You guys are like a dog with a bone. I really don't see what you see. In half of these clips he's dribbling with the ball full speed, but apparently it's never under his control
Everytime talking to you, all you do is just making statement without giving a clear explanation behind of the statement you made, it looks to me you are just playing a coin tossed or blindly guessing. So let’s give a try again and hopefully I can finally get a clear answer from you why Bruno and Nunez cannot be coached in the team by ETH?
People act like he's got the technique of Titus Bramble but can finish.You guys are like a dog with a bone. I really don't see what you see. In half of these clips he's dribbling with the ball full speed, but apparently it's never under his control
He might not be Berbatov but he sure isn't as bad as people seem to want to make out.
Bruno Fernandes cannot be coached to play possession football. He’s 28 years old and will not change his playing style to be less risk adverse. He can be effective on the wing where he’ll have more space and he can be programmed to hit a specific area in the attacking third.
Maybe it’s you just assume that because someone people say he’s technically poor you automatically think Titus Bramble. Maybe people are looking for the level close to or the potential of Benzema or Lewindoski?
I don't think there are many here saying he's a bad player. Just lacking in elite technique, ball control etc. And that doesn't mean he wouldn't be a good signing, just that we shouldn't be paying elite money for him because he's just not at that level.You guys are like a dog with a bone. I really don't see what you see. In half of these clips he's dribbling with the ball full speed, but apparently it's never under his control
He might not be Berbatov but he sure isn't as bad as people seem to want to make out.
Can't speak for others but I'm just assessing what I see. I'd love him to be world class but I'm not seeing it at the moment. Nkunku, on the other hand, looks a lovely player.
So in order to make this effective we shouldn’t be playing Bruno in the middle/midfield but instead Bruno should be playing on the wing so he can have more space to create chances for Nunez. Isn’t that’s exactly what I told you in my first post that both Bruno and Nunez can be coached together by programmed Bruno on the wing as wide playmaker? And somehow you had this argument telling me that this won’t work because a player with ability to create the most chances in Europe, one of the top xA (expected assist) and most assists in UCL is not playmaker.
Firstly you even watch Football?
I’m not saying he’s a carbon copy, Kane is exceptionally good. I mean a young Kane. The way he runs, the way he carries the ball remind me of young Kane. Not saying that he will develop into him
If his technical ability is not Titus Bramble then Nunez can still be coached to fit in to the system because Haller is also not not technically good but not Bramble level of poor technical.
What shocking me the most in his view on Bruno is that he claimed that Bruno is not playmaker. Top 1 xA in PL last season or top 4 xA in PL this season, most chances created in PL, and most assists in UCL this season is not playmaker?
Is Mo Salah a playmaker? I think that will answer your puzzling Bruno question.
Salah is a winger though. Winger jobs are not just scoring goals but can also create chances. Bruno is not a winger, he is a playmaker. If he’s not playmaker what is he? A winger?
So in my actual post I acknowledged I agreed with you for him to play out wide. Are you just having a stiff back for the sake of it?
Mo Salah is a striker. Don’t believe me ask Thiago. Bruno is an CAM SS. I use to believe he was an 8. But not at this level.
It says ‘’right winger’’.
It says ‘’right winger’’.
Salah has been coached as a winger before he joined Chelsea and developed as a player to be able to play as a striker or wide forward role.
You told me it won’t work so now you are telling me that you agreed with me that it would work and Bruno and Nunez can still be coached to play together under ETH. You seem very lost or what?
Bruno on the wing would work. With Nunez up top. No chance. Too much chaos naturally together they would disjoint our attack. I’m fed up of ugly football aren’t you?
Didn’t I tell you in the same post that Salah is a winger and also has been developed to be able to play different role like wide forward and striker. End of the day he‘s been coached as a winger for years, just like Giggs is a winger but also had been developed to be able to play as CM.
What natural chaos? Please elaborate in football term.
Doesn't have great technique really and looks clumsy on the ball, but he uses his power and pace very well and his finishing is quite good, he is also a hard worker, runs all game, and he is only 22, so he can definitely improve and get better with time, for those reasons I like him as ST option next season, and if ETH wants him, then we should get him.wow such poor technique
What poor hold up play
The new Lukaku?
You did. But what does that mean to me now? Right now he’s am inverted striker with average balling ability score and assisting at a world class level. But to answer my original point. It doesn’t make him a playmaker. However to link the two what Salah offers we can probably get from Nunez which might be why ETH wants him.
You cant compare Giggs who played wide left in a 442 to Salah on the right in a 433.
You keep asking me to elaborate on stuff like I’m Tifo.. bro we all have a basic level of football understanding. If you told me X player can’t pass I wouldnt ask you to explain what technical differences he has for this to be true.
I’m not comparing him to Giggs. I’m using him as an example of a player can also developed to play different positions.
It means that Salah has been coached as a winger longer than as a striker and wide forward, thus, he’s not going to just forget how to create chances all of sudden.
That’s fine. No problem in your Salah analysis but it doesn’t answer what I asked you. I asked you would you say Mo Salah is a playmaker for Liverpool?
I already told you he’s a winger, winger can create chances and also can score goal. Do you not know that winger and playmaker is different?
Was Iniesta or Zidane a playmaker?
You don't have to be a great technician on the ball to be a great footballer, Vieri for example wasn't known to have a great technique but he was one of Europe's top strikers during his prime. Nunez's technique isn't bad at all, not as good as your Benzemas & Lewandowskis nowadays, but I think he has the potential to succeed here as he possess a lot of great qualities as a 22 yo striker.Agreed with you there.
Debate ended hopefully! Probably not though some people take a marathon to catch up.
Not every striker should be coached to drop deep all the time to link up play. And that’s why Haller who is not technically gifted is not used for the role and ETH was still able to fit him in. And that’s why I have been using him as an example.
What do you characterise as technique can I ask? what is it you think he is bad at?
I think we would mostly use him as the work horse to Ronaldo's static-ness. I doubt he'd play CF, probably right side.
Iniesta and Zidane were playmaker just like Bruno. Salah isn’t playmaker. I never say all playmakers play 10, otherwise I wouldn’t mention ‘’wide playmaker’‘ in one of my post. Your point?Was Iniesta or Zidane a playmaker?
I can see this getting a bit tricky.
Just to clarify. It might be different to others but a playmaker is not a position on the football field. They tend to normally be number 10’s. But I wouldn’t say all playmakers play 10.
