Matthew84!
Full Member
I've said Martial and Lingard and 75m for Kane but we could always offer DVB? He'd suit them better
not a chance. Kane is better, at this very moment in time. I did see a few people claim hes overrated, fecking hell hahaI would prefer Haaland.
#21 and #4 would be on the way if we pulled that off but unfortunately real life isn't manager modeSo we're getting kane, sancho, a DM and a CB? Gonna be a good season
I actually think both Lingard and Martial would be good signings for them. Both offer them something different. Could see Lingard, Son and Martial linking up nicely.Genuinely offering Martial and/or Lingard could be a tempter for Spurs. They'll obviously be desperate to sign goalscorers to replace the chasm of goals they'd be missing if Kane left.
City's backups are too good to be offered in deals like this. Also all paid far too much to go to Spurs, though Martial is in the same sort of situation.
they'd absolutely walk the league with Kane. Win it by a landslideI think he would be perfect for City's forward line.
I'm optimistic. . . that we won't get him.Love how everyone is convinced we won’t get him and will make up scenarios as to why.
No one is ever optimistic in this place
I prefer Haaland and your response is 'not a chance'not a chance. Kane is better, at this very moment in time. I did see a few people claim hes overrated, fecking hell haha
Aye they'd walk Europe too with him...they'd absolutely walk the league with Kane. Win it by a landslide
For some reason I was thinking you thought Haaland was betterI prefer Haaland and your response is 'not a chance'
For some reason I was thinking you thought Haaland was better
He nearly went there last summer if VDS hadn't done the businessI've said Martial and Lingard and 75m for Kane but we could always offer DVB? He'd suit them better
It's called being real! We just can't justify spending that sort of cash on a position when we need others filling firstLove how everyone is convinced we won’t get him and will make up scenarios as to why.
No one is ever optimistic in this place
He’d be perfect here too! We’ve signed zlatan and Cavani years past their prime, we should be going all out for this guy. Don’t think we stand much chance against a city side with his goals.I think he would be perfect for City's forward line.
Yeah I wouldn't disagree with that if the other two were Varane and decent CDM otherwise I would actually edge towards Kane and two even though we have needed a proper RW for EIGHT yearsHe makes far more sense to City than Haaland ever did. Wonderful footballer. I’d rather 3 signings with Sancho than 2 with Kane though.
- Stays at Spurs -This is like when Van Persie became available - whoever signs him wins the league next season.
Was believable until you said Varane for £35m as think it will take around £50m plus addonsMbappe to Madrid, flog Martial to PSG and use that money to get sancho. VDB plus 90m for Kane. Lingard plus 40m for Rice. Varane for 35m. Heaton on a free. Sell James, Axel, De Gea, Dalot, Matic and Pereira. Promote Laird and Garner. 110m net spend and best squad in Europe. Build statue of Woody. Win trophies. Simple.
Pissed off. Would be appalling decision making I think.Not saying it's the right thing to do but Utd will easily drop signing Varane/Sancho for Kane probably both, so what would people feel about that as those two play in positions we badly need to address this summer
And Pep said that if they are spending 100 mil (which is only in his world "big signing") that that player is for next 10 years.Man City dont spend big money on players, they spend in 60-70 reigon.
Much as it pains me to admit it that is hard to argue withNot a prayer he's coming here.
He doesn't want the uncertainty of a "project". He'll want guaranteed medals, City and Guardiola can more or less guarantee that.
Last year of his contract - nobody is paying close to 50m for him. But tbh if we signed Kane and Sancho I’d take giving Phil Jones another crack at centre backWas believable until you said Varane for £35m as think it will take around £50m plus addons
Yeah I could cope with McFred & Magalof (hate that name) IF we pulled off that miracle but this isn't FM and things like that just don't happen in real life for us under these leeching yankee scumbagsLast year of his contract - nobody is paying close to 50m for him. But tbh if we signed Kane and Sancho I’d take giving Phil Jones another crack at centre back
I don't think City will come close to putting in the fee we would. Can see it being Maguire like in the way it pans out.I think top of Kane's list will be Man City.
He's desperate for trophies..
I know, we have nothing that comes close to the service that Steven Bergwijn was serving up on the right for Spurs earlier this season.It feels like if we go for Kane we're just throwing the transfer plans out the window. Kane wont even be as prolific for us as he would for some other teams because he is only getting service from the left side and nothing from the right.
Where does he get service from at Tottenham?It feels like if we go for Kane we're just throwing the transfer plans out the window. Kane wont even be as prolific for us as he would for some other teams because he is only getting service from the left side and nothing from the right.