Usually his passing is pretty ok but this year the amount of times he gives the ball every game is shocking. He could do with a break though.Has it really?
I haven't really noticed, Anderson's passing is downright shocking, Fletcher, no, not at all
Fletcher's passing has been poor - he constantly gives the ball away.Strongly disagree. Both their distribution has been awful and their passing has been equally as poor, the only difference is that Fletcher gets around the pitch and puts way more pressure on the opposition than Carrick. If we didn't have a poor/injured central midfield Carrick wouldn't be anywhere near our best XI, Fletcher would still be in it.
That doesn't correlate with what I saw at all.He really didn't today though, literally 80% of his possession was poorly executed or outright wasted today, at least in the middle and attacking thirds. That's how it seemed anyway. And nobody is asking him to be Xavi or Iniesta, just to keep moves going because that is his job as a centre mid. I've seen Muamba use the ball better than that for fecks sake.
Don't agree with this, I still think our best midfield is a three of Carrick, Fletcher and Scholes. If Hargreaves went to Lourdes or something and came back in form it would be Fletcher's place he was threatening, by virtue of the sort of player he is. 'Nowhere near' is just nonsense.Strongly disagree. Both their distribution has been awful and their passing has been equally as poor, the only difference is that Fletcher gets around the pitch and puts way more pressure on the opposition than Carrick. If we didn't have a poor/injured central midfield Carrick wouldn't be anywhere near our best XI, Fletcher would still be in it.
It works well if both are on form and the attacking players are good enough to pick the ball up to feet and provide their own creativity.How many times have a Fletcher/Carrick midfield pair actually worked well?
Agree, think Welbeck would add to our side this year, let alone next.I'd agree with Ferguson's post earlier on in the thread.
Our front line were very static in the entire game. When Rooney/Ronnie and Tevez were in their prime they'd be continually swapping positions, roaming, opening up space which made it much easier for our midfielders to find a pass.
Thats one part of Welbecks game that I do like. He is very comfortable in roaming around the pitch and running down blind alleys for the team. One of his strengths.
He's played with Carrick and Scholes and Anderson a couple of times before...Fletcher's not really got going this season but it can't be easy playing with a different partner every week.
The OP is a bit melodramatic tbh.
Park didn't make the run that Carrick anticipated, you can't blame Carrick for that.There was one pass in the first half from Carrick where he just hoofed it to the left not even looking.. Really frustrating sometimes.
I put him in the MotM because I thought he was our second best player today. Tried to show invention, quite a lot didn't come off put he was the only one really providing any forward thrust for most of the game. It wasn't as if we were spoiled for choice today.I thought he had another stinker today but there's always people who list him in their top 3 for MotM. Makes you wonder if they watch the game. I was disappointed it was Carrick that came off again when he was (albeit not by a lot) better.
Using that logic he shouldn't have been there because Rafael, Park and Evra also tried but they succeeded.I put him in the MotM because I thought he was our second best player today. Tried to show invention, quite a lot didn't come off put he was the only one really providing any forward thrust for most of the game. It wasn't as if we were spoiled for choice today.
That just happened to have an amazing 2 seasons and lauded by plaudits all around. Yup average man for Wigan.Durrrrr. This completely bemuses me, Fletcher's an average PL CM who should be playing for Bolton or Wigan (I made the Muamba comparison way back) always was and still is.
Ummmm..... no. Do you understand what logic means? That is just not an argument.Using that logic he shouldn't have been there because Rafael, Park and Evra also tried but they succeeded.
I know more about football than Sir Alex Ferguson
Bale is less underrated than Fletcher.Still without question the most underrated player in the world.
I don't understand you're agenda against Fletcher. All the Arsenal fans I know drool over the prospect of having him in the Arsenal team, and I think an Arsenal with Fletcher would be a huge force in the league, probably favourites.Bale is less underrated than Fletcher.
Did you see the game (I'd guess not)? Song was superb probably my MoM.Peter how well did Song play today?
Yeah Song was good, and is also a fantastic player.Did you see the game (I'd guess not)? Song was superb probably my MoM.
You said you put him in the top three because he really did try, although a lot of it didn't come off right. Well Park tried a lot. Rafael tried a lot. Evra tried a lot. 2 assists and one goal right there.Ummmm..... no. Do you understand what logic means? That is just not an argument.
No one in Arsenal was MoM. First half very good. Second half awful. Song was not good in the second half. His silly foul (a very typical Song foul) led to a dangerous free kick that ended in a goal after another bit of sillyness.Did you see the game (I'd guess not)? Song was superb probably my MoM.
Modric dived.No one in Arsenal was MoM. First half very good. Second half awful. Song was not good in the second half. His silly foul (a very typical Song foul) led to a dangerous free kick that ended in a goal after another bit of sillyness.
I also said for most of the game, therefore implying that I'm discussing it on a quantitative basis. Fletcher provided for most the game the most quality and invention going forward, just because Park had a cross that came off doesn't mean he contributed as much as Fletcher.You said you put him in the top three because he really did try, although a lot of it didn't come off right. Well Park tried a lot. Rafael tried a lot. Evra tried a lot. 2 assists and one goal right there.
No one in Arsenal was MoM. First half very good. Second half awful. Song was not good in the second half. His silly foul (a very typical Song foul) led to a dangerous free kick that ended in a goal after another bit of sillyness.Did you see the game (I'd guess not)? Song was superb probably my MoM.
I do think he contributed more than Fletcher. Won a lot of free kicks and made an assist. An assist is a pretty big contribution. That's the main reason why he contributed more but it's not like he did nothing besides the assist. If he didn't lose the ball a couple of times like he did it wouldn't be as close.I also said for most of the game, therefore implying that I'm discussing it on a quantitative basis. Fletcher provided for most the game the most quality and invention going forward, just because Park had a cross that came off doesn't mean he contributed as much as Fletcher.
Rafael was my MoM so agree with you there.