Ighalo didn’t play and made no difference. Cavani played a little more but was merely a super sub.
We improve the team we still have a goal hanger who’s doesn’t press upfront who most of the fans want to have Thursday nights off.
The ideal solution is improve centre mid, a right winger and a defender this summer.
The way we operate we will let him go out on loan and supplement 50% of his wages next season
this....I couldn't have said it better. Relying on a 37 year old to score most of the goals is frigging crazy.
The point is that if Rashford and Martial were good enough, none of these past-it old players would have been bought. Rashford was better tbh, Martial plain shit before Ronaldo. A combo of Greenwood, Bruno (1st half of the season) and Cavani (at times) helped the team score more goals.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I doubt if it will be PSG. His ego wont be able to handle Mbappe their assistant DOF and main striker.
They brought them because they are stupid mate. It’s the same reason they neglected the CM. Both where stupid signings because we had a reactive manager.
Yes the striker that can’t press and the keeper that looks best when he’s peppered with 30 shots a game.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This. On a game pr game basis Ronaldo wasn't great at all last season. His strong finish with 2 hattricks gives the recency bias that he had a great season but he didn't. Don't care about all of this doesn't deserve us stuff, Juventus fans said the same thing. Now he's 37 and his options are more and more limited
He left after we lost the 2009 cl final. But yeah he agree to leave after we won the CL but stayed for one more year.
There's no point even talking to you. You need to look up what these things mean before you start calling people and ideas names. I'll show you what a straw man is, same way you used one on me by mentioning Dan James. "You are basically saying that signing van Dijk and Allison didn't improve Liverpool? You are saying that it is a correlation/ causation fallacy to suggest Robin van Persie improved us?". Another Straw man, same as yours.
Great post. Great, as in I really agree with all of it
The media's stories are so brilliant that it is worthy of being screened as a film for the Cannes Festival. It is no surprise that they are riding on the "Ronaldo going out" rumour and making up yet another 1+1=2 story.
We'd all have said Sancho would score and set up a lot more goals in his first season too. He didnt. Theres no guarantee Gnabry wouldnt be the same
Well if it’s not the case. We should see him at Chelsea. They could do with a striker.
You guys can seriously do better than to believe this story. I have already said that the media just creates stories based on the general fans sentiment. Rangnick has praised Ronaldo for his attitude and mentality as compared to the other players. You can search it online yourself.
We cannot play ETH football to its best capabilities with a CR7 upfront. You’re concerned about the name. I don’t care about that. I would rather a better functioning team. We was a far better team with a pressing Tony Martial and Bruno scoring all the goals than we are with the two moaning murtles in CR7 and Bruno. He’s turned this all team into a circus like he did with Juventus.
They just let go of one called Lukaku. Why did they let him go if they truly needed a striker?
Not this one, the one which says UtdDistrict as the tweeter.
Huh? I do not know what you are debating here? There striker stunk out the place so now they don’t need a striker because they stuck a midfielder upfront.
Which is based on that story that predates him asking to leave by what is in the world of transfer windows a long time ago.
Thats what I meant by the press building on the "ronaldo wanting out" rumour. They basically spin a more imaginary fairy tale to make people buy into their stories. They do it all the time, especially the multiple "Ole has lost the dressing room" crisis stories starting from 18/19 till 21/22.
