City can get Kane this summer. FFP is calculated on the previous season's spend. So City will need to ensure by the end of next season that they have got themselves back within the FFP guidelines for spending.
Erling Haaland
- Thread starter Samid
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik @Rood and Imran @Annihilate Now! start with the good news by celebrating Manchester United Women's emphatic FA Cup win over Spurs at Wembley and the future of manager Marc Skinner.
Then it's the bad news and the ever worsening form of our Men with losses to Arsenal and Palace.
Finally the main debate - ETH Out now or keep him until the end of the season - if not longer. Are you Team Nik or Team Imran?
- Status
I honestly do feel Haaland will struggle moving to the Prem, even in La Liga I could see him struggling.
So Chelsea won't be signing him. £150m on Werner and Lukaku rules them out. Doubt Haaland would have been interested in the move and probably made that clear this summer.
Kane still on the shelf. If he goes probably City.
Where's he going? If it's the PL United seems likely.
Kane still on the shelf. If he goes probably City.
Where's he going? If it's the PL United seems likely.
Break the bank
United literally should go in now and pay £100m and guarantee this player at Old Trafford
Long term, he would make us a lot of revenue and still in 6 years have potential re-sale value also.
Long term, he would make us a lot of revenue and still in 6 years have potential re-sale value also.
Why?
Why did Chesea withdraw out of a sudden?
They went with cheaper option
I think they are just desperate for a new striker this season.
I’m glad they are out of the race for him now.
There will still be a lot of clubs in for him next season at £60m price tag regardless who they buy this season.
Unless he has guaranteed to join United, I'd pay the £100m now.
United's biggest issue is being unable to offload the deadwood.
Clubs want our players but seem to expect to have them for free or very little. Big problem for us.
Unless he has guaranteed to join United, I'd pay the £100m now.
United's biggest issue is being unable to offload the deadwood.
Clubs want our players but seem to expect to have them for free or very little. Big problem for us.
No they're not.
Why are people talking in here like Haaland is going to be cheap and affordable? A £60m release clause just means that Dortmund will get paid a fraction of his worth. The money 'saved' will just go back to the player and agent. He will still cost more than any other player in the world not called Messi and his salary will be something crazy. I predict it will be in the region of £60m to £100m a year.
They realized Dortmund would fleece them for a world record fee.
Pay 100m to who and for who? Can't be for Haaland. Dortmund isn't gonna accept that.
Why would you pay £100m when next summer his release clause is around £75m?
If we want him (and can afford it), he's ours.
I'm not going to disclose any sources and I have no way of verifying this but I've heard from the Jamaican delegation that:
- Haaland has a "gentleman's agreement" with United.
- His agent is very keen to establish a relationship with United and after the Ibrahimovic deal, United are comfortable working with his agent.
- Uniteds finance /sales teams are already estimating his impact on sales and costs on next years finances (the usual projections or 3-5 year plans that every company does).
How not? They're just about to sign Lukaku for about £97M. You are not exactly signing a striker for a shit ton of money like that to then have the mindset to think about putting them on the bench 12 months later.
they already turned down more than £100m from Chelsea
Haaland will be available for £60m Chelsea will sell Warner and half their reserves anyday to get him
Jamaican some convincing arguments here. It's ON, mon.
Because everyone will be able to afford him then.
Clearly no one can afford him now. Apart from possibly us, if we actually stopped giving money to Phil Jones every hour and sold some players.
Think he goes to Bayern (or Madrid if they can sell/raise the cash).
Would say Bayern as well, but just can't see them sign a Raiola player.
Dortmund are Charging 150m this year.
So what do they do with Lukaku? You are not exactly going to be spending £97M on one player to have the mindset of benching them 12 months later unless you are gonna think about moving them on which I extremely doubt that is the case as it’ll just be a stupid move to sign him in the 1st place. I don’t think Lukaku would even be thinking about joining them if that’s what they are planning. He will want to go there and play every week. The same thing Haaland will want at his next club. I seriously doubt neither of them will want to be a backup to the other.
its chelsea and Roman, if they aren't happy with him they will dump him the Mediterranean Sea like they did Morata and eat the loss. Don't count Chelsea out yet.
Mbappe to Madrid
.
City or us.
Bayern bound. City won't sign him .
Bayern won't pay Raiola what he wants
I bet Real Madrid will get Haaland and Mbappe next summer. Maybe even Pogba?
I doubt Haaland wanted to go.
Isn't his agent raiola
Now that Messi and Ronaldo are gone we do need to get Haaland and Mbappe to play for the best team in the world. 
Yes, they are
Going to get him
- Status