Coronavirus in football

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,240
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
Yeah I saw that 92% figure earlier on BBC and thought, that's crap.

PL using spin now to not look so pathetic.

Double jabbed is still very low compared to other top leagues.

Still so many on 1 jab or none even.

EL is even worse.
And that 'on the journey' phrase can feck off and all... Chancers :lol:
 

Red Dreams

Full Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Messages
55,373
Location
Across the Universe....from Old Trafford.
It's easily done for teams out of cups and Europe to catch up.

Problem is, the PL don't care about teams in Europe so they will put United in a game the day before Champs League if they can cos they don't care.
It may not be that crazy, But even if it is a two day break what about travelling.

These decisions are driven by money, not safety. That is the problem.

EDIT:

What you said made me think of Munich.

Why I have never forgiven the FA.
 
Last edited:

always_hoping

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
7,804
If Burnley v Man United goes ahead on December 30th it will be Uniteds 2nd game in 4 days while it will be Burnleys 2nd game in 18 days.
 

Nicolarra90

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
1,331
I don't know about you, but with all the suspensions, plus all the expectation from preseason, to the realization we suck, the sacking of Ole and the fact that we didn't really have a new manager bounce... I'm feeling very disconnected from this season, Moyes season kind of disconnected. Only CR7 and his willpower to play the UCL keeping it kind of alive.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,241
PL really need to do something or there will be teams that are 5-6 matches or more behind.
There's probably 2 choices

1)Have a break, which takes 3 games out for all teams, meaning all teams have hard work fitting those in later on.
With there being every chance in a week or 2 of more covid issues.

2)Try and get as many games played as possible.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,241
Mate, it’s Burnley.
Haven't we only beaten them at home about once in 4 seasons now?

But yes, it is ever so slightly small time worrying about little Burnley who have a small squad, having an advantage when we've not played for about 10 days!
 

R'hllor

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,419
Guess PL will just push on, postpone where they really have to, play everything else.
 

Pep's Suit

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
1,705
Yeah, they obviously have to play as many games as possible. If they stop now that wouldn't change anything so rather try to continue even if they have to postpone 2, 3 or 4 matches every round for next 5-6 weeks.
 

NewYorkRed

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 11, 2021
Messages
1,609
They should have taken the financial hit (they can afford it) and taken a break. This season is just going to be a mess now.
 

DRJosh

Full Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
2,939
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Supports
United minus the Glazers
While a suspension of the league sounds good in theory, there is no guarantee that the players won't get infected during the break with the end-of-year festivities upon us. One could argue the danger of getting COVID is higher if a break is introduced and players are able to move around the country more.

If however every player is made to stick to a pre-defined bubble (social group) then a temporary suspension of the league may be useful. But this warrants a considerable amount of trust in players to do the right thing. The consequent fixture pile up however may make that option untenable.
 

non profit football

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 14, 2021
Messages
125
Supports
Chelsea
What a mess!
There doesn't seem to be anyone able to use common sense and handle the matter properly.

Many people will lose interest in the competition, nobody understands why some games are canceled and others not, clearly clubs no longer have any kind of bubble.

There must be clear rules, transparency and punishment for those who break protocols, if things go at this pace the best thing is to close the season.
 

peridigm

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
13,868
There's probably 2 choices

1)Have a break, which takes 3 games out for all teams, meaning all teams have hard work fitting those in later on.
With there being every chance in a week or 2 of more covid issues.

2)Try and get as many games played as possible.
Only one of these choices stops the spread amongst players. The other lets the season continue as it is and putting off the inevitable.
 

choccy77

New Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2008
Messages
6,059
While a suspension of the league sounds good in theory, there is no guarantee that the players won't get infected during the break with the end-of-year festivities upon us. One could argue the danger of getting COVID is higher if a break is introduced and players are able to move around the country more.

If however every player is made to stick to a pre-defined bubble (social group) then a temporary suspension of the league may be useful. But this warrants a considerable amount of trust in players to do the right thing. The consequent fixture pile up however may make that option untenable.
Henderson was in London 2 nights ago for no real justified reason.

It's things like this that are just stupid.
 

peridigm

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
13,868
While a suspension of the league sounds good in theory, there is no guarantee that the players won't get infected during the break with the end-of-year festivities upon us. One could argue the danger of getting COVID is higher if a break is introduced and players are able to move around the country more.

If however every player is made to stick to a pre-defined bubble (social group) then a temporary suspension of the league may be useful. But this warrants a considerable amount of trust in players to do the right thing. The consequent fixture pile up however may make that option untenable.
Clubs could impose fines or punishment for not obeying the bubble rules but they would need to be isolated from family to rule out any alternate risks of being infected. Can’t see them going that far with it.
 

NewYorkRed

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 11, 2021
Messages
1,609
But what happens if they start getting cases again after that break?
I mean cases in bursts are always going to happen, but a break when cases were peaking to break the cycle would have made the most sense. The UK will be in a much better place daily case wise in a week or two going off SA’s trajectory.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,199
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
I mean cases in bursts are always going to happen, but a break when cases were peaking to break the cycle would have made the most sense. The UK will be in a much better place daily case wise in a week or two going off SA’s trajectory.
Maybe but with a younger average population, most scientists suggest UK (older population) could be hit harder and if our peak isn’t until mid/late Jan (and they’re still predicting/guessing yet), a break could see us come out in the peak.

A four week break may help a lot from a health perspective but we’d be buggered fitting the games in.

No easy solution.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,241
It's not off just yet.
There will need to be some morning tests of course, but it'd be pretty surprising for it to be on now, and that Palace correspondent and the others who have "checked with sources" would have red faces!!