M Bison
Full Member
I bloody hate xG, I think i'm probably getting old and grumpy but i dont like it.
Their expected goals is a bit weird because I don't remember them having too many clear cut chancesTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Cheers.Well, they had a penalty with a 0.8 xG and United had two great chances not calculated in the xG.
The team don't generate enough chances in general though. I think there were only 4 games this season when we did that and deserved to win, Spurs, Nottingham, yesterday and the league cup game. 4 out of 13 which is nowhere near good enough.
Yeah I’ve think their penalty really messes with the number. Bloody nerds!Their expected goals is a bit weird because I don't remember them having too many clear cut chances
They had the penalty and should have scored early on where they hit the post.Their expected goals is a bit weird because I don't remember them having too many clear cut chances
Garnacho was 1/1 and had McT just beside him which would of been a tap in. I dont get XxG, it is often a bit of a head scratcher. kind of like a "I am watching this game and that team didnt really look like scoring" but the xG is all weird.They had the penalty and should have scored early on where they hit the post.
Ye but did they still dominate? Our games are toe to toe. They’re having the same amount as chances as us.Spurs scored in the 98th and 100th minute to get the points at Sheffield United and Man City scored an 88th minute winner there too for some perspective on the "Top teams dominate these games and score about 3+ goals".
Newcastle scored 8Spurs scored in the 98th and 100th minute to get the points at Sheffield United and Man City scored an 88th minute winner there too for some perspective on the "Top teams dominate these games and score about 3+ goals".
This shows exactly how xG is bunch of bolocks. They were added something like 0.8 only because of penalty, and our two 100% chances were not included because we didn't have a shot off. Anyone using only xG as some "evidence" is clueless like the stat he is using.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Spurs had 28 shots vs 7, City 30-6. We had 14-12 and they had more on target.Ye but did they still dominate? Our games are toe to toe. They’re having the same amount as chances as us.
I mean... The penalty did happen didn't it? There's a very real chance if McTominay doesn't stick his boot up that their guy has a free header at the back post for an easy goal.This shows exactly how xG is bunch of bolocks. They were added something like 0.8 only because of penalty, and our two 100% chances were not included because we didn't have a shot off. Anyone using only xG as some "evidence" is clueless like the stat he is using.
We also played against Burnley with the same story where we were lucky to end with a win, while both Spurs and City dominated those games. It's one thing having the odd off day. It's another when you have this situation every time you play against a bottom half level opponent. And when you just deservedly lose against every top half opponent. That just points to being a mid table side.Spurs scored in the 98th and 100th minute to get the points at Sheffield United and Man City scored an 88th minute winner there too for some perspective on the "Top teams dominate these games and score about 3+ goals".
The same amount of chances could be that we had arguably our 4th and 5th choice centerbacks, our second choice rightback and our 3rd choice centerback at leftback? In fairness, we had over 60% of the ball.Ye but did they still dominate? Our games are toe to toe. They’re having the same amount as chances as us.
Yeah, that's fair. But it's also worth remembering we've had horrendous luck with injures during these games. Missing up to eight players at this point and still getting a result away from home is a good thing.We also played against Burnley with the same story where we were lucky to end with a win, while both Spurs and City dominated those games. It's one thing having the odd off day. It's another when you have this situation every time you play against a bottom half level opponent. And when you just deservedly lose against every top half opponent. That just points to being a mid table side.
Agree. Everyone wants to see him succeed. I too like the guy and a lot of what he has done. But for whatever reason, he is not getting anything out of these players.There are no "ETH haters". None of us are sat around saying "I bloody hate ETH, I really hope he fails". Some of us can't see that there's any improvement, or even plan, at all, and that's our concern.
He sounds like a Manchester United manager and I actually like him as a bloke - but I'm not sure he's got the eye for a player, for a solution or the coaching/tactical ability to be a truly elite coach.
That's the story of the last 10 years TBH. Despite the enormous amount of money spent, we couldn't manage to build a team with technical players that plays possesion based game and dominates opposition.The worrying thing is most of our big chances were created by counterattack, this is where Bruno excels. If we play possession based game, we seem to cycle the ball sideways all the way.
This is disrupted by his lack of draws. Out of interest, these are loss ratios ranked by manager since SAFWas actually surprised to see that his win ratio is 64% .
Whilst I'm sure this is the case for many. There are some who post with that narrative, sadly.There are no "ETH haters". None of us are sat around saying "I bloody hate ETH, I really hope he fails".
You think the guys above him care about xG or patterns of play or whatever? Bad results, will get bad press, will get a sack.People who think he is going to be sacked have lost the plot
There are for sure Caf posters who think exactly like that. Ronaldo fanboys, Pochettino fanboys, Ole/Rangnick loyalists, etc.There are no "ETH haters". None of us are sat around saying "I bloody hate ETH, I really hope he fails". Some of us can't see that there's any improvement, or even plan, at all, and that's our concern.