- Joined
- Jun 16, 2011
- Messages
- 491
Wondering if the display on Saturday has speeded up our pursuit of some key positions?
It's a must we have people in for the new season.
It's a must we have people in for the new season.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Yeah more of a change in job title to reflect his actual role I suppose.Fletcher had nothing to do with being a ‘technical director’, despite his title.
Most of his work is with the youth teams and being a conduit into the first team. He shouldn’t be affected by this appointment.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Would rather delay a year so the new ownership can show they aren’t taking these tiny clubs’ shit anymoreGive it another year and these guys might finally start working at United.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Well, these positions were either vacant, non existent, or held by clueless bank managers so it cant possibly not pay offSigning other clubs' directors instead of their players is a bold strategy, but let's see if it pays off for us.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Not as easy as that Fab…
Exactly what I thought what’s he gonna do?
That's exactly the level it makes sense to have it at!All this notice period stuff at a director level is a nonsense really. Get it out the game.
No it doesn’t. Let people work where they want. Life and especially football ain’t that serious.That's exactly the level it makes sense to have it at!
So why not do the same for the manager, for the players etc.No it doesn’t. Let people work where they want. Life and especially football ain’t that serious.
They can sign a contract or not sign a contract, it's up to them whether they want to or not. Whatever Wilcox has signed, that's what he will be held to, and rightly so, it was his choice.No it doesn’t. Let people work where they want. Life and especially football ain’t that serious.
Certain terms in contracts aren't legally binding if they impinge on certain rights. Don't know about this situation tbh, but the general argument that whatever he signed should be held to doesn't hold up in all cases. I could sign a 60 hour work week contract for example, but it doesn't mean I'd have to or should have to do more than 40 hours. Would this gardening leave stuff hold up in court?They can sign a contract or not sign a contract, it's up to them whether they want to or not. Whatever Wilcox has signed, that's what he will be held to, and rightly so, it was his choice.
If you signed something in a vague belief that it didn't really matter that would be a shade dumb I think. I'm no expert so I would read every thing very carefully first and seek advice over anything I wasn't sure about personally.Certain terms in contracts aren't legally binding if they impinge on certain rights. Don't know about this situation tbh, but the general argument that whatever he signed should be held to doesn't hold up in all cases. I could sign a 60 hour work week contract for example, but it doesn't mean I'd have to or should have to do more than 40 hours. Would this gardening leave stuff hold up in court?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Someone who only has 600 odd followers and has paid for a blue tickWho’s Darragh Moloney? Someone to listen to or another Twitter no one?
Yep, I think they were hoping for a smoother resolution and the current events might throw a wrench in planning for next season. This is part of the reality we are going to face in the transfer market as well, so it might be a nice reminder for them that when it comes to United other teams have a different approach. Of course, that is a part of our image that has to change.Outside of Berrada our other two appointments involve some form of compensation dispute
As long as he leaves his iPad behind.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Not very clever to have a 12 month period. If you doing great in your job and knowing Southampton is only a stepping, why would you put in a 12 month period? I would never accept a 12 month period. There are so many unknown like your boss sucks or the culture is bad. 3-6 months would be good enough.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
In senior roles in business (not just football) 12 months is quite common. Normally it’s a point you can’t negotiate much if you want the top jobs.Not very clever to have a 12 month period. If you doing great in your job and knowing Southampton is only a stepping, why would you put in a 12 month period? I would never accept a 12 month period. There are so many unknown like your boss sucks or the culture is bad. 3-6 months would be good enough.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
feck it, might as well, who else is there?Going for McKenna now would be nuts. Too much of a punt there's a hell of a difference between Championship and PL.
Wow So United are targeting Hugo Viena Lisbon's sporting Director for COO position how stupid these so called ITK are , they should just stick with making shit up about players transfer because other wise they run the real risk of making fool of themselves .Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date