics.
 

BlueHaze

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
4,453
I think Nathan Ake would be a good buy. Has PL experience. Only reason he is not in the Dutch team is because of de Ligt and Van Dijk. He is left footed good in the air and can cover for Shaw at left back. Also wouldn't cost a fortune
Imo he is better than anything we have including Lindelöf.
 

Aloysius's Back 3

New Member
Joined
May 21, 2018
Messages
2,770
If Barcelona sign De Ligt we should go for Umtiti on loan for the season, with an option to buy.
My hope is that we manage to sneak in de ligt this season & next season take a punt on the injury prone Umtiti that turns out well for us since Barcelona have lenglet anyway.

A bit of a fantasy land no doubt but de ligt & an injury free Umtiti would be hell of a partnership.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
Centre back is a worry for me, because in spite of the reservations about Smalling and Jones (as well as Bailly) supporters have, just about every recommendation I seem to come across is objectively worse.

Smalling and Jones are good defenders, you know. They make mistakes, and on the ball they are an issue, but some like to dramatise their weaknesses tenfold. However, they’ve been here long enough for us to realise that we need to go to the market to sort the position out. But the suggestions (Ake, Lascelles, Schar, even Maguire) just aren’t much of an improvement. Some of them are inferior, playing for teams in which their mistakes are unreported. Smalling, in particular, would look phenomenal at a side further down the table, in which defending for much of the game is more common and playing out from the back is less of a concern.

For me, the answer lies somewhere in the middle, and it’s why the club (in my opinion) has been reticent to blow money on sub par alternatives. De Ligt, Koulibaly, Umtiti? Ay, go for it. But these players might not be attainable. Unless the club can pull a gem from out of nowhere, I think this position is more difficult than perhaps any other to improve.
 

ArjenIsM3

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
5,643
Location
Netherlands
How would that work if they have a ban?
That's an interesting situation indeed. Do Chelsea have the right to refuse Bournemouth to sell one of their assets just because Chelsea have a transfer ban? Or would they buy Ake back without being able to play him for a year thus wasting him?
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,168
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
That's an interesting situation indeed. Do Chelsea have the right to refuse Bournemouth to sell one of their assets just because Chelsea have a transfer ban? Or would they buy Ake back without being able to play him for a year thus wasting him?
Yeah, I’m genuinely curious as to how that works. If it works the same as an option, it’s only the right, not the obligation to buy - this can expire.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,280
Location
Barrow In Furness
Centre back is a worry for me, because in spite of the reservations about Smalling and Jones (as well as Bailly) supporters have, just about every recommendation I seem to come across is objectively worse.

Smalling and Jones are good defenders, you know. They make mistakes, and on the ball they are an issue, but some like to dramatise their weaknesses tenfold. However, they’ve been here long enough for us to realise that we need to go to the market to sort the position out. But the suggestions (Ake, Lascelles, Schar, even Maguire) just aren’t much of an improvement. Some of them are inferior, playing for teams in which their mistakes are unreported. Smalling, in particular, would look phenomenal at a side further down the table, in which defending for much of the game is more common and playing out from the back is less of a concern.

For me, the answer lies somewhere in the middle, and it’s why the club (in my opinion) has been reticent to blow money on sub par alternatives. De Ligt, Koulibaly, Umtiti? Ay, go for it. But these players might not be attainable. Unless the club can pull a gem from out of nowhere, I think this position is more difficult than perhaps any other to improve.
Isn't Umtiti as bad injury wise as Jones recently and probably why they want De Ligt and want rid of him?
 

Cliche Guevara

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
3,790
Location
Inverness
That's an interesting situation indeed. Do Chelsea have the right to refuse Bournemouth to sell one of their assets just because Chelsea have a transfer ban? Or would they buy Ake back without being able to play him for a year thus wasting him?
It is a registration ban technically.

They could still buy him and, I think, leave him to play at Bournemouth this season.

Notwithstanding a registration ban might, somehow, invalidate a buy-back option.

Of course, the player has to agree to any deal so if he doesn’t want to go back to Chelsea it’s probably irrelevant.
 

DarkRed

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 28, 2019
Messages
359
Location
wolf den
Yeah, I’m genuinely curious as to how that works. If it works the same as an option, it’s only the right, not the obligation to buy - this can expire.
And another question:
If they want to buy him with this buyback clause, can he refuse them, if let's say he wants to joint us?
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,280
Location
Barrow In Furness
Probably. Which makes the situation even harder for us.
Yep. It needs really good scouting for this because all I am reading about is targets for other positions who would rather stay where they are or go elsewhere than come to us. So if they decide to go young and up and coming they really need to have done their homework. Just think we like going to easy route and then fall flat on our faces.
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
5,077
Is Godfrey worth a punt, probably be quite cheap whilst Norwich are still in the Championship league.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,168
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
And another question:
If they want to buy him with this buyback clause, can he refuse them, if let's say he wants to joint us?
This was mentioned about morata in another thread. It would depend on the agreement. Can’t be sure.
 

Keeps It tidy

Hates Messi
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
17,638
Location
New York
Shane Duffy, 6'4, scores headers, leader at the back reads the game well 27 years old. Not saying he's the be all and end all but he's better than our current lot and would cost feck all. Well worth a punt in my opinion.
Our CB situation is not that dire.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
I know they’re not great, but you’d honestly switch one of them for a CB who nearly got relegated?
This is where we're at with the centre half debate. Replacing Jones with Shane Duffy. Brighton conceded 60 goals last season; how many of those could Shane Duffy had done more to prevent? I know that isn't the best way to view centre halves, especially in poorer teams, but these underreported players are all well and good until they're in your team. Then you quickly realise that, actually, they're no better than what's already at the club. Jones, believe it or not, could go to a team like Leicester and put in some tremendous performances. He isn't the halfwit he's made out to be. Unfit, yes. But not poor.
 

Fosu-Mens

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
4,101
Location
Fred | 2019/20 Performances
I know they’re not great, but you’d honestly switch one of them for a CB who nearly got relegated?
As a potential 4th/5th option CB then yes. Also, the point of having backups are to use them when the starters needs a rest or are injured, not them being the ones being injured all the time. Also, Rojo and Jones dives into tackles all the time. Something that should only be the last resort for a defender, not the only resort.
 

AJ10

Full Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2018
Messages
2,498
I think we just need a CB who is really,really good now and not another potential.
 

Fosu-Mens

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
4,101
Location
Fred | 2019/20 Performances
This is where we're at with the centre half debate. Replacing Jones with Shane Duffy. Brighton conceded 60 goals last season; how many of those could Shane Duffy had done more to prevent? I know that isn't the best way to view centre halves, especially in poorer teams, but these underreported players are all well and good until they're in your team. Then you quickly realise that, actually, they're no better than what's already at the club. Jones, believe it or not, could go to a team like Leicester and put in some tremendous performances. He isn't the halfwit he's made out to be. Unfit, yes. But not poor.
Not a discussion on buying Duffy as a starter obviously (hopefully), more as a non-injured 4th/5th option. Ability-wise, I think they are somewhat on the same level, but Rojo and Jones's injury record does not speak well for them in regards to being dependable backups.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,168
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
This is where we're at with the centre half debate. Replacing Jones with Shane Duffy. Brighton conceded 60 goals last season; how many of those could Shane Duffy had done more to prevent? I know that isn't the best way to view centre halves, especially in poorer teams, but these underreported players are all well and good until they're in your team. Then you quickly realise that, actually, they're no better than what's already at the club. Jones, believe it or not, could go to a team like Leicester and put in some tremendous performances. He isn't the halfwit he's made out to be. Unfit, yes. But not poor.
Yep, I feel sorry for Jones a bit. He’s obviously not anywhere near the level we need consistently, but he’s surely better than fecking Shane Duffy.
As a potential 4th/5th option CB then yes. Also, the point of having backups are to use them when the starters needs a rest or are injured, not them being the ones being injured all the time. Also, Rojo and Jones dives into tackles all the time. Something that should only be the last resort for a defender, not the only resort.
Just seems like a giant waste of time to sign someone who will hardly ever play and is no better than what we already have. Rojo is still an Argentina international when fit.
 

eltigreFalcao

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2018
Messages
460
Location
Buenos Aires
I do think he would be a very interesting player however you know when people say Smalling always has a mistake in him. This is what they’d say about Tah. Because he can be excellent and then other times he has some right gafs.

So I can only imagine what the CAF would make of him but he is certainly worth considering and if he gets his consistency and concentration sorted he could be one hell of a defender. Don’t know how much he’d be going for either but in this market I would think somewhere between 40-60 although I think I recall seeing something saying they want 80.

Still holding out hope we get DeLigt but If we can’t have him then I’d probably rather have Tah than Slabhead.
Who cares what the caf would make of a player?
 

Fosu-Mens

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
4,101
Location
Fred | 2019/20 Performances
Yep, I feel sorry for Jones a bit. He’s obviously not anywhere near the level we need consistently, but he’s surely better than fecking Shane Duffy.

Just seems like a giant waste of time to sign someone who will hardly ever play and is no better than what we already have. Rojo is still an Argentina international when fit.
I am not suggestion we sign Duffy, but in theory we would be better off with him as a backup compared to Rojo and Jones.