Greatest mens tennis player of all time

[Parma Dewol]

Not sure why this is even being debated. Princess Charlotte clearly the goat.

 

[Nani Nana]

Djoker is the GOAT, another Major final, still playing at a monumental level aged 36

 

[Salt Bailly]

Fed would have put him away.

 

[GuybrushThreepwood]

Ultimately another title at Roland Garros last month, becoming the first man to win every grand slam at least 3 times, was more important for Djokovic’s legacy, than another Wimbledon title today.

I think with 7 Wimbledon titles he has ‘over-achieved’ there during his career.

 

[Nani Nana]

Ultimately another title at Roland Garros last month, becoming the first man to win every grand slam at least 3 times, was more important for Djokovic’s legacy, than another Wimbledon title today.

I think with 7 Wimbledon titles he has ‘over-achieved’ there during his career.

I agree, the French Open being an all-time record 23rd sealed it

 

[Hound Dog]

I despise Djokovic from the bottom of my soul.

Having said that, I don't understand what case can be made for anyone else being the GOAT unless Nadal makes a miracle recovery and goes on to win two more slams (Djokovic would still be ahead on everything else)

 

[Eddy_JukeZ]

I despise Djokovic from the bottom of my soul.

Having said that, I don't understand what case can be made for anyone else being the GOAT unleed Nadal makes a miracle recovery and goes on to win two more slams (Djokovic would still be ahead on everything else)

How come?

 

[Hound Dog]

How come?

This is hardly a rare take, no ?

 

[Real Name]

No debate anymore. No debate since RG really.

 

[Eddy_JukeZ]

This is hardly a rare take, no ?

No it's not, but I'm just wondering why.

Don't think I've seen many Serbians or people from Serbia who dislike him heavily.

 

[GuybrushThreepwood]

Djokovic's feats in masters series events, winning a record number of them, plus all 9 of them at least twice apiece, is also a very big deal IMO.

The big 3 have played each other 68 times in those tournaments, and the big 3 plus Murray have played each other 108 times in them, so they clearly should be taken very seriously, and more than just a 'tiebreaker'.

On the flipside I do think that the ATP Finals, while still important, are not as big a deal as they used to be. When Sampras and Becker squared off in the final in Hannover in 1996, that felt huge. However the big 3 played each other so many times throughout the season in grand slams, masters series events and also in some ATP 500 events, that it hasn't felt special when they've faced each other yet against at the ATP Finals.

 

[Hound Dog]

No it's not, but I'm just wondering why.

Don't think I've seen many Serbians or people from Serbia who dislike him heavily.

I dont know anything about him that is not widely known.

I find him so dislikable that it completely overrides my patriotism.

 

[AjaxCunian]

Novak is the GOAT with no debate. Greatest and the best male tennis player of all time.

Hope Alcaraz overtakes him one day, little solace for a Nadal fan.

 

[Pexbo]

Novak is the GOAT with no debate. Greatest and the best male tennis player of all time.

Hope Alcaraz overtakes him one day, little solace for a Nadal fan.

I think a big part of what is going to make Djokovic immortal as the GOAT is the fact he did it in the era when Federer and Nadal were at their peak too. Two other GOAT candidates and he came out on top.

Let’s put forward a hypothetical scenario where Alcaraz spends the next 15 years cleaning up, beats all of Djokovic’s records and ends up on 35 grand slams. By all metrics he’s the best ever but I guarantee you the Internet argument will be that he would never have done it if he had even one of Nadal and Federer to compete against let alone two.

 

[AjaxCunian]

I think a big part of what is going to make Djokovic immortal as the GOAT is the fact he did it in the era when Federer and Nadal were at their peak too. Two other GOAT candidates and he came out on top.

Let’s put forward a hypothetical scenario where Alcaraz spends the next 15 years cleaning up, beats all of Djokovic’s records and ends up on 35 grand slams. By all metrics he’s the best ever but I guarantee you the Internet argument will be that he would never have done it if he had even one of Nadal and Federer to compete against let alone two.

That would make very interesting debate ofcourse.

It's kind of what makes me put Federer at #3. And in some sense, Nadal might have had it harder than Djokovic even.

He had to play against the best versions of Federer and Djokovic. Nadal and Federer the past 8 years have struggled so much with their bodies.

 

[Acole9]

Regardless of what people think of him I would say Djokovic.

 

[ThatsGreat]

Alcaraz has 2 titles at 20. If he wins 2 a year for the next 10 years he'll be within striking distance of Djokovic.

 

[Andy_Cole]

What will be fascinating is his battle with Alcaraz. If he makes it a battle and wins a handful of grandslams then it solidifies him as the goat. Even if he loses the battle he still is. He is 36!

 

[Skills]

Alcaraz has 2 titles at 20. If he wins 2 a year for the next 10 years he'll be within striking distance of Djokovic.

That's a massive if. He has to win 50% of the grand slams available for the next 10 years to get there. That's a huge ask.

 

[DutchSerb]

That's a massive if. He has to win 50% of the grand slams available for the next 10 years to get there. That's a huge ask.

Yep talent wise he definitely can, but he's no stranger to physical discomfort and injury. Gotta see how he holds up long term. His style of play is also more taxing on the body than Novak's in my opinion.

 

[Skills]

Yep talent wise he definitely can, but he's no stranger to physical discomfort and injury. Gotta see how he holds up long term. His style of play is also more taxing on the body than Novak's in my opinion.

Yeah, his build is also quite bulky - like Rafa. Djokovic and Federer were super leany and light on their feet.

It'll be interesting to see which Grand Slam he end up making his own. Rafa had RG, Roger Wimbledon and Novak AO that they won year after year.

His best shot is actually Wimbledon - nobody else is any good on grass. So if he improves his serve, he could win it year after year without much of a struggle.

 

[TheRedDevil'sAdvocate]

I think that Federer will always be "Mr. Tennis". From the way he played to his appearance and the way he conducted himself, he looked like he embodied every thing the sport is about.

I don't get the hate for Djokovic. If anything, he seemed to me more gracious in defeat than the other two. The weirdest thing about him for me (as a football and basketball fan first and foremost) is that i've learnt to associate that particular area of the Balkans with attacking quality and finesse. More with temperamental maestros and less with winning machines. Anyway, the numbers don't lie. And i still believe he'll make it to 25 grand slams by the end of his career.

Alcaraz is very exciting. The only young one who seems to have the minerals to match the accomplishments of the big-three.

 

[groovyalbert]

Djokovic has the most claim to the title and it's hard to argue against it. He's an absolute force of nature, mentality and quality. Deserves all the titles he has.

That said, if you were to offer me tickets to watch a match of my choice live, I'd choose both Nadal and Federer over him.

 

[DutchSerb]

Yeah, his build is also quite bulky - like Rafa. Djokovic and Federer were super leany and light on their feet.

It'll be interesting to see which Grand Slam he end up making his own. Rafa had RG, Roger Wimbledon and Novak AO that they won year after year.

His best shot is actually Wimbledon - nobody else is any good on grass. So if he improves his serve, he could win it year after year without much of a struggle.

I think Wimbledon as well, but RG too, he looked spectacular the last time up until the cramps. Really made some good established tennis players look like beginners.

 

[Andrade]

No debate anymore. No debate since RG really.

We will see in 20-30 years how each is viewed.

 

[Andrade]

Alcaraz has 2 titles at 20. If he wins 2 a year for the next 10 years he'll be within striking distance of Djokovic.

That's a big ask. Especially as it's tough to just avoid injury for 10 straight years, let alone win 2 slams a year for 10 years.

 

[Real Name]

We will see in 20-30 years how each is viewed.

We will. But for it's settled.

 

[ThatsGreat]

That's a big ask. Especially as it's tough to just avoid injury for 10 straight years, let alone win 2 slams a year for 10 years.

He's off to a good start though. Also doesn;t seem to have any obvious weakness, will be in contention on all surfaces like Djokovic mentioned.

 

[tentan]

Yeah, his build is also quite bulky - like Rafa. Djokovic and Federer were super leany and light on their feet.

It'll be interesting to see which Grand Slam he end up making his own. Rafa had RG, Roger Wimbledon and Novak AO that they won year after year.

His best shot is actually Wimbledon - nobody else is any good on grass. So if he improves his serve, he could win it year after year without much of a struggle.

It's obviously going to the only one you didn't mention.

 

[Andrade]

We will. But for it's settled.

It's a game of opinions

 

[Real Name]

It's a game of opinions

Of course. Who is the goat in your opinion?

 

[Andrade]

He's off to a good start though. Also doesn;t seem to have any obvious weakness, will be in contention on all surfaces like Djokovic mentioned.

Oh I don't deny that at all, how can you get off to a better start than being the youngest man ever to be ranked number one? However it's just difficult to sustain that high a level of play over a decade plus. Just because Djokovic makes it seem normal, doesn't mean that it is.

 

[Andrade]

Of course. Who is the goat in your opinion?

Federer

 

[amolbhatia50k]

Who would be the best in the 80s and 90s?

 

[B20]

Who would be the best in the 80s and 90s?

Sampras, very closely followed by Borg.

 

[Skills]

Sampras, very closely followed by Borg.

Borg was more 70s than 80s. Retired in 81.

80s was a bit of a weird era - quite a few different champions. Wilander and Lendl won 7 each - and Lendl was World number 1 for 238 weeks and made another 10 slam finals in the 80s.

 

[B20]

Borg was more 70s than 80s. Retired in 81.

I've mandela'd myself. was sure he was playing up till the mid 80s.

 

[B20]

The question is how sampras would fare against the big 3.

On clay he'd be thrashed, obviously.

I think he'd win a fair number on grass and hard court. And on the kind of grass that was used back in the 90s, I reckon only federer could have lived with him.

 

[GuyfromAustria]

Who would be the best in the 80s and 90s?

Thomas Muster

 

[Redplane]

Sampras, very closely followed by Borg.

Agree with Sampras.

I personally even consider him the greatest, perhaps tied with Federer. Some of that is because I consider his era to be the greatest era in tennis I am familiar with. Looking at all the players he had to compete with: Agassi, Rafter, Courier, Safin, Edberg, Rios, Kafelnikov, Kuerten, Rafter, Hewitt and even some "lesser" players who could beat anyone on their day like a Ivanisevic, Krajicek and Chang. Part of his weakness on clay could have to do with also having to compete with so many specialists. So many of those players by themselves would be a major get for a tournament. Have we ever had an era as rich of tennis stars as then?