devilish
Juventus fan who used to support United
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2002
- Messages
- 61,714
kkcbl said:But that's not the reasons Afghanistan & Iraq were invaded, i.e. to do favours for the peoples of those two countries, were they?
If that's the case, there are plenty more places for them to invade, so why stop at two, going by your argument?
Are you saying the average Muslim has?
Er, I think even western think-tanks & politicians suggest that as one of the reasons.
Agree about them being more destructive - they should never have been supported & financed by the west in the first place - a frankenstein monster was created. ( don't know whether you should be so bold as to say right-wing groups never incited, attacked or killed anyone - lots of individuals have been murdered by racially motivated atacks )
1) Well you shouldnt see the reason behind it but the result of such actions. Today Afghanistan and Iraq had been freed. Instead the average Muslim critise such action, so the question comes natural, is the average Muslim in favor of such groups?
2) I havent understood you.
3) As stated you shouldnt invade a country basing on a lie yet its the result that matter and not the reason behind it.
4) You are right. That should have thought the western world a lesson and that is, never trust those who hate you and expect action rather then the usual BS. De ja vu?