Glazer Statement

Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
3,094
Location
Salford
Yes they can, even if they can not do so from their own liquid assets then they can easily either transfer it to a holding company in their name or secure a bond or bonds in that amount based without using Man Utd as collateral. They could do this in less than a fortnight if they were so inclined.
Even if they could get the funds, they have no intention of doing so. They have spent fifteen years paying huge interest on loans taken out in the club's name. They are not going to change that now. They want to own the club without using their own money. Their model is parasitical.
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,469

I know people hate Goldbridge but his points in this are spot on.

If we pretend for a minute that the Glazers do care and they do believe they have invested properly in this club then priority number one is getting a football based CEO and team etc.

The Glazers allowed Woodward and Judge and Arnold to throw money away for 8 years now. It's criminal ownership.

So basically if they want to show they care
1. Revamp who runs the club. Get VDS or a CEO at another successful club.
2. Let go all of Woodwards College and JP Morgan buddies.
3. Start clearing the debt once and for all.
4. Back Ole properly this summer.
5. Starting renovating the stadium.
6. Suspend dividends atleast until we are successful again.


If they aren't doing around 4 of the things mentioned then the letter is is only a lie.
 

swooshboy

Band of Brothers
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
10,737
Location
London
Am really not sure what people expected?

Yes, these are just words – actions are what matter. But they have outlined what they will commit to do. If they fail to do so, then they should expect more protests.

But it is mindless to protest towards them taking notice, and then choosing to ignore any response from them because they see it as 'pure PR guff', whilst patting themselves on the back for seeing through it.

I am still yet to see a realistic proposal of who could replace them. People seem to want someone who is prepared to spend £4b of their own money and then not take a penny from the club.

For those who proudly state that they would be happy to see us relegated if it meant seeing the back of the Glazers, I have a few issues with this. Firstly, I do not see how boycotting sponsors because we do not like our owners would make us an attractive proposition for any future potential sponsor. People say that sponsors will come flocking back...but that is nothing more than a hope and a guess. Secondly, there is absolutely no certainty that the next buyer will be any better. and lastly, and absolutely not leastly, if we were to get relegated, what do people think would happen to many of the people employed by the club? People behind the scenes who have worked at Manchester United for years, decades even? I know a number of these people and it is naive to think that all these roles will be maintained if we are relegated. I know the response will be 'but we will bounce right back', but we will suffer an absolutely huge loss of income and this ill have to be met somehow.

I love United, and have done for over 30 years. But I have bigger, more real concerns in my life than who owns Manchester United Football Club. I have not been able to see my kids since August last year because of COVID. My mother was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer this year. I agree that a leveraged buy-out of the cub should not have been allowed. But we are where we are. And we are here because we went public as a company. Ever since then, we became open to investors.

And, there is no guarantee that the next investor will be someone who can afford to spend the sum required to buy us without wanting a return on their investment – whilst be happy handing off all running of the club that they own to someone else. If people know of such a person, then fantastic. But in the absence of such knowledge, I feel that this outreach from the Glazers is one that should be both met, and made clear that they will be held accountable to their words.
 

Reddevil1978

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
215
All sorted then, just waiting on them announcing Sancho, Grealish and Rice.

Or will the investment be Cavani for another year, new treadmills at Carrington and a lick of paint for Old Trafford.
 

Matriac

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2020
Messages
1,488
Give Old Trafford a huge renovation
Makes plans to develop the grounds outside Old Trafford
Give fan representation on the board (preferably me)
Sign: Rice, Haaland, me, Sancho, extend Pogba to a non-monster contract
Hire: Eric Cantona to do the Stadium speaking during matches, Graeme Souness as Paul Pogbas personal masseuse
Donate: 2021 annual dividends to local charities spread out in the greater Manchester area

Do that and you can stay
I'll support this if you can use your influence on the board to hire me as Phelan's replacement. I want to be Ole's new buddy traveling around and give our players a pat on the shoulder.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,511
Even if they could get the funds, they have no intention of doing so. They have spent fifteen years paying huge interest on loans taken out in the club's name. They are not going to change that now. They want to own the club without using their own money. Their model is parasitical.
You are correct.

What I responded to was you saying that they couldn't do it, not that they won't do it.
 

Judge Red

Don't Call Me Douglas
Joined
Feb 11, 2006
Messages
5,993
Cool. Let’s forgive and forget and change our name to Doormatchester Utd.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,511
Wouldn't the easiest thing for them to do would be to fully refloat it, sell all the shares, and walk off with the massive windfall? Rather than to find that 1 person on consortium with a spare £3 billion +?
Hmm I am not sure, the stock value would obviously increase by a significant margin if they cleared all the debt. Whether it would increase by the degree of what they would have to spend would be above my head.
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,469
If they did that it would be a huge start at least
To me that would be a papering over the cracks. As long as the debt is their and we don't have the right CEO and people on the board the future of this club will be very rocky.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
If they did that it would be a huge start at least
The least they can do, they’re actually in a good position with the team and squad being so good atm one marquee signing would probably even be enough..
 

ArjenIsM3

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
5,641
Location
Netherlands

I know people hate Goldbridge but his points in this are spot on.

If we pretend for a minute that the Glazers do care and they do believe they have invested properly in this club then priority number one is getting a football based CEO and team etc.

The Glazers allowed Woodward and Judge and Arnold to throw money away for 8 years now. It's criminal ownership.

So basically if they want to show they care
1. Revamp who runs the club. Get VDS or a CEO at another successful club.
2. Let go all of Woodwards College and JP Morgan buddies.
3. Start clearing the debt once and for all.
4. Back Ole properly this summer.
5. Starting renovating the stadium.
6. Suspend dividends atleast until we are successful again.


If they aren't doing around 4 of the things mentioned then the letter is is only a lie.
Honestly you can't expect us to clear the debt and properly renovate Old Trafford. With the state it's in it's going to take a massive sum to renovate. Agree with most of the rest. More protests should and likely will follow if they don't back up their words with actions. A good start would be appointing a football oriented successor to Woodward.
 

francobaresi

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
5,615
Am really not sure what people expected?

Yes, these are just words – actions are what matter. But they have outlined what they will commit to do. If they fail to do so, then they should expect more protests.

But it is mindless to protest towards them taking notice, and then choosing to ignore any response from them because they see it as 'pure PR guff', whilst patting themselves on the back for seeing through it.

I am still yet to see a realistic proposal of who could replace them. People seem to want someone who is prepared to spend £4b of their own money and then not take a penny from the club.

For those who proudly state that they would be happy to see us relegated if it meant seeing the back of the Glazers, I have a few issues with this. Firstly, I do not see how boycotting sponsors because we do not like our owners would make us an attractive proposition for any future potential sponsor. People say that sponsors will come flocking back...but that is nothing more than a hope and a guess. Secondly, there is absolutely no certainty that the next buyer will be any better. and lastly, and absolutely not leastly, if we were to get relegated, what do people think would happen to many of the people employed by the club? People behind the scenes who have worked at Manchester United for years, decades even? I know a number of these people and it is naive to think that all these roles will be maintained if we are relegated. I know the response will be 'but we will bounce right back', but we will suffer an absolutely huge loss of income and this ill have to be met somehow.

I love United, and have done for over 30 years. But I have bigger, more real concerns in my life than who owns Manchester United Football Club. I have not been able to see my kids since August last year because of COVID. My mother was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer this year. I agree that a leveraged buy-out of the cub should not have been allowed. But we are where we are. And we are here because we went public as a company. Ever since then, we became open to investors.

And, there is no guarantee that the next investor will be someone who can afford to spend the sum required to buy us without wanting a return on their investment – whilst be happy handing off all running of the club that they own to someone else. If people know of such a person, then fantastic. But in the absence of such knowledge, I feel that this outreach from the Glazers is one that should be both met, and made clear that they will be held accountable to their words.
Fantastic post
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,469
The least they can do, they’re actually in a good position with the team and squad being so good atm one marquee signing would probably even be enough..
One big signing would not be enough after last summer.

Need something like Rice Sancho and Pogba staying to make any real statement of intent
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
13,931
Location
Sunny Manc
They’re quite clearly not going anywhere, so this is certainly a result of sorts. At least this has captured their attention.
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
3,094
Location
Salford
You are correct.

What I responded to was you saying that they couldn't do it, not that they won't do it.
.
Obviously, we don't know what their financial situation is, but they have nothing like the money owners of some other clubs have. I suspect they can't buy the club from their own pockets and spend big at the same time. Anyway, they would never do it either way.
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,469
I was thinking more of Kane, Haaland or Mbappe..
Oh then yeah probably hahah. That would probably shut people up. I wouldn't trust them one bit but it would be a good PR stunt by them.

It's actually very easy for them to end this movement imo.

Do a signing like that and VDS as CEO and protest end for atleast a year.
 

UnitedSofa

You'll Never Walk Away
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
6,790
Just words but if they truly want to get back in the good books so to speak with the fans then they’ll have to follow through with it, only time will tell.

Give them a chance to right the wrongs & this letter (fan ownership, increased investment in first team and stadium/training ground) and maybe they can rebuild trust.

But we must give them a chance to prove it isn’t all guff.

Someone else might be worse or better it all takes time as does the above. The most immediate proof of righting the wrongs and doing what they say they’ll do is increased investment in the squad.
 

diarm

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Messages
16,785
That’s pretty reasonable tbf, but I think they’ll keep taking out dividends maybe not at such a high rate though.
I could live with reasonable dividends once all those points were fixed.
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
13,990
Who thought that that statement was better than no statement at all? Struggling to understand how they think that will appease people and calm things down.
 
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
1,424
I will start to listen when they say...
1) We will make the club debt free by (realistic years)
2) We will stop taking dividends until the club is debt free
3) We will ensure transfer funds are available to compete at the highest level in premier league and CL.
4) we will invest in OT and training ground

Once that’s promised we can only hope they fulfil it and if they do, a debt free United owned by the Glazers isn’t the worse thing. An eccentric billionaire with a grandiose ego who gets involved, thinking of someone like Vincent Tan at Cardiff, would be much more detrimental
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,511
.
Obviously, we don't know what their financial situation is, but they have nothing like the money owners of some other clubs have. I suspect they can't buy the club from their own pockets and spend big at the same time. Anyway, they would never do it either way.
I hate to pin you down on this but it is quite an important detail.

There is no doubt that they could clear the debt if they decided to do so, you are right that they won't do so but that is why it is so important to understand that they could do if they so wished. I explained 2 ways but there are many others.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
Yes, because that helps the team.
This is bigger than the team and 3pts. Jesus wept.

With your attitude of 'well they can't be stopped' Hitler would have walked all over our Army in WWII.

Grow a back bone.
 

swooshboy

Band of Brothers
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
10,737
Location
London
This is bigger than the team and 3pts. Jesus wept.

With your attitude of 'well they can't be stopped' Hitler would have walked all over our Army in WWII.

Grow a back bone.
This is exactly like the Nazis, you are correct.
 

Matthew84!

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2018
Messages
1,161
Location
England, herefordshire
Well I think the letter was worked OK.
I think if they invest heavily in the squad in the summer it would help.
Bring Edwin in to replace Ed.
This would be a good start,
 

HarryRedCrumbs

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2019
Messages
211
They should show willing by sacrificing Avram to the Kraken... who I believe also lives in Florida now.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,528
It's better than nothing but that's just empty talk. They've had time to come up with a commitment that might be a small step in repairing relations and this is the best they can come up with?

It's basically we'll engage superficially but we're not willing to commit to the slightest request. Any one working with upper management types knows what that means.