For all the ETH haters. We are generating chances

Sweet Square

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
23,695
Location
The Zone
Well, they had a penalty with a 0.8 xG and United had two great chances not calculated in the xG.

The team don't generate enough chances in general though. I think there were only 4 games this season when we did that and deserved to win, Spurs, Nottingham, yesterday and the league cup game. 4 out of 13 which is nowhere near good enough.
Cheers.

Their expected goals is a bit weird because I don't remember them having too many clear cut chances
Yeah I’ve think their penalty really messes with the number. Bloody nerds!
 

swissgenius

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
552
Yeah, the stats back up the actual results, which are pretty poor.

In fact, I even think we were lucky more often than not, remember our league opener against Wolves? That didn't even deserve a point, not to mention the win.
Also the wins against Burnley and Forest could've easily been draws, so I have the feeling that in terms of league position at least, we stand better than the actual performances deserve.

The only game I'd call us unlucky in terms of result, is the Galatasaray CL, that was a joke ending and not deserved at all.

Happy with the last 3 wins, even if the performances were poor, but that's how you stay in competition and build confidence first. I believe the football will get better as the confidence comes back.
 

Chumpsbechumps

Full Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
2,557
They had the penalty and should have scored early on where they hit the post.
Garnacho was 1/1 and had McT just beside him which would of been a tap in. I dont get XxG, it is often a bit of a head scratcher. kind of like a "I am watching this game and that team didnt really look like scoring" but the xG is all weird.

United deserved the win and looked most likely to score. I mean Ericsons shot in second half when he had a clear shot on goal in the box, he really should of scored.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,954
I dont think he will be sacked under this regime. If Ratcliffee finally gets his wish to buy into the club and take control of the football side of it, he will be on thin ice. Depends if/when we 'kick on'. This is mentioned after every win though, so has lost its impact.
I can see TH being given the majority of this season, but if by Feb/March we are out of Ch Lge and around 7th/8th place, with no improvement on the style, then Potter, or whoever else is on Ratcliffes radar, might be brought in to get their feet under the table, so not starting cold for the new season.
 

TomSkalle

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 19, 2023
Messages
123
Location
Norway
Second year in a row we are at negative goal difference. Most of last season we were at negative.
6 teams above us has 10+ goals or more, and we are sitting at a healthy -2 atm.

So no, its not bad luck.
 

DJ_21

Evens winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
12,257
Location
Manchester
Spurs scored in the 98th and 100th minute to get the points at Sheffield United and Man City scored an 88th minute winner there too for some perspective on the "Top teams dominate these games and score about 3+ goals".
Ye but did they still dominate? Our games are toe to toe. They’re having the same amount as chances as us.
 

SirScholes

Full Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
6,200
Spurs scored in the 98th and 100th minute to get the points at Sheffield United and Man City scored an 88th minute winner there too for some perspective on the "Top teams dominate these games and score about 3+ goals".
Newcastle scored 8
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
5,077
it's easy to apply the logic that it's just our lack of finishing letting us down but if you look at the bigger picture we have been let of the hook with the opposition guilty of the same thing in our matches, just look at last night for example, Copenhagen could have easily taken the lead with the Maguire error
 

Irwin99

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
9,392
The 'haters' stuff is really immature. Like a lot of fans I really like EtH and want him to succeed but it's been hard work for what feels like a long period now, with very little signs of progress.

Do we create lots of chances? Yes and no. the problem is the first half is usually dire and we are creating barely anything and usually fall a goal behind or the atmosphere around the team/fans looks toxic because we're so fecking fed up of watching this shower of shite yet again. This changes in the second half (maybe the players are actually shamed into actually putting in some effort?) and we create things but are so wasteful and unintelligent.

Why can't we play attacking football for 90 minutes? why do we always have to have a drama before we start making actual chances? Why is the attack and midfield so inept?
 

evil_geko

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2005
Messages
5,914

:nervous:
This shows exactly how xG is bunch of bolocks. They were added something like 0.8 only because of penalty, and our two 100% chances were not included because we didn't have a shot off. Anyone using only xG as some "evidence" is clueless like the stat he is using.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,748
Location
Krakow
Ye but did they still dominate? Our games are toe to toe. They’re having the same amount as chances as us.
Spurs had 28 shots vs 7, City 30-6. We had 14-12 and they had more on target.

It's fine to have the occasional game against a supposedly weaker side where you struggle to break them down and end up winning narrowly, or not at all. We had many of these under Fergie too and you just attributed them to just not being our day.

It becomes an issue when you get constantly matched/outplayed by lesser teams and seem unable to really dominate any of these games. We technically dominated Nottingham, Palace and Brentford games on stats but we went down very early in all of them which encouraged the opposition to sit back and absorb the pressure, especially as we don't seem particularly good at breaking teams down anyway.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,077
Location
Canada
This shows exactly how xG is bunch of bolocks. They were added something like 0.8 only because of penalty, and our two 100% chances were not included because we didn't have a shot off. Anyone using only xG as some "evidence" is clueless like the stat he is using.
I mean... The penalty did happen didn't it? There's a very real chance if McTominay doesn't stick his boot up that their guy has a free header at the back post for an easy goal.

And yes we had big chances that our players didn't turn into shots. Both of those are true. If we got our shots off maybe put xG would be closer to 2.2-2.5 range. We didn't so it doesn't matter. There's no way to spin yesterday as if we dominated. We were better in the 2nd half but were lucky to get away with the win given their late chance. They were the much better side in the first half. A draw on the balance of the 90 minutes would have been pretty fair, which is basically what that shows.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,077
Location
Canada
Spurs scored in the 98th and 100th minute to get the points at Sheffield United and Man City scored an 88th minute winner there too for some perspective on the "Top teams dominate these games and score about 3+ goals".
We also played against Burnley with the same story where we were lucky to end with a win, while both Spurs and City dominated those games. It's one thing having the odd off day. It's another when you have this situation every time you play against a bottom half level opponent. And when you just deservedly lose against every top half opponent. That just points to being a mid table side.
 

BellionsBalloon

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 23, 2023
Messages
9
Ye but did they still dominate? Our games are toe to toe. They’re having the same amount as chances as us.
The same amount of chances could be that we had arguably our 4th and 5th choice centerbacks, our second choice rightback and our 3rd choice centerback at leftback? In fairness, we had over 60% of the ball.
 

BellionsBalloon

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 23, 2023
Messages
9
We also played against Burnley with the same story where we were lucky to end with a win, while both Spurs and City dominated those games. It's one thing having the odd off day. It's another when you have this situation every time you play against a bottom half level opponent. And when you just deservedly lose against every top half opponent. That just points to being a mid table side.
Yeah, that's fair. But it's also worth remembering we've had horrendous luck with injures during these games. Missing up to eight players at this point and still getting a result away from home is a good thing.
 

Max_United

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2013
Messages
255
Standards of United fans in terms of manager expectations:

2010: win the league, latter stages of CL and play attractive attacking football

2015: make top four, challenge for the title soon, play at least somewhat attractive non-boring football at times

2020: just make top four

2023: create chances against Copenhagen and Galatasaray
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,840
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
There are no "ETH haters". None of us are sat around saying "I bloody hate ETH, I really hope he fails". Some of us can't see that there's any improvement, or even plan, at all, and that's our concern.

He sounds like a Manchester United manager and I actually like him as a bloke - but I'm not sure he's got the eye for a player, for a solution or the coaching/tactical ability to be a truly elite coach.
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,568
Unfortunately we are not. I could at times be fine with the number of chances we currently create - which you can count on half a hand - if we were rock solid at defending (as a team), but we are incredibly, like stupidly open. Therefore we actually need to create much much more.
 

gaffs

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
12,848
Location
Moscow 08, Rome 09, London 11
There are no "ETH haters". None of us are sat around saying "I bloody hate ETH, I really hope he fails". Some of us can't see that there's any improvement, or even plan, at all, and that's our concern.

He sounds like a Manchester United manager and I actually like him as a bloke - but I'm not sure he's got the eye for a player, for a solution or the coaching/tactical ability to be a truly elite coach.
Agree. Everyone wants to see him succeed. I too like the guy and a lot of what he has done. But for whatever reason, he is not getting anything out of these players.

There is no repeatable patterns of play, no clear system, no pressing. He is chopping and changing his team. He throws away his principles to include McTominay just because he scored a couple v Brentford. He has spent huge amounts of money on players that are no where near good enough, Anthony, or is not using, Mount.

It doesn't feel like we are better off with ETH over the past year and a half than we were under Ole.
 

Jezpeza

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
2,035
We dont create enough good chances. And you need lots because not every good chance is scored. Even the most clinical strikers dont have anywhere near 100% chance conversion.

besides which, what is this OP? If we are 14th and out the cups in December but have ‘made chances’ then everything is grand? Its about results at the end of the day.

We are dire all over the pitch at the moment and are only scraping wins against the weakest of teams. Absolutely no sign if us picking up and going on a run of form at the moment and there hasnt been at any point this season. I have no complaints with last night if we have an off game in the middle of a good run but it was another dire performance and we were lucky to take all 3 points
 

swissgenius

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
552
I would agree that creating lots of chances but barely scrapping a win is fine, as the chances will eventually turn into goals long-term.

But we are not even close to creating enough chances. xG won't convince me otherwise, especially since those numbers don't even back up your claim. They say we are exactly where we deserve.
I dare you to watch the first 60 mins of yesterday's game and writing down every high danger scoring chance you find.
With the addition of Eriksen and the growing desperation for anything really, the goal chances started to come but your standards have fallen pretty low if 3-4 goal chances at home against Copenhagen is what you'd call a good performance.

The performances so far have not been acceptable!
That being said, we are still in possibility of CL KO round and the top teams have given away enough points in the league for us not to be completely dead already, so there is still hope for improvements!
ETH shouldn't be in question. I don't get all of his actions, lineups and subs, but there should be a minimum of 2 years for a manager to prove himself. Otherwise the club gets lost in the hamster wheel. He did fine last season, let's see if he can build on it.
It's not like there is a huge british manager talent out there waiting for the job.
 

theatreofdreams777

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 30, 2022
Messages
289
The worrying thing is most of our big chances were created by counterattack, this is where Bruno excels. If we play possession based game, we seem to cycle the ball sideways all the way.
That's the story of the last 10 years TBH. Despite the enormous amount of money spent, we couldn't manage to build a team with technical players that plays possesion based game and dominates opposition.

I hope ten Hag reverts to last years tactics and we play more on the counter. Should focus on improving our defence too. That's the only way we could get results nowadays. Especially in the remaining CL games. Otherwise I see us going out of CL in group stages.
 

Jezpeza

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
2,035
Was actually surprised to see that his win ratio is 64% .
This is disrupted by his lack of draws. Out of interest, these are loss ratios ranked by manager since SAF

DM 29.4
ETH 24
OGS 23.8
LVG 23.3
JM 19.5
SAF 17.8

under ETH its like we either turn up or we dont.

SAF still the GOAT
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,668
There are no "ETH haters". None of us are sat around saying "I bloody hate ETH, I really hope he fails".
Whilst I'm sure this is the case for many. There are some who post with that narrative, sadly.
 

Valencia Shin Crosses

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
6,824
Location
"Martial...He's isolated Skrtel here..."
Expecting a manager in his second year after getting many of his preferred targets to have a team that creates a good amount of chances/scores goals isn't "hating". It could be excused last season as we genuinely lacked any sort of goal scoring outlets outside of Rashford and we were just learning how to play under ETH so being solid defensively was more important. But there's no excuse this season, and CERTAINLY not an excuse to become so much worse in playing style and structure so far. It genuinely looks as static as I've seen post SAF, and we are just mediocre at everything without any strengths as a team. That falls solely on ETH's shoulders, especially when you watch a team like Spurs play a very pleasing style after only a couple of months under their new manager. Our build up structure is a joke, and we don't have a set plan for creating chances.
 

RedOrange

Full Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2015
Messages
1,124
There are no "ETH haters". None of us are sat around saying "I bloody hate ETH, I really hope he fails". Some of us can't see that there's any improvement, or even plan, at all, and that's our concern.
There are for sure Caf posters who think exactly like that. Ronaldo fanboys, Pochettino fanboys, Ole/Rangnick loyalists, etc.