Yeah. You really believed that? How stupid are you?
Donald Trump - All things impeachment.... | Acquitted in the Senate
- Thread starter Pexbo
- Start date
- Status
Trump was absolutely right when he said, he could shoot people and get away with it.
Republicans would be out there defending it.
"What do you mean its a crime?". "Trump just shot those people who would have gone to jail in any case", "saved tax payers money, that's not a crime"
Most Transparent presidency in history
Whatever happened to that big-eared cnut?
it just gets better. He literally said “yeah we do corruption all the time” not realising that it’s an actual admittance of guilt of something absolutely illegal... you know... “corruption”. Like, it’s completely illegal and he just outright said they do it all the time.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
A bunch of criminal conspirators with unlimited resources at their disposals that cant even get their stories together
'Everyone does it.'
South Carolina delivers again
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Only now? Ffs, shameless cnut. Is he planning another run at the Presidency?
#GetOverIt
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Keep going Mulvaney. Get him on every news channel possible and just let him talk.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Yeah, I am not getting my hopes up. Trump could confess that he had a quid pro quo and it still wont matter to the people and the GOP.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Trump's use of racially inflammatory language today would completely unrelated presumably 
So far it seems it doesn't matter to the Dems either. This must be the 100th time one of them has emerged from an "explosive" testimony and hinted that Trump's reign of terror is about to end, and then nothing happens.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Giuliani, Perry, and Mulvaney all implicated and he says the orders came directly from Trump.
Bolton angrily ended a meeting and called it a "drug deal"
And now Barr involved on page 9...
Sondland so fecked, if the world still had any repercussions for actions.
A hypothetical question for the law afficianados, supposing this inquiry doesn't result in anything and a democratic president is elected in 20, do you think they can charge these crooks in a different way?
Absolutely. They’ve investigated and declined to bring charges so far. There’s no double jeopardy protection when no charges have been brought.
That bananas part...
Smearing campaign against Taylor in 3...2..
This is one reason I don't want the impeachment inquiry to finish before the election and Trump to either be removed or him to resign. This would mean the substitute president will likely pardon him.
Double jeopardy is irrelevant in this regard. This is a political process, not a legal one.
I assume by “these crooks” he’s referring to more than just Trump. The likes of Barr, Giuliani, Perry, Mulvaney, Mnunchin, Pompeo from this saga and many many others from the Mueller report and various other court cases Trump has against him right now. All of these will be open to criminal charges at some point. This senate isn’t going to be convicting them as part of this political process. A Democrat AG could open their own criminal inquiry and criminal charges could come from that.
Suspect there will be quite a lot of people “forgetting” things.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Pelosi has still not called for an inquiry vote. Absolute weapon.
What good will that do at this point?
They have the votes, but it’s a political process and they are still milking it for all it’s worth. And from the look of it, there are some left in this cow yet.
- Status