- Joined
- Jan 16, 2022
- Messages
- 874
- Supports
- Neutral
He works well with functional, chip-on-the-shoulder players willing to follow instructions in a disciplined manner, yet knock-out CL football is casual, end-to-end, high quality and creative game… something a control freak like him cannot bear at all.
In terms of personality, isn't Conte a bit similar to Mourinho??It's due to his managing style: don't talk, just do what I tell you. So he would pick players from that profile, which usually exclude flair, high maintenance players.
Conte can drill his very good player to play to 100% level and accumulate points in the league to become title challenger/champion. However, in cup games, top flair players in other team can get into zone. They both fulfill tactic to the same level of Conte team, and express Xfactor. In a sense those players would perform over 100% level, which no managers have tactical answer to. The only thing you can do is fight fire with fire, but Conte team would lack in that fire power.
Then you look at someone like Ancelotti who is one of the best modern day cup managers and see the contrast. He knows to keep high maintenance players in line through man management instead task master approach. Even seen letting his senior players have input on tactic.
Conte at Real Madrid or PSG with high maintenance players is recipe for disaster. It might be a turning point for Conte's career for the worse like Mourinho. Conte is more suitable as Simeone replacement if the latter ever leaves Atletico. It's hard to decline Real Madrid invitation though.
So how would you explain Mourinho's amazing success in European competitions?
Is it because in his pomp, Jose was simply a superior manager to what Conte is now? Or am I overlooking some big differences between the two??