MancunianAngels
Full Member
Through to the 1st round of the FA Trophy
Well that was exciting! Great stuff. Although, I still get weird feelings about the concept of FCUoM. There'll only be one United for me.
Through to the 1st round of the FA Trophy
The formation of both clubs were under very different circumstances to be fair. I would like to think not, because no FCUM fans want United to fail, or deny the validity of MUFC. They remain supporters of Manchester United Football Club, celebrate their success and want the club to be successful. They just refuse to line the pockets of the owners...and have decided that, as long standing supporters of their football club, they have been ignored too long.Well that was exciting! Great stuff. Although, I still get weird feelings about the concept of FCUoM. There'll only be one United for me.
It's a great concept. Fan owned football club, family orientated with affordable tickets and a good atmosphere.Well that was exciting! Great stuff. Although, I still get weird feelings about the concept of FCUoM. There'll only be one United for me.
I often wonder myself, I don't think there would but you never know!I often wonder if FCUoM and MUFC ever ended up playing against each other in the FA Cup would there be the same kind of acrimony there was when AFC Wimbledon played the MK Dons?
I appreciate you taking the time to explain. Though, I did know the reasons behind their support for FCUM before hand. It's just that saying the owners ignored the fans seems to indicate that the club has been disastrously run and we're languishing in mediocrity, which clearly is not the case.The formation of both clubs were under very different circumstances to be fair. I would like to think not, because no FCUM fans want United to fail, or deny the validity of MUFC. They remain supporters of Manchester United Football Club, celebrate their success and want the club to be successful. They just refuse to line the pockets of the owners...and have decided that, as long standing supporters of their football club, they have been ignored too long.
AFC Wimbledon fans relationship with MK Dons is a totally different matter, and for good reason.
I'm sure you'd have a few idiots, but it's a totally different relationship.
Indeed, that's always been the word from FCUM fans. They stopped going to OT as to not line the pockets of the people they were set against owning the club.I often wonder myself, I don't think there would but you never know!
I remember a couple of years ago when both were in the 3rd round draw and it came up, I think most FCUoM fans said that if they were drawn away to United then just wouldn't turn up, leaving the away side empty.
The situation is very different.I often wonder if FCUoM and MUFC ever ended up playing against each other in the FA Cup would there be the same kind of acrimony there was when AFC Wimbledon played the MK Dons?
No worries, it was a mixture of things. It's wasn't about as much mediocrity or the threat of less success, it had alot to do with opposition to the debt from day one, and though, as you say we're another Leeds, there was no need to take the risk of putting our football club into debt in the first place.I appreciate you taking the time to explain. Though, I did know the reasons behind their support for FCUM before hand. It's just that saying the owners ignored the fans seems to indicate that the club has been disastrously run and we're languishing in mediocrity, which clearly is not the case.
If, of course, you are talking about the obscene ticket prices for matches then I can sympathise. Though, I would say that it is almost unilateral amongst the big clubs in England to charge obscene amounts of money for a ticket these days. It's a problem with the industry that is football and it needs to be addressed. However, we're not too bad. We come 7th in the PL list and for a club like United that's decent I would suggest. I want it to be lower, of course.
If there are other reasons that I'm not aware of, then by all means correct me. But, I just feel that to create your own club with a name similar to your parent club in an effort to show what is the "proper" way to run a club, just comes across a bit much for me. It's not like we're being run like Leeds. This is just me. Just my opinion.
Pretty muchThe situation is very different.
Whilst FC and Wimbledon have similar ownership models, they were formed under different circumstances.
Wimbledon were formed as in effect they lost their club. MK Franchise were actually a new team that stole the place of an older one.
FC is an addition/alternative (for some) rather than a replacement. You'll often hear the calypso and various Cantona chants at matches. A group of FC fans including myself recently visited the grave of Duncan Edwards before a Midlands away.
There's still a fair amount that watch United (again including me). I just stopped having a Season Ticket a few years ago and going FC seemed obvious. £100 for a season ticket at FC and I can stand where I want and have a say in how the club is run.
Well said. I am sure that most of the FCUM fans are like you.No worries, it was a mixture of things. It's wasn't about as much mediocrity or the threat of less success, it had alot to do with opposition to the debt from day one, and though, as you say we're another Leeds, there was no need to take the risk of putting our football club into debt in the first place.
The fact is it looks like we will service the debt, but why should we? We weren't in debt before these lot arrived. They took a risk with our football club, a calculated one, but a risk none the less. We have seen money disappear from the club to the line our owners pockets and it leaves a very sour taste in the mouth of alot of folk, including me. But that's another story.
Anyway, not to derail the thread, because it's not an FCUM debate thread as such. FCUM fans still have a deep love for MUFC, anyone who says not basically is clueless, lying or just plain stirring
That's why I don't think a meeting of the two sides should cause any issues between the support.
Yeah, I appreciate the scenarios are very different. Would be a slightly strange atmosphere all the same. Thinking about it, you might get the exact opposite to what happened with the MK Dons, as I reckon the vast majority of MUFC fans on the night would have a soft spot for the opposition team.The situation is very different.
Whilst FC and Wimbledon have similar ownership models, they were formed under different circumstances.
Wimbledon were formed as in effect they lost their club. MK Franchise were actually a new team that stole the place of an older one.
FC is an addition/alternative (for some) rather than a replacement. You'll often hear the calypso and various Cantona chants at matches. A group of FC fans including myself recently visited the grave of Duncan Edwards before a Midlands away.
There's still a fair amount that watch United (again including me). I just stopped having a Season Ticket a few years ago and going FC seemed obvious. £100 for a season ticket at FC and I can stand where I want and have a say in how the club is run.
The far more likely scenario is FC United v Salford City.Yeah, I appreciate the scenarios are very different. Would be a slightly strange atmosphere all the same. Thinking about it, you might get the exact opposite to what happened with the MK Dons, as I reckon the vast majority of MUFC fans on the night would have a soft spot for the opposition team.
I've written about this in other threads before, so some of this is cut and paste from previous replies, but here's my two pence worth:I often wonder if FCUoM and MUFC ever ended up playing against each other in the FA Cup would there be the same kind of acrimony there was when AFC Wimbledon played the MK Dons?