Crashoutcassius
Full Member
I'd say all combined get less than 5 starts
Don't think Jesse was more exciting than any of the three you mentioned. Tunnicliffe was a bigger name in that FAYC team than Jesse. Also remember years ago people were saying Laird was as talented a defender as Greenwood was a forward but that shine seems to have been rubbed off in recent times with all his injuries but nothing to say he doesn't overcome them with time.Hannibal, Garnacho and laird are the only players that have potential of maybe making it here. GarnerChrist Pogba, Jesse and Ravel where more exiting, I had high hopes and it didn't turn out well. Garner to be hones, I think won't get on Scott's level
What would this tell us?I'd say all combined get less than 5 starts
Some combo of the quality not being there, some players not being ready and ETH being under pressure from day one and not having the luxury, I believeWhat would this tell us?
Garnacho - reserves, occasional sub appearance
Hannibal - some sub appearances or a loan
Garner - Premier League loan with Forrest
Laird - Cup games or sell
Pellistri - cup or sell
Amad - Sell
Chong - sell
Shoretire - sell
Tuanzebe - sell
If I'm being honest, this is my guess for next season. 23/24 I can see Garner/Hannibal/Garnacho/Amad being part of the squad depending on progression... but not next year really.
Selling amad or Shoretire or Laird would be plain dumbcorrected some
DisagreeSelling amad or Shoretire or Laird would be plain dumb
Shoretire is a few months into turning 18! And he's always been highly rated! Just because a young player doesn't become 1st team ready by 18 doesn't mean they aren't worth keeping around. And with Amad, we invested so much that it's just again, dumb, to sell him at a huge loss before at least developing him. He and Shoretire clearly have plenty of talent. Nurture that, and then sell them off in time if they aren't enough to step in or when you can actually get decent money for them.Disagree
laird has a year left play him or let him go, play Amad and shoretire or let them go is reasonable in my view
Shoretire is a few months into turning 18! And he's always been highly rated! Just because a young player doesn't become 1st team ready by 18 doesn't mean they aren't worth keeping around. And with Amad, we invested so much that it's just again, dumb, to sell him at a huge loss before at least developing him. He and Shoretire clearly have plenty of talent. Nurture that, and then sell them off in time if they aren't enough to step in or when you can actually get decent money for them.
Didn’t he have a decent run of good performances? I’m sure it was more than just one.Aye, Cameron Borthwick-Jackson had a top performance once too. Not to be seen at the club again.
I agree. None of them look ready.None of them will get many games and to be honest, desperately trying to play youth should be the least of our concerns at this moment. So unless we have a big injury crisis or win our EL group stage with a couple games to spare, can't see any of them featuring much at all.
Why on earth would you send Amad back to Scotland? That loan was a complete waste of time for him? Better to send him to the championship to a club that will actually play him.I agree. None of them look ready.
Hannibal is probably closest to it but he needs regular minutes, to grow up basically, and I hope he gets loaned.
Amad looks a good prospect but not physically ready. If it’s an option, another year in Scotland would be good.
Garner doesn’t look anything like an elite midfielder to me. A year on loan in the Prem would give him a chance to step up.
Loans are the short term future for all these boys.
We've got so many players hopefully leaving and we're not going to replace them all with transfers.I agree. None of them look ready.
Hannibal is probably closest to it but he needs regular minutes, to grow up basically, and I hope he gets loaned.
Amad looks a good prospect but not physically ready. If it’s an option, another year in Scotland would be good.
Garner doesn’t look anything like an elite midfielder to me. A year on loan in the Prem would give him a chance to step up.
Loans are the short term future for all these boys.
Didn’t he have a decent run of good performances? I’m sure it was more than just one.
Of all the young defenders LvG gave debuts to, CBJ looked to me like the one most likely to make it. Had a name that made him sound like a top physicist as well
I was really disappointed when he went on loan to Wolves and acted like a big time Charlie; our academy players being entitled cnuts has been a thing for a while. He is now playing for Burton Albion.
It wasn’t a complete waste of time. He got minutes playing with good players.Why on earth would you send Amad back to Scotland? That loan was a complete waste of time for him? Better to send him to the championship to a club that will actually play him.
Popular with the girls as well. At least he is in my house.I must admit I’ve had a soft spot for Pellistri. Got the skill & a likeable attitude. Hope he gets a chance. Kids a baller
This post only makes sense if you've never seen Pellistri play for Alaves.How good does his pre-season need to be then? This is the 35 apps, 0 goals (0,07npxG90), 0 assists (0,05xA90) winger for Alaves last season. It's hard to see why we would want a small, young winger with absolutely no goalthreat on the bench even.... smells like another loan spell for him.
Can you elaborate as I and am sure others posting opinions genuinely haven’t seen him play for Alaves but his complete lack of production has baffled me based on his performances for the 23s and for Uruguay.This post only makes sense if you've never seen Pellistri play for Alaves.
I've heard ETH hates rotating, and barely rotates. I would send most of them on loan. Maybe keep Garner.