Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Elon Musk | Owner of X
- Thread starter Pogue Mahone
- Start date
Well that’s speculation. We can only go by what was released.
I would state the obvious here but I’ll keep quiet.
Remember all these right wing business interest groups did so well under Trump that while they didn't want to support him publicly, they absolutely loved him and supported him as they were cleaning up.
Remember it was Hilary's emails. Now it's Biden's laptop, soon it'll be Kamala Harris's sneakers. It's all a play to get the GOP back in power because they need more money!
They can't innovate, invent or actually create anything of value, so it's easier to push their candidate back into power who will reduce their taxes, reduce labour regulations and safety standards so they can make more money.
If these money groups drag racist, homophobic, misogynist Nazis along with them, it's a price worth paying (for us).
Remember it was Hilary's emails. Now it's Biden's laptop, soon it'll be Kamala Harris's sneakers. It's all a play to get the GOP back in power because they need more money!
They can't innovate, invent or actually create anything of value, so it's easier to push their candidate back into power who will reduce their taxes, reduce labour regulations and safety standards so they can make more money.
If these money groups drag racist, homophobic, misogynist Nazis along with them, it's a price worth paying (for us).
That was released, Taibbi doesn't discuss it because this is to get the Dems out of power.
That's not speculation, the tweet thread specifically says requests were also handled for the Trump team but conveniently doesn't say a word about it.
You wrote yourself "it was an agenda driven action. That as much was clear." There's nothing "clear" about it unless we have a complete overview of the request process for both Biden and Trump teams. And while I obviously agree Twitter used to be a left leaning company, considering that anything is "clear" while Musks data dump IS obviously an agenda driven action is lazy at best.
So NOW we are accusing Twitter of aiding the right? Without evidence of such? Who’s worse the ones with actual evidence of the opposite or the ones without.
I think she's just warning him that she's going to drive
?I would state the obvious here but I’ll keep quiet.
Ah but at the time Twitter was owned by Marxists who were lying, now it's owned by Elon we can finally get the truth.
Trump would have demanded all copies be sent straight to him for 'verification and disposal'
Must be killing musk that trumps truthing his meltdown rather than tweeting
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/109449803240069864
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/109449803240069864
What's the obvious?I would state the obvious here but I’ll keep quiet.
Yeah, or how the vast majority of the press in the UK suppress stories that paint the tories in a bad light while running with anti-Labour/Corbyn stuff in the run up to elections. It's what themedia has done for decades.
He let Trump back on because he knows how much traffic he drove to Twitter when he was still on.
Yes and I'm pretty sure the whole hunter leaks thing was designed (and failed) to get trump back tweeting rather than truthing
This is fecking boring now. Hope Twitter dies quickly sick of hearing about Musk.
Well? Go ahead a spit it out.I would state the obvious here but I’ll keep quiet.
I bet the answer will be as disappointing as the Musk reveal last night.
Can't wait for number 2 tonight. .
The funniest thing has been the half arsed response from the far right. Even they know it's a nothingburger but feel they must at least say something
Do you need MORE drama???
Problem is with the lack of quality of drama, not the quantity.
To be honest, it is the first time that i like trump sticking to his guns and frustrate elon shitty plan
Yeah if somebody had told me in 2012 I'd back trump over Elon I'd have been shocked
His transformation from iron man to space Karen really has been quite rapid
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Hope Elon has his lawyers ready for when someone takes action
Musk is a dystopian villain. The fact that he's the richest man in the world is a damning indictment of the world.
Emerald mine heir
Multiple companies (twitter tesla spacex starlink the ai stuff and tunneling)
Personally I can't see any way that works together other than sending ai controlled monkeys to Mars to dig tunnels they can live in so they can drive their tesla buggies to work to tweet via starling that musks enemies are peados outside of any earth regulation.
He's basically a really bad bond villain
He knows it was Trump’s government at the time, right?
It's a shame he's so badly written too.
Presumably that's been up long enough to assume that it's ok to tweet
Next election is going to be awful
This is aimed at an audience who won’t care about these things.
I’m reminded of one of those Jordan Klepper vs Trump supporters videos where they were asking why “Obama wasn’t even in the Oval Office on 9/11”.
Unfortunately (in this case), Musk would be fully protected by the 1st amendment as he is not directly inciting for imminent lawless action. Even Abdirahman's tweet is very likely protected since it's merely general advocacy for violence, which is protected speech.
That's why Tucker Carlson is free the spew his nonsense on TV.
You just spawned thousands of Elon Musk fan fiction works, you fool!
i'm not talking about the successful defense of 1st amendment legal action against them. I'm saying that the potential for violence egged on by these kinds of statements are just lawsuits waiting to happen. He does not need to keep these kinds of posts up, but he does because it suits a narrative.
@Oly Francis I read your post before you deleted or was deleted. i am talking about lawsuits brought against Musk/twitter/ Abdirahman like those brought against Alex Jones. I'm simply calling him stupid for keeping those kinds of posts up when deleting them could solve "potential" future headaches. Simply saying he could save himself potential legal headaches. Not talking about whether he'd win, what 1st amendment legal defense he would have etc. I'm just calling him stupid for leaving up a stupid post.
I'm not sure what we are really debating here.
I'm not sure what we are really debating here.
I deleted it because I realized I misunderstood your answer my bad!@Oly Francis I read your post before you deleted or was deleted. i am talking about lawsuits brought against Musk/twitter/ Abdirahman like those brought against Alex Jones. I'm simply calling him stupid for keeping those kinds of posts up when deleting them could solve "potential" future headaches. Simply saying he could save himself potential legal headaches. Not talking about whether he'd win, what 1st amendment legal defense he would have etc. I'm just calling him stupid for leaving up a stupid post.
I'm not sure what we are really debating here.
all good, hope i didn't come across as pissy, just confused about what we were discussing.