Oles first big testLet’s see how they react versus Wolves in 3 days.
A lot of people are saying this but is it really important though? He's a leader, it's plain to see. Do we really need him to be wearing the armband?Make him captain already. He’s the heartbeat of this team.
Set the tone and raise the bar Bruno.
Stop itOles first big test
Well it makes sense to, at the end of the day you want your captain to be the one who is the biggest leader.A lot of people are saying this but is it really important though? He's a leader, it's plain to see. Do we really need him to be wearing the armband?
@Anustart89
Saw that, very encouraging signs.
Really? For saying something similar to fernandes?It's funny that when people on the forum say something similar to Fernandes about the game, they will have loads of people jump down their throats, saying they're never happy about anything. I wonder what their opinions on this quote are?
In multiple threads it has been suggested that we should have won, or certain players should have done better in situations that could have lead to us winning, only to be met with responses boiling down to 'there is nothing wrong with that result, we can be happy with it, stop moaning about everything'. Given the context of how the game went, not just the result on paper, I personally wasn't happy with a draw, obviously the players weren't happy with one either, so why has any criticism of the performance been met with the responses I've mentioned above, from a decent amount of posters?Really? For saying something similar to fernandes?
Right, these defenders never hold up their hand. They are never ever holding themselves up to any accountability regarding idiotic defending. They are giving away goals every single game. Soft and nice all the time.Not conceding 20 goals in the next 10 games would be a good start.
It’s slightly different. We’re assessing the progress of the team, and giving credit to a process that is not finished yet and probably won’t yield a trophy. Our ex-players as pundits generally say we’re not there yet.In multiple threads it has been suggested that we should have won, or certain players should have done better in situations that could have lead to us winning, only to be met with responses boiling down to 'there is nothing wrong with that result, we can be happy with it, stop moaning about everything'. Given the context of how the game went, not just the result on paper, I personally wasn't happy with a draw, obviously the players weren't happy with one either, so why has any criticism of the performance been met with the responses I've mentioned above, from a decent amount of posters?
You're exaggerating I think.In multiple threads it has been suggested that we should have won, or certain players should have done better in situations that could have lead to us winning, only to be met with responses boiling down to 'there is nothing wrong with that result, we can be happy with it, stop moaning about everything'. Given the context of how the game went, not just the result on paper, I personally wasn't happy with a draw, obviously the players weren't happy with one either, so why has any criticism of the performance been met with the responses I've mentioned above, from a decent amount of posters?
The perspectives are different, yes, but my point still stands. It's difficult to post valid criticisms of anything on the forum, without being lumped into the same category as those that have no objectivity when it comes to players or the manager whatsoever.It’s slightly different. We’re assessing the progress of the team, and giving credit to a process that is not finished yet and probably won’t yield a trophy. Our ex-players as pundits generally say we’re not there yet.
Players, on the other hand, are super competitive people at the top of their field in the world’s most popular sport, and HAVE to believe they have a solid shot at the Premiership this year, and should be harsher on themselves than we are. We’re supporters, after all.
Anyway, people disagreeing is not a big deal. I don’t think people on here have been witch-hunted for saying we should have won or performed better.
I think that’s more to do with people suggesting we’re not making progress. Maybe I’m wrong, but I feel like people are receptive to level-headed criticism.The perspectives are different, yes, but my point still stands. It's difficult to post valid criticisms of anything on the forum, without being lumped into the same category as those that have no objectivity when it comes to players or the manager whatsoever.
I think possibly you could be mixing up one of a few things:In multiple threads it has been suggested that we should have won, or certain players should have done better in situations that could have lead to us winning, only to be met with responses boiling down to 'there is nothing wrong with that result, we can be happy with it, stop moaning about everything'. Given the context of how the game went, not just the result on paper, I personally wasn't happy with a draw, obviously the players weren't happy with one either, so why has any criticism of the performance been met with the responses I've mentioned above, from a decent amount of posters?
How are you going to say that to Maguire if you are Ole?Well it makes sense to, at the end of the day you want your captain to be the one who is the biggest leader.
No doubting he’s the biggest leader in the team, Maguire should be vice captain.
I think it would be a just reward for the exceptional start he’s had and the determination and desire he’s shown.
I agree it would be harsh to take it from Maguire. Perhaps wait until he’s out/rested and then give Bruno a few games as captain then ease it across to him over time.How are you going to say that to Maguire if you are Ole?
You don’t need to wear the armband to be leader, you need many different kind of leaders in the squad.
Okay, no one disputing (in multiple threads) that we should have won or certain players could do better.In multiple threads it has been suggested that we should have won, or certain players should have done better in situations that could have lead to us winning, only to be met with responses boiling down to 'there is nothing wrong with that result, we can be happy with it, stop moaning about everything'. Given the context of how the game went, not just the result on paper, I personally wasn't happy with a draw, obviously the players weren't happy with one either, so why has any criticism of the performance been met with the responses I've mentioned above, from a decent amount of posters?
I agree. I think leave it how it is. He is so influential, he doesn't need to be captain.A lot of people are saying this but is it really important though? He's a leader, it's plain to see. Do we really need him to be wearing the armband?