prior to his injury this year he had played 187 Pl games out of 210 (about 90%) I doubt we have had many players manage that (and certainly none who have scored 133 goals in that time)I’m not questioning his quality, but his injury record is concerning and he will cost an absolute fortune. It can’t be denied.
and kane can prolong his playing career by not having the distraction of european football for a couple of years?Manchester City is his only possible option if he leaves Spurs. We will not pay what City want. Kane will not go to Madrid after seeing Bale and Beckham become half the players they were after moving there, and I doubt he's a priority for Zidane.
Man City might fancy boosting their attack as Aguerro is 31. City could offer Spurs the likes of Stones/Jesus/Sane to bring the price down.
Well it will probably be overturned. If not then there's really no other big club in Europe that is going to spend the kind of money on him that Levy will ask for.and kane can prolong his playing career by not having the distraction of european football for a couple of years?
Yeah I'd agree the focus this window needs to be on getting the creative department up to scratch. Of course if we were particularly successful in moving on unwanted players for good fees then we could conceivably have more for s striker. That's speculative though of course.Well I'm hoping we will sign Sancho, Grealish/Maddison and Dembele. If a 4th player were to come in, then a CB or DM.
We shouldn't have that attitude when every quality player comes available though. Kane for me is one of the top 5 strikers in World Football, when Sanchez left Arsenal he wasn't that, i'm not even sure i'd have had him as top 20 tbh. The real big issue with Kane is his injury history, but his goal scoring and all round play is still top notch and he's just entering his prime. It's a no brainer tbh and it would be a huge cash cow marketing wise.It's like we learned nothing from the Sanchez transfer.
Can't see Jose having much interest in MartialIf we could get him for around the cost of Sancho it would be worth it. Offer Martial and $$$ would be an even better deal. Not happening though, selling Kane would undo everything Poch did during his team there. They'd go back to being mid-table and unlikely to even compete for top 4.
Oh OK. I'm sorry. I almost thought you're a dummy, saying under Ole King is our prefered standard of player and all we can hope for as supporters of this club..Unlike Dybala and Haaland we actually made a bid for King in January and he wants to come but Eddie Howe refused to sell.
Of course the real story is he dying to leave, same shit different day . All injurid players show up to their teams matches.I don’t think he will leave because I don’t see anyone paying what it would take. But him signing a contract before a whole lot of things changed won’t be the reason.
Id expect it to be at least 3 if not 4 seasons before he can lead the line, and that’s gambling on him cracking on to that point, even though he does look very promising. Would you not want us to be good in the meantime? Personally I don’t think we’re good enough with Martial leading the line.He was a dream signing a few years ago but I'm confident that Greenwood will be our first choice number 9 in a couple of seasons and Martial is good enough until then so we'd be stupid to spend 150 million+ on him.
Wouldn't be surprised if Aubameyang decides to give Spain a go in the summer, I would definitely take him as compared to Kane he has a very impressive injury record these last few years but Utd might well feel that he could hinder the development of MasonI'd take Aubameyang over Kane. He's 30, which isn't young but old enough to allow Greenwood to come through at his own pace.