That's not what he's saying.
He's saying that we shouldn't bring in any old manager without a clear succession plan, and without planning to ensure that the next coach is a good fit for the squad. LvG was poor with Moyes' squad, and Mourinho was poor with LvG's squad. Both wasted huge amounts of money to remould the team and left it in tatters after they left.
Ole's built a talented squad but isn't good enough to get the best out of it. His replacement needs to be somebody who easily fits the existing philosophy without needing to spend hundreds of millions to rebuild from scratch.
The bolded is our biggest issue as a club. We should have contingency plans in place as an institution but every time this point comes we act surprised that the manager hasn’t replicated the exception that is, SAF.
OgS has failed dramatically this season & after today should be in an untenable position. We shouldn’t keep OgS because another manager may fail, he’s had his chances.
We should have a very short list of managers who we feel for the profile we have [whatever that is], we shouldn’t be restricting ourselves to lists of unemployed managers. If the guy we want is in a job, we should either stump up & get him or hire a caretaker for exactly that purpose until the right candidate can leave his club.
Hiring the next manager should have nothing to do with sacking OgS. We convolute the process, OgS isn’t SAF leaving - tens of managers could manage the club to losses against Leicester, Everton & Young Boys.