RedRonaldo
Wishes to be oppressed.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2003
- Messages
- 18,996
54m +15m add ons would be good deal for us. It would be somewhere between the price of Sancho and Bruno, or very close to both.
Aaargh, don't worry, they always find something to criticize!The moaners and anti-negotiators have gone quiet at these latest reported figures.
What?If he does know, he is not putting it in that article. He always does seem a little smug telling two years later that he knew a lot more than he let on.
Barca will need to spin it differently or their socios will freak.£54m fixed with £15m in add ons looks a very good deal if Mitten is correct.
Why will Martin Blackburn run the story, who is considered very reliable for ManCity. Is he on club PR list?He’s the club PR. Which is probably why he’s going with this Maguire story.
In the 50’s. But they have been feeding it out they would accept less. Somewhere in the 40’s. This is coming from Fab.I thought Torres release clause is similar to the €60m quoted for Martinez?
I was talking about Mitten.Why will Martin Blackburn run the story, who is considered very reliable for ManCity. Is he on club PR list?
Me too. But only after the tier1 tweet.Guess can finally relax and watch the YouTube comps now
I think that was probably true then. Since though, they have sold Haller and possibly will sell Martinez to Arsenal. Changes the dynamics of the situation a bit.It was reported at least 6 weeks ago that United were confident of getting a deal done for around an initial £50m. Let’s see the final figures, but as usual, the transfer season brings out the very worst in portions of our fan base.
Anyways the post I replied to was nothing to do with Maguire. It was about the fee.I was talking about Mitten.
I've seen every minute of every match since he joined, and I can't say I've ever been impressed by him. It's a matter of fact that Ole or Ralf almost never started with him or was their substitute when they wanted to have a change in our game (when we were losing or drawing). If they never started with him or substituted him in, they didn't have anything personal with him, he simply was not good enough. I agree that he lost his confidence, but anytime he was on the field, he seemed quite slow with his movements, timing was wrong, nothing special on passes.Honestly you’ve hardly seen him play since he’s joined us. You’re judging a player that was deemed to have something special when joining us on poor management by Ole and don’t even get me started on frank. Hardly had anytime to shine but yeah let’s get rid of a potential class player
embarrassing comment by yourself kid
‘They’ in this equation would be Barcelona, De Jong’s club, not Ajax.I think that was probably true then. Since though, they have sold Haller and possibly will sell Martinez to Arsenal. Changes the dynamics of the situation a bit.
My mates an Evertonian and says the fans loved him too.Hahahaha you do realise he started every game until he was injured hahahahaha?
For some reason I thought you were talking about Antony‘They’ in this equation would be Barcelona, De Jong’s club, not Ajax.
That’s a steal! Surprised how we’ve managed to get him that cheaply.
To be fair to Andy, he does a lot of work with the Manchester United Foundation and anything he does know comes from club contacts. As such he is probably under no illusions what he can and can't reveal and how that affects his status.If he does know, he is not putting it in that article. He always does seem a little smug telling two years later that he knew a lot more than he let on.
It’s a bid. Where does it say this is the one that will be accepted? We haven’t got him yet, and if we do, it will presumably be for a higher offer.That’s a steal! Surprised how we’ve managed to get him that cheaply.
If the deal falls apart now, we will know who to blame6. You may have just jinxed usGuess can finally relax and watch the YouTube comps now
Have you considered that The Athletic, like any media outlet, knows that stories about United generate the most traffic on their platforms and that by publishing sensationalist headlines like Ten Hag frustrated with United [while he's on vacation] and Ronaldo wants out [while he's on vacation] will help generate traffic and increase their revenue?Reported by The Althetic, ask them.
Yes, but I also consider that the Telegraph and multiple other reputable source reported the same, plus his agent meeting with Chelsea and Ronaldo being discussed (not the first club too)Have you considered that The Athletic, like any media outlet, knows that stories about United generate the most traffic on their platforms and that by publishing sensationalist headlines like Ten Hag frustrated with United [while he's on vacation] and Ronaldo wants out [while he's on vacation] will help generate traffic and increase their revenue?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I highly doubt that he’ll be like Anderson, different style of plays to start with. De Jong will thrive under a manager that knows exactly what role and position to play him in (ten Hag).We're going to look really stupid if he turns out to be another Anderson!
I can feel itSoon...
If only we gave them £80m 2 weeks ago he could have had photos holding up a shirt while on holiday"Pay them what they want and be done with it"
That is great business if trueTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date