What the hell? To me that chance looks more like 0.99 xG. As in you expect to score that 99 times out of 100.
Does VAR not take the goalkeeper position into account? Useless stat if not.
But that's based on your own (armchair) subjectivity.
The numbers say that 87% of shots at that location have been scored.
Some VAR models take goalkeeper position into account, but even if they don't, it's not a useless stat, because the number would represent the average possibility of shots at that point, whether a goalkeeper was there or not.
The value of xG is not in absolute determinations, it's in relative determinations. No one cares about the exact xG of Haaland's chance except xG pedants, but the xG model recognizes that in a specific framework, Haaland was more of a high quality chance than the first Foden goal, and a lot of good insights can be derived in this framework.