Erik ten Hag - Manchester United manager / awaiting clarity from the club over his position

Should ETH be kept on or fired by INEOS


  • Total voters
    2,032
  • Poll closed .

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
7,097
He's reached the point where he's trying to disconnect himself from the failures. While doing so, he's blaming everything and everyone and bringing up United's past 'failings'(him bringing up our 2004-2005 season as an equivalent to this side was hilarious) to try and absolve his own failings. It's pathetic.
Carrick was objectively better, and he's not good enough. He was night and say compared to hag.
 

evil_geko

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2005
Messages
5,985
What's with the copium that the 7-0 was a freak result? ETH set the whole team up wrongly from the get go and every vulnerability was exposed
Copium? Anyone with eyes can tell you that game was freakiest result in decades. From the get go? We literally matched Liverpool in the first half, did you even watch the fecking game? Only copium is using that game over and over as some sort of sign for things to come. You can use tons of other games for that, that Liverpool game is not it.
 

Mainoonited

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2023
Messages
244
Its unbelievable that people are still arguing for him to remain as manager.

Yeah we had some injuries but we had 7 first team players playing in their regular spots.

SAF once beat Arsenal with a midfield of Rafael, Gibson, O'Shea, Fabio (yes i did have to google the exact line up).
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,508
Location
Where the grass is greener.
There is nothing wrong with his post though, we do have to move on and not go back to the ole way.
Why would we go back to the Ole way? The Ole way wasn't even a real way anyway, it was literally go out just do it stuff, we're obviously going to be aiming for better than that though.
 

TrebleChamp99

Supports Liverpool
Joined
Dec 27, 2021
Messages
1,166
If you still want ETH you are will-fully ignorant.
Time isn’t infinite , make the change now and stop pissing about waiting for executives to come in.

INEOS need to be decisive here.
 

RedorDead21

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
9,218
When we signed him he was the standout candidate. It was a good move at the time. He has since gone on to prove that he’s not up to it, so he should be replaced. No different to us signing Schneiderlin. It is entirely sensible to change your views as time goes by.

Your post is really not the “gotcha” moment you think it is
we would 100% of got rid of Arteta also so it’s not like whatever we do now will be the right move…
 

Adz_99

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 18, 2024
Messages
330
What's with the copium that the 7-0 was a freak result? ETH set the whole team up wrongly from the get go and every vulnerability was exposed
At the time that game was a weird blot on an otherwise decent season. Keep in mind we were 10 points clear of Liverpool at the time and still in the hunt for 3 trophies.

In hindsight it was a sign of things to come but at at the time I felt like an absolute 1 in 1000 freak result.
 

JeffFromHK

Full Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2021
Messages
1,118
When he played our First XI in a league cup against championship side after World Cup 2022 "We are Man Utd, we must win every game"
When we have lost the 13th league game this season "It is ONLY our 4th defeat this calendar year, not a lot"

what a jerk
 

Tom Van Persie

No relation
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
25,185
Pretty sure they won't sack him until season's end.

Hopefully we somehow fluke a result vs City, but they might demolish us yet again in all likelihood.
Yeah I don't think they will sack him yet but you never know after a defeat like that. The cup final has kept him in the job these last few weeks. Win or lose he's gone after that.
 

AngeloHenriquez

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
13,587
Location
Location Location
Supports
Stevenage
I'd have more faith in him if he admitted how awful we are but the fact he doesn't seem to recognise how awful we are kills me.

Yes we have injuries but we still have enough international players on the pitch to not look like a sunday league team.
 

Von Mistelroum

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2015
Messages
4,172
I wonder if we just can't afford to sack him. We're broke and he might get a big payout that we're not aware of.
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
7,097
Why would we go back to the Ole way? The Ole way wasn't even a real way anyway, it was literally go out just do it stuff, we're obviously going to be aiming for better than that though.
I think he was talking about the fact that we have players who suit that, and not a more modern style. I think the argument was about not deciding the style based on the players you have.
 

Djemba-Djemba

Full Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
21,566
Location
Manchester
He's reached the point where he's trying to disconnect himself from the failures. While doing so, he's blaming everything and everyone and bringing up United's past 'failings'(him bringing up our 2004-2005 season as an equivalent to this side was hilarious) to try and absolve his own failings. It's pathetic.
This was utterly bizarre behaviour by him.

Especially as the 04/05 team finished 3rd with a GD of 32 and 23 more points than this lot. They're not equivalent at all, the 04/05 side would smash the current side to pieces and that wasn't even a vintage Utd side.

Like you said, when a manager starts to disconnect himself for the failure and starts bringing up their own individual records you know it's almost game over.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
32,147
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Its unbelievable that people are still arguing for him to remain as manager.

Yeah we had some injuries but we had 7 first team players playing in their regular spots.

SAF once beat Arsenal with a midfield of Rafael, Gibson, O'Shea, Fabio (yes i did have to google the exact line up).
Poor Ten Hag had to play Casemiro in defence once. We lost 4-0 to Palace...
 

AbusementPark

Operates the Unfairest Wheel
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
2,641
Location
Belfast
Does it have to work? Ten Hag isn't working so what damage could McClaren do for 3 games? People talking like an interim is impossible because it's only October. Just sack the clown and start looking for new managers to hire in the summer. The longer you wait the less time you have to recruit.
No doesn’t have to work out having an interim for the last few games but I think it will do more harm than good to the drama around the club, we have enough drama ongoing at the club without adding this to the list. Seems like a weak mentality but I’m sure INEOS have wrote the season off and are working in the background on the replacement. Seems most likely that Tuchel and Ten Hag will swap positions over the summer, which is bizarre given how poorly Ten Hag has done at United.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,923
Yes it is a shit show, but literally every manager who has come in has met with the same fate. There is no escape. These players aren't going to turn up just cause we get someone interim. They will half ass it cause they know this manager will leave too.
Every manager has their own starting 11 and core players. It's just lazy excuse to use "these players"
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
87,384
Does anyone actually know the situation regarding his potential sacking compensation?

For example is it actually substantially less payout if we sack him end of the season versus now?
 

justboy68

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
7,764
Location
Manchester
When we signed him he was the standout candidate. It was a good move at the time. He has since gone on to prove that he’s not up to it, so he should be replaced. No different to us signing Schneiderlin. It is entirely sensible to change your views as time goes by.

Your post is really not the “gotcha” moment you think it is
Thinking of coaches in a similar way to players is actually a very useful analogy because it also helps us see one step further. Coaches, like players, are also not static in a good or bad, black and white kind of way. It's entirely possible to be a good coach one year and then a bad coach a few years later. That kind of thinking almost never enters the debate when talking about coaches, yet when talking about players it is immediately obvious and understanding it is taken for granted. For example, Dele Alli. Clearly a good player at one point and then due to numerous reasons he wasn't cut out for the top level anymore. Players can even go up, down and back up again if they sort themselves out/rediscover lost motivation or adapt their game etc and again it can apply to coaches too.

Ten Hag for example could have been a good coach at Ajax, a bad coach while here this season and there is a chance that he will potentially come good again with a different environment and a fresh start. I do doubt he will have success afterwards, but I wouldn't be so arrogant as to say I can predict the future with certainty, so of course there's a chance.

A counter argument might then be, if you think there is a chance he can be a good coach again then why not give him the chance to turn his fortunes around here? I reckon that turning things around without a change of environment is even more difficult and extremely rare and it would be reckless to hang the hopes of the club on that slim possibility. Again you could say the same for many players who have been at a club for 2 years. Why believe Ten Hag can turn it around but that Casemiro can't? Their length of service at United and their performances at United are almost perfectly aligned, yet absolutely no one has any problem with getting rid of the player. In fact, hanging our midfield hopes on Casemiro rediscovering his form and not bringing in a replacement would be seen as the ridiculous idea.
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
7,097
But the manager who is employed today needs to get the best out of the players he has, not play a system that none of the players can play to, lose 17 games in a single season and finish 8th because he needs 11 new players and 3 seasons before we can start winning games.
Well a manager can't just manage any style of football, they have their style that they specialise in. If the club didn't want it then they shouldn't hire him, would you ask Pep to play a defensive counter attacking style? He wouldn't and he wouldn't be good at it.

Also you gotta think the process to move to a more modern style takes time, and multiple transfer windows so you might as well start asap. Though he's not done a great job with that tbh.
 

Roboc7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
6,739
I don’t understand why anyone objects to an interim being brought in. We probably still don’t finish the season very well but it’s at least making an attempt to finish in a European position and have some sort of attempt at a plan in the Cup Final.

Sticking with a manager who is completely finished at the club and just writing the remaining games off (and consequently European football next season) is the alternative. We’ve passed the point now where anyone can even pretend he has a chance of being here next season let alone being here to oversee 2-3 years of rebuilding.
 

Gavinb33

Full Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
2,917
Location
Watching the TV or is it watching me
Palace could've scored more last night if they wanted to. They took pity on us.
Agreed when they started to take all their players off but then still created chance after chance

I'd have more faith in him if he admitted how awful we are but the fact he doesn't seem to recognise how awful we are kills me.

Yes we have injuries but we still have enough international players on the pitch to not look like a sunday league team.
I mean he did take responsibility to be fair "I will keep fighting and I prepared the team in the best way I could do and it was not good enough, by far not good enough.

I have to take the responsibility for that, but I will find energy and I will prepare them for Sunday's game."

There is a lot he is bad at but generally he says he needs to do better just some ignore it and focus on other things he says, having said that the quote is from an article saying we are the worst coached team in the league and it's hard to disagree with that
 

Robbie Boy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
28,546
Location
Dublin
ETH has a much better set of players and they're still conceding loads of chances per game. Pretty sure our defensive metrics are up there with Sheffield United.

If he had that Sheffield United team, they'd probably break records for the amount of chances they'd concede.
Mate, we're comparing who is worse coached, SU who are bottom of the league and have conceded 100 goals or, the current Manchester United manager. Does it really matter? :lol:

Imo, SU are worse coached than us. Only by virtue of them being slightly more terribly coached.
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
7,097
I'm expecting an absolute gutting of this squad in the summer to be fair, so its a non issue.
We can only hope, but it's going to take multiple transfer windows before we make big progress, we can only spend so much.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
32,147
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Well a manager can't just manage any style of football, they have their style that they specialise in. If the club didn't want it then they shouldn't hire him, would you ask Pep to play a defensive counter attacking style? He wouldn't and he wouldn't be good at it.

Also you gotta think the process to move to a more modern style takes time, and multiple transfer windows so you might as well start asap. Though he's not done a great job with that tbh.
No, shite managers have their style and specialise in it. Good managers have an idea and adapt it to the players they have available.

This is the problem, Pep has warped everyone's opinion on how managers should be because he's had limitless funds and permission to buy and sell absolutely anyone on a whim. It's not a model that's replicable.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,414
Does anyone actually know the situation regarding his potential sacking compensation?

For example is it actually substantially less payout if we sack him end of the season versus now?
IF there is any credence to the Tuchel - Ten Hag swap rumours, I'd imagine it means no compensation required for Ten Hag to leave United for Bayern, but I'd also imagine that it would step up in momentum post cup exits
 

adkb

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
291
If I were INEOS, I would put Rashford for sale. Send a clear msg.
Under what circumstances would sacking ETH be reasonable in your mind? Surely there has to be some kind of performance expectation right? Also do you acknowledge that the majority of the players who played yesterday have only played for this first team under ETH? Why aren't they worthy of the same benefit of the doubt that you are giving the manager. I think the manager and players should be held to the same standard, if the players aren't getting a pass then the manager shouldn't either. If players fail move them on, if managers fail move them on too. Is that really an unreasonable or ridiculous view point?

On the INEOS point, I agree it's way too early to be judging their competency one way or the other. For all we know they could be doing anything from arranging a deal with Bayern to save us money from sacking Ten Hag, or signing up Southgate for the job like utter morons, we simply don't know yet.
If next season we still do not improve then I would be okay with his sacking that being said I would hope the club signs new young dynamic players through a detailed process by competent people, we get rid of players with EGOs, players with no legs and deadwood.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,706
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
He only cares about his own reputation at this point as he knows he's gone, how anyone can see it differently I don't know.
I don't think so, otherwise he wouldn't continually set us up like this. This is clearly damaging his reputation more than leaving, I'm at a loss as to what everyone is playing at - the coach, players, footballing structure.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,993
Location
London
Does anyone actually know the situation regarding his potential sacking compensation?

For example is it actually substantially less payout if we sack him end of the season versus now?
We can only speculate, but I think every manager had a clause that if they do not reach UCL the compensation is significantly lower. We sacked Moyes I think within 24 hours of mathematically being unable to reach UCL, and LvG after the FA Cup (a few days after being unable to reach UCL), despite that everyone knew that he is going to get sacked.

I do not know what can it be for EtH considering that he is in the last year of contract anyway. For Moyes, it was one year payout instead of paying up his entire contract.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,706
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
IF there is any credence to the Tuchel - Ten Hag swap rumours, I'd imagine it means no compensation required for Ten Hag to leave United for Bayern, but I'd also imagine that it would step up in momentum post cup exits
Hala Madrid.
 

AngeloHenriquez

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
13,587
Location
Location Location
Supports
Stevenage
Agreed when they started to take all their players off but then still created chance after chance



I mean he did take responsibility to be fair "I will keep fighting and I prepared the team in the best way I could do and it was not good enough, by far not good enough.

I have to take the responsibility for that, but I will find energy and I will prepare them for Sunday's game."

There is a lot he is bad at but generally he says he needs to do better just some ignore it and focus on other things he says, having said that the quote is from an article saying we are the worst coached team in the league and it's hard to disagree with that
Game before this he tried telling us how exciting we are to watch and how we are dynamic and create so many chances, it's rubbish. We lost 4 nil to Palace and it could have been more easily and he says "It's not good enough", that's an understatement of the year.

I want to know what he is going to do to correct it, last year after the awful start he identified fitness and went on extra runs etc and did it with them to improve their fitness, I loved that. He seems downtroden and a shadow of his former self.
 

adkb

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
291
Its unbelievable that people are still arguing for him to remain as manager.

Yeah we had some injuries but we had 7 first team players playing in their regular spots.

SAF once beat Arsenal with a midfield of Rafael, Gibson, O'Shea, Fabio (yes i did have to google the exact line up).
oh great. SAF did it with Gibson so it must be easy as feck.

Winning games in 2024 is different than winning them back then. Things have changed, mentality has changed, our players havent.
 

AndySmith1990

Full Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Messages
6,467
That's a few million less we can spend.
What would be the point of spending a few million more on transfers when we'd have Ten Hag managing them? It'd be like paying more for a faster race car only to have Susan Boyle drive it. Replacing Ten Hag with a great head coach who can get a team performing above the sum of its parts would be worth more to us than any new signing.
 

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
6,936
Supports
Hannover 96
A managerial swap would be a first ever, right?
Doing it directly at the same time probably yes, at least I can't remember anything like it. In the space of a few weeks yes - Hoffenheim and Stuttgart did it last season. Both were fighting against relegation, now Stuttgart is already qualified for the CL and fighting Bayern for 2nd place, and Hoffenheim still is in the mix to qualify for EL/ECL.