I think the situation of Pogba with United is what led to someone like Haaland having a release clause on his contract.Except Pogba is an example of that not happening.
That's the dream.Lord help Europe if Madrid find a way to pair him with fecking Mbappe next summer
Fixed it for you.I would be surprised if he doesn't join City. Excellent state sponsored neverending oil money supply sporting project and has an opening for striker as well.
Real Madrid could definitely afford Haaland's wage because of expiring contracts of Bale, Marcelo etc. next year. But like I said, they don't need Haaland since Benzema is still in his primeI think Mbappe would be a factor too as he would be highly paid. Haaland would surely ask for same range of money. (expect up to 1 million pre-tax wage per week), even Real would find it hard to afford both players at the same time (remember they can't afford to buy Pogba last summer, as they need to reserve fund for Mbappe). Imagine it would cost Real 270m to pay for Mbappe 5 years wage, and another 270m for Haaland 5 years wage. This is the exact kind of money which broke Barca financially.
Lewandowksi has far better numbers than Haaland in BL over past 3 seasons, and he actually did win something major - more BL titles, and of course CL trophy too. Hence I have no problems on rating him highly.
Pep hasn't said next year is his last. And pretty sure he'd fancy City Pep or no Pep.didn't Pep say next year was his last season? why would he want to go there if Pep is only going to be around the end of 2022
Very possible but I really hope we do not fall for it and plan for a future based around a team ethos and not superstar signings with leeches for agents. On a side note I have been loving all of the dippers bashing United on twitter because Raiola said we were not a big club who seem to be blissfully unaware that by saying City is the only PL club in it Raiola has shat all over Anfield. Never change dippers, your delusion is delicious.Railoa is 100% just baiting us to cough up more money. Haaland is a future red, mark my words. Pogba also stays.
I tend to agree with the first point it has really been a weakness of ours for a long time (superstar individual vs well coached team). That said I feel like you can make exceptions when the superstar in question is a goalscorer. Very hard to coach that at all and you rarely get the chance to sign one like Haaland. Has to be done.Very possible but I really hope we do not fall for it and plan for a future based around a team ethos and not superstar signings with leeches for agents. On a side note I have been loving all of the dippers bashing United on twitter because Raiola said we were not a big club who seem to be blissfully unaware that by saying City is the only PL club in it Raiola has shat all over Anfield. Never change dippers, your delusion is delicious.
Stay away from the water hippo at all costs. Hopefully we've seen the last of him when pogba fecks off in a couple of months.He could become the next GOAT but as long as he is with Raiola he is a double edged sword.
I'd agree with you - if it wasn't for the fact Benzema is their best player & shows no signs of declining.I really don't understand why Haaland would consider United. He doesn't seem money driven, he seems driven by records and being the best, and has no allegiances (in fact negative allegiances with his Leeds/City links).
He's going to have the best chance to win trophies and set records at either Bayern, City or Real as it stands, maybe PSG as a fourth option. I don't know why Barcelona were name dropped as it seems incredibly unlikely he'd join them in their current state (or that they could afford him).
The fact Raiola has said Bayern can't afford Pogba suggests they'd struggle with Haaland too, therefore I suspect it will be Madrid or City; City currently have the obvious opening for him, and I've no doubt Madrid would be ruthless and cut Benzema for him. He's much more a typical Madrid signing and very much not a typical City signing, and what a statement getting Mbappe and Haaland for around £60m would be.
Yeah that Italian motormouth will make it happen after having a cheap pop at usI would be surprised if he doesn't join City. Excellent sporting project and has an opening for striker as well.
It will have signing on fees and etc. It will be definitely much more than 60 mil. Their salary will also be much higher after factored in everything.statement getting Mbappe and Haaland for around £60m would be.
Man Utd, Real Madrid, Barcelona and Bayern Munich are definitely on par as one of the biggest club in the world.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This fat virus thinks football started in 2012?
Agree with the whole Raiola and his circus bit. Signing Haaland would mean definite goals but definite drama every other year.Not too fussed about him any longer after the circus we saw with Pogba. I don't want another scenario at United like that. There will be other potentially good strikers around.
Some of statements are openly disrespectful to a team that employees some of his clients. It's borderline unprofessional and never ceases to provide a reminder as to why we ought to steer clear.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This fat virus thinks football started in 2012?
In all honesty, who do City have who comes across as that unlikeable? They’ve got such a bland team of players who seem totally lacking in personality to me.Unlikable cnut, would fit in well at Citeh.
It's never that simple. Alan Shearer and Ruud van Nistelrooy have two league titles between them. Cristiano Ronaldo has two La Liga titles.If City get him, the league is theirs until he leaves.
The owners themselves are loathsome, so much to the point that they completely sucked the soul out of the local rivalry.In all honesty, who do City have who comes across as that unlikeable? They’ve got such a bland team of players who seem totally lacking in personality to me.
Until Pep leaves…the wheels will come off then……and it will start to fall apart…..tough job going in after Pep - and I’m not sure who apart from the 2 oil clubs can really accommodate the demands of Mino for this transfer - makes you laugh he mentions Barca as they haven’t got a pot to piss in!If City get him, the league is theirs until he leaves.
This is why i think that the fact Raiola tried to put us (United) down by bigging up a team like Barcelona makes me feel like we are quite strong in the league to get him in my opinion.Until Pep leaves…the wheels will come off then……and it will start to fall apart…..tough job going in after Pep - and I’m not sure who apart from the 2 oil clubs can really accommodate the demands of Mino for this transfer - makes you laugh he mentions Barca as they haven’t got a pot to piss in!
Yeah of course, I'm just talking transfer fees. Considering they were willing to spend somewhere around £150m for Mbappe last season suggest they have plenty of cash to play with now that they'll get him for free.It will have signing on fees and etc. It will be definitely much more than 60 mil. Their salary will also be much higher after factored in everything.
He's 33 and they love a big name signing even if its not necessary, I'll hope you're right as I'm of course hoping for Haaland at City, but for me Madrid is the most likely destination.I'd agree with you - if it wasn't for the fact Benzema is their best player & shows no signs of declining.
If Real Madrid weren't ruthless to cut Benzema in 2018 despite his abysmal 5 LaLiga goals in 32 games, it won't happen next year.
City just wanted a striker last season and Haaland wasn't available, Kane was the best option that seemed attainable at the time, hence the consideration of Ronaldo after the Kane deal fell through - thankfully neither of those things happened. Next window we're in the same situation, clearly still in need of a striker, and have one of the best in the world available at around 1/3 the transfer fee of what was being quoted for Kane.It just seems a bit weird for Pep to go from wanting Kane to then wanting Haaland.
But at the same time, I don't think Pep is here for much longer and maybe just go for it to try something new and help his CL chances.
100%.Can we please stay away from Raiola's clients?
Mendes is way worse.100%.
I have never seen a football agent that is so annoying and disruptive. He is constantly showing blatant disregard to the clubs that employ his clients.
Mendes is an angle compared to this Raiola cnut.
How?Mendes is way worse.